* improving test framework
@ 2024-01-04 23:46 Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2024-01-04 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: newlib
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 439 bytes --]
the recent discussions of regressions, and with people proposing patches that
seemed buggy, makes me think the test framework is not easy to run, or that
comprehensive. seems like we should be able to configure newlib for native
builds (i.e. non-cross-compiling), and `make check` should "just work", and
we should require people add/improve tests when changing core functions.
anyone have experience with the existing framework ?
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-01-04 23:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-04 23:46 improving test framework Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).