Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?

Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?

[Chris Faylor]

I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat.com.
Here's the header I received:

>Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
>Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
>Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
>From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
>To: cgf@redhat.com
>Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redhat.com
>Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Length: 3242

Notice the 'Reply-To:'.  This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.com:

>Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com

As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?

Should we contact Red Hat about this?

cgf

Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 20000724190500.A7298@cygnus.com >you write:
  > I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat
  > .com.
  > Here's the header I received:
  > 
  > >Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
  > >Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
  > >Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
  > >From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
  > >To: cgf@redhat.com
  > >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redha
  > t.com
  > >Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
  > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  > >Content-Length: 3242
  > 
  > Notice the 'Reply-To:'.  This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.c
  > om:
  > 
  > >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sourc
  > es.redhat.com
  > 
  > As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?
  > 
  > Should we contact Red Hat about this?
Yes, it's probably rewriting it to implement host hiding.

jeff

Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?

[Jim Kingdon]

> Should we contact Red Hat about this?

Sounds like it to me (North Carolina sysadmin, specifically).  As for
how to do that, well, the official channel is sysadmin@redhat.com.
Whether it gets you any kind of reasonable response is another
question, but it is always good practice to be able to say "I tried
submitting it through channels" before working other channels.  In the
case of adding sources.redhat.com to the DNS, I sent email to
sysadmin@redhat.com about 2 or 3 times, a week or a few apart.

Then you call someone up.  I picked Nate Golnik because I had sort of
heard of him second-hand.  And he got it done a day or so later.  If
you know someone, you might start there....

Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 20000724190500.A7298@cygnus.com >you write:
  > I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat
  > .com.
  > Here's the header I received:
  > 
  > >Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
  > >Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
  > >Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
  > >From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
  > >To: cgf@redhat.com
  > >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redha
  > t.com
  > >Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
  > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  > >Content-Length: 3242
  > 
  > Notice the 'Reply-To:'.  This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.c
  > om:
  > 
  > >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sourc
  > es.redhat.com
  > 
  > As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?
  > 
  > Should we contact Red Hat about this?
Yes, it's probably rewriting it to implement host hiding.

jeff

Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?

[Chris Faylor]

I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat.com.
Here's the header I received:

>Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
>Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
>Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
>From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
>To: cgf@redhat.com
>Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redhat.com
>Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Length: 3242

Notice the 'Reply-To:'.  This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.com:

>Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com

As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?

Should we contact Red Hat about this?

cgf

Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?

[Jim Kingdon]

> Should we contact Red Hat about this?

Sounds like it to me (North Carolina sysadmin, specifically).  As for
how to do that, well, the official channel is sysadmin@redhat.com.
Whether it gets you any kind of reasonable response is another
question, but it is always good practice to be able to say "I tried
submitting it through channels" before working other channels.  In the
case of adding sources.redhat.com to the DNS, I sent email to
sysadmin@redhat.com about 2 or 3 times, a week or a few apart.

Then you call someone up.  I picked Nate Golnik because I had sort of
heard of him second-hand.  And he got it done a day or so later.  If
you know someone, you might start there....