public inbox for newlib@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Sherrill <joel@rtems.org>
To: newlib@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH newlib 0/1] sys/signal.h needs sys/_intsup.h
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:12:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210825191245.30049-1-joel@rtems.org> (raw)

Hi

The recent addition of the sig2str block of code for definitions and 
prototypes resulted in the following one line program not compiling
for RTEMS targets:

#include <sys/signal.h>

Turned out that __STDINT_EXP used to conditionalize the definition
of SIG2STR_MAX isn't defined unless <sys/_intsup.h> is included.
I guess the test code got lucky.

It's a simple patch that needed more background and investigation
than code.

Is it safe to assume that including each POSIX and Standard C Library file
independently should compile? If so, I will file a ticket to at least at
those to the RTEMS compile only tests like the ones we have that check
a method can be used per the specific includes in the POSIX specification.

Sorry this slipped through.

--joel

Joel Sherrill (1):
  sys/signal.h: <sys/_intsup.h> is needed for __STDINT_EXP

 newlib/libc/include/sys/signal.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

-- 
2.24.4


             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-25 19:12 Joel Sherrill [this message]
2021-08-25 19:12 ` [PATCH newlib 1/1] sys/signal.h: <sys/_intsup.h> is needed for __STDINT_EXP Joel Sherrill
     [not found] ` <DM3P110MB052286CA15662F2A669975A29AC69@DM3P110MB0522.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2021-08-25 19:48   ` Fw: [PATCH newlib 0/1] sys/signal.h needs sys/_intsup.h C Howland
2021-08-26 23:28     ` Joel Sherrill
2021-08-27 10:15       ` Corinna Vinschen
2021-08-27 13:47         ` Joel Sherrill
     [not found]           ` <DM3P110MB05221A305E6DAF45A77CCCAA9AC89@DM3P110MB0522.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2021-08-27 15:12             ` C Howland
2021-08-27 16:16               ` Joel Sherrill
2021-08-27 17:52                 ` C Howland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210825191245.30049-1-joel@rtems.org \
    --to=joel@rtems.org \
    --cc=newlib@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).