updating newlib website

updating newlib website

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 216 bytes --]

anyone mind if i push documentation updates to the newlib website ?
seems the manuals and such haven't been updated in years.

i was also thinking of including pdf versions of the manuals.  any
reason not to ?
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: updating newlib website

[Jeff Johnston]

Please go ahead.

On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 2:24 AM Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> anyone mind if i push documentation updates to the newlib website ?
> seems the manuals and such haven't been updated in years.
>
> i was also thinking of including pdf versions of the manuals.  any
> reason not to ?
> -mike
>

Re: updating newlib website

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 405 bytes --]

ah i noticed that the pdf/dvi/etc... are already pushed to the mirrors,
just not committed to cvs.
https://sourceware.org/ftp/newlib/index.html

those look even older than the html manual in cvs.  i have access to the cvs
website, but not the ftp mirror (at least i don't think i do).  any opinion
on next step ?  should we keep the binary blobs (i.e. pdf) in the ftp mirror
and not commit to cvs ?
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: updating newlib website

[Jeff Johnston]

Are you referring to the libc and libm html files in newlib-htdocs that
appear on the newlib docs web-page?

I think that the html files on the newlib-htdocs page and the binary files
on the ftp web-site should both be updated.

If you send the updated files or post them to the list, I'll put them up
for anything you don't have access to.

-- Jeff J.

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:13 PM Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> ah i noticed that the pdf/dvi/etc... are already pushed to the mirrors,
> just not committed to cvs.
> https://sourceware.org/ftp/newlib/index.html
>
> those look even older than the html manual in cvs.  i have access to the
> cvs
> website, but not the ftp mirror (at least i don't think i do).  any opinion
> on next step ?  should we keep the binary blobs (i.e. pdf) in the ftp
> mirror
> and not commit to cvs ?
> -mike
>