public inbox for mauve-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>
Cc: Sascha Brawer <brawer@dandelis.ch>,
	mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com, commit-classpath@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Mauve patch
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 05:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vfkc4amd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404061346.i36DkRdh019920@arch20m.dellroad.org>

>>>>> "Archie" == Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> writes:

Archie> This patch doesn't guarantee anything, and in general it's impossible
Archie> to make this test "correct" because the spec allows finalization and
Archie> reference enqueuing to happen after arbitrarily long delays.

Yeah, these tests are basically bogus.  I thought I had removed them,
but I guess I forgot.

Archie> This patch simply makes the test "correct" for JC (and possibly
Archie> some other VM(s) out there). Since there's no way to *ensure* the
Archie> finalizer and reference enqueing thread(s) have run, we just try
Archie> to give them every opportunity to do so before declaring that their
Archie> work should be done.

I think the patch is fine to go in.  It certainly doesn't make the
situation any worse.

Perhaps it is better to just remove the test.  Or make a new
"unportable" section of Mauve, since some things seemingly can't be
tested.

Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-07  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200404060330.i363UY1B018067@arch20m.dellroad.org>
2004-04-06 11:52 ` Sascha Brawer
2004-04-06 12:15   ` Ingo Prötel
2004-04-06 14:08   ` Archie Cobbs
2004-04-07  5:45     ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2004-04-07  6:01       ` Stephen Crawley
2004-04-07 14:53         ` Archie Cobbs
2004-04-15 21:04     ` Mark Wielaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vfkc4amd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
    --to=tromey@redhat.com \
    --cc=archie@dellroad.org \
    --cc=brawer@dandelis.ch \
    --cc=commit-classpath@gnu.org \
    --cc=mauve-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).