mails from markus@trippesldorf.de don't make it to libc-alpha@sourceware.org

mails from markus@trippesldorf.de don't make it to libc-alpha@sourceware.org

[octoploid]

Hi,

I cannot post messages to libc-alpha@sourceware.org  with my 
markus@trippesldorf.de account anymore. 
(Posting to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org however works fine).

All mails are just silently rejected after 24h.

Could you please remove my email address from the black list?

Thanks.

Re: mails from markus@trippesldorf.de don't make it to libc-alpha@sourceware.org

[octoploid]

01.02.2017, 17:44, "octoploid" <octoploid@yandex.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot post messages to libc-alpha@sourceware.org with my
> markus@trippesldorf.de account anymore.
> (Posting to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org however works fine).
>
> All mails are just silently rejected after 24h.
>
> Could you please remove my email address from the black list?

Here is an example:

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.ud10.udmedia.de.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<libc-alpha@sourceware.org>:
recipient did not talk proper QMTP (#4.3.0)
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Received: (qmail 30027 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2017 17:10:06 +0100
Received: from ip5b405f78.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de (HELO x4) (ud10?360p3@91.64.95.120)
  by mail.ud10.udmedia.de with ESMTPSA (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 31 Jan 2017 17:10:06 +0100
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:10:05 +0100
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] malloc per-thread cache ready for review
Message-ID: <20170131161005.GD288@x4>
References: <xn8tptn33k.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
 <014d5212-5009-07e4-62c2-c88586c095a5@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <014d5212-5009-07e4-62c2-c88586c095a5@redhat.com>

On 2017.01.31 at 10:14 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 01:16 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >
> > Well, thank you for testing it at least :-)
> >
> > I'll work on debugging that.  Hopefully it's something stupid I "fixed"
> > recently, and not a design flaw somewhere...
>
> Whatever email Markus sent you is not on the list?
>
> Markus, would you mind sharing on list?

I will try. The mail was rejected without any given reason.

Here it is:

On 2017.01.26 at 14:29 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Tested on x86-64 and x86-32, including replacing the system glibc.

I gave your patch a quick spin on a x86_64-pc-linux-gnu machine.
Unfortunately it turned out to be quite unusable.
For example gcc would just hang when trying to compile simple programs
(after e.g. cc1plus finishes, it just stays idle, instead of calling the
assembler and linker next).

And sometimes gcc would ICE like:

cc1: arena.c:713: detach_arena: Assertion `replaced_arena->attached_threads > 0' failed.
In file included from malloc.c:1869:0:
arena.c: In function ‘arena_get2.part.5’:
arena.c:937:1: internal compiler error: Aborted
 }
 ^
0x7f4dcc5f23af ???
        /home/markus/glibc/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sigaction.c:0
0x7f4dcc5f232e __GI_raise
        ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
0x7f4dcc5f3f3f __GI_abort
        /home/markus/glibc/stdlib/abort.c:89
0x7f4dcc6403d9 __malloc_assert
        /home/markus/glibc/malloc/malloc.c:296
0x7f4dcc5dbd00 detach_arena
        /home/markus/glibc/malloc/arena.c:713
0x7f4dcc640fa3 detach_arena
        /home/markus/glibc/malloc/arena.c:833
0x7f4dcc640fa3 _int_new_arena
        /home/markus/glibc/malloc/arena.c:773
0x7f4dcc640fa3 arena_get2
        /home/markus/glibc/malloc/arena.c:962
0x7f4dcc648eca arena_get2
        /home/markus/glibc/malloc/arena.c:930
0x7f4dcc648eca __GI___libc_malloc
        /home/markus/glibc/malloc/malloc.c:2988
0x7f4dcc5dc46f __libc_start_main
        ../csu/libc-start.c:295
0x122e509 ???
        ../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120


--
Markus

Re: mails from markus@trippesldorf.de don't make it to libc-alpha@sourceware.org

[octoploid]

01.02.2017, 18:25, "Christopher Faylor" <overseers@sourceware.org>:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:44:01PM +0100, octoploid wrote:
>> I cannot post messages to libc-alpha@sourceware.org with my
>> markus@trippesldorf.de account anymore.
>> (Posting to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org however works fine).
>>
>> All mails are just silently rejected after 24h.
>>
>> Could you please remove my email address from the black list?
>
> You're not in a "blacklist".
>
> If you can send email to gcc-patches you should be able to send email to
> libc-alpha. There are no records in the logs indicating any spam
> bounces for markus@trippesldorf.de (sic). There are records indicating
> successful email sent by markus@trippelsdorf.de .
>
> From: <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
> To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> System ud10.udmedia.de [194.117.254.50] (EHLO mail.ud10.udmedia.de)
> Pid: 29805, from Wed Feb 1 11:50:03 2017 to Wed Feb 1 11:50:18 2017
>   (connect) earlytalker: pass, not spontaneous
>   (connect) relay: skip, no match
>   (ehlo) helo: pass
>   (mail) badmailfrom: pass (markus@trippelsdorf.de)
>   (rcpt) badrcptto: pass
>   (rcpt) rcpt_ok: pass: gcc.gnu.org in rcpthosts
>   (data_post) headers: pass
>   (data_post) pass, Ham, -2.5 < 10, learn=ham
>   (data_post) virus::clamdscan: pass, clean
>   221 sourceware.org closing connection. Have a wonderful day.
>
> There is nothing indicating any attempts to send email from
> markus@trippelsdorf.de to libc-alpha in the logs at all. So, it seems
> like any problems are probably on your side.
>
> It looks like "ud10.udmedia.de" is the system that is sending mail and
> there are a lot of these in the logs:
>
> From:
> To:
> System ud10.udmedia.de [194.117.254.50] (EHLO ylmf-pc)
> Pid: 106700, from Tue Jan 31 21:07:31 2017 to Tue Jan 31 21:07:31 2017
>   (connect) earlytalker: fail, remote started talking before we said hello
>   550 Connecting host started transmitting before SMTP greeting
>
> So, if this is you, something seems to be misconfigured on your end.
>
> Btw, the place to send email problems like this for this site or any
> other site is "postmaster@".

Well, I did send to postmaster@ at first, but from markus@trippesldorf.de, 
so the mail didn't reach you...

Yes, ud10.udmedia.de is the mail server I'm using. I will contact my provider.

Re: mails from markus@trippesldorf.de don't make it to libc-alpha@sourceware.org

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:15:02PM +0100, octoploid wrote:
>01.02.2017, 17:44, "octoploid" <octoploid@yandex.com>:
>> I cannot post messages to libc-alpha@sourceware.org with my
>> markus@trippesldorf.de account anymore.
>> (Posting to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org however works fine).
>>
>> All mails are just silently rejected after 24h.
>>
>> Could you please remove my email address from the black list?
>
>Here is an example:
>
>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.ud10.udmedia.de.
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
>This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
><libc-alpha@sourceware.org>:
>recipient did not talk proper QMTP (#4.3.0)
>I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.

For the record, this bounce message is not a "silently rejected"
scenario.  You got a clear bounce message which should have been reported
as your first communication.  It is a sign that I had a port
misconfigured on sourceware and that is now fixed.

Re: mails from markus@trippesldorf.de don't make it to libc-alpha@sourceware.org

[octoploid]

01.02.2017, 18:44, "Christopher Faylor" <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 06:15:02PM +0100, octoploid wrote:
>> 01.02.2017, 17:44, "octoploid" <octoploid@yandex.com>:
>>>  I cannot post messages to libc-alpha@sourceware.org with my
>>>  markus@trippesldorf.de account anymore.
>>>  (Posting to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org however works fine).
>>>
>>>  All mails are just silently rejected after 24h.
>>>
>>>  Could you please remove my email address from the black list?
>>
>> Here is an example:
>>
>> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.ud10.udmedia.de.
>> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
>> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>>
>> <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>:
>> recipient did not talk proper QMTP (#4.3.0)
>> I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
>
> For the record, this bounce message is not a "silently rejected"
> scenario. You got a clear bounce message which should have been reported
> as your first communication. It is a sign that I had a port
> misconfigured on sourceware and that is now fixed.

Thanks and sorry.