Reentrant version of inttypes methods

Reentrant version of inttypes methods

[Aditya Upadhyay]

Hello All,

In FreeBSD, There is a _inttypes.h for reentrant version of inttypes
methods. So, Do i need to make reentrant version of inttypes.h ? It
seems there does not exist something like _inttypes.h stuff in newlib
or Do i have to add the declaration of strtoimax_l and _strtoimax_r in
stdlib.h file ? I think, There should be  _inttypes.h header file
support for reentrant version of inttypes method. Please correct me if
i am wrong.


Thanks & Regards,
Aditya Upadhyay

Re: Reentrant version of inttypes methods

[Gedare Bloom]

I think the reentrant functions can be declared directly in inttypes.h
as other headers do in libc/include. Put the _r (and _l) versions
close to the declarations of the non-reentrant.

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Aditya Upadhyay <aadit0402@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> In FreeBSD, There is a _inttypes.h for reentrant version of inttypes
> methods. So, Do i need to make reentrant version of inttypes.h ? It
> seems there does not exist something like _inttypes.h stuff in newlib
> or Do i have to add the declaration of strtoimax_l and _strtoimax_r in
> stdlib.h file ? I think, There should be  _inttypes.h header file
> support for reentrant version of inttypes method. Please correct me if
> i am wrong.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Aditya Upadhyay

Re: Reentrant version of inttypes methods

[Aditya Upadhyay]

Yes, I have seen many files which contains declaration of reentrant
version of methods like stdlib.h, string.h etc.. I am adding the
declaration of same in original inttypes.h header file. Also i have
gone through the newlib libc docs and have seen list of reentrant
function. Finally, i am having understanding of reentrancy.

Thanks & Regards,
Aditya Upadhyay

On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare@rtems.org> wrote:
> I think the reentrant functions can be declared directly in inttypes.h
> as other headers do in libc/include. Put the _r (and _l) versions
> close to the declarations of the non-reentrant.
>
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Aditya Upadhyay <aadit0402@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> In FreeBSD, There is a _inttypes.h for reentrant version of inttypes
>> methods. So, Do i need to make reentrant version of inttypes.h ? It
>> seems there does not exist something like _inttypes.h stuff in newlib
>> or Do i have to add the declaration of strtoimax_l and _strtoimax_r in
>> stdlib.h file ? I think, There should be  _inttypes.h header file
>> support for reentrant version of inttypes method. Please correct me if
>> i am wrong.
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Aditya Upadhyay

Re: Reentrant version of inttypes methods

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 707 bytes --]

On 07/23/2017 07:36 AM, Aditya Upadhyay wrote:
> Yes, I have seen many files which contains declaration of reentrant
...

> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare@rtems.org> wrote:
>> I think the reentrant functions can be declared directly in inttypes.h
>> as other headers do in libc/include. Put the _r (and _l) versions
>> close to the declarations of the non-reentrant.
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Aditya Upadhyay <aadit0402@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello All,

It's harder to read conversations on technical lists when you top-post.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 619 bytes --]