* Publishing test results
2000-12-30 6:08 Publishing test results Andrew Cagney
@ 2000-07-31 23:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-07-31 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sources for Courses
Hello,
I'm looking guidelines on how to add a proper test results section to
GDB's web pages. At present GDB has:
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/#testing which, among other things, points
to non GDB web pages ....
Looking around I note that GCC has: http://gcc.gnu.org/testresults/ .
I'm first wondering if anyone has comments on this or suggestions for
what ways of getting results published would be acceptable (from a
sware/security standpoint).
Implementation wise, I've had suggested:
o have the remote machine
push results onto sware
(means that the remote
machine has an open
ssh key around)
o have sware pull
results off of a remote
machine
o have results submitted
via a mailing list...
Does GCC use any of these?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Publishing test results
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
@ 2000-07-31 23:15 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-07-31 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Sources for Courses
In message < 398667D6.A803FC7D@cygnus.com >you write:
> Hello,
> Implementation wise, I've had suggested:
>
> o have the remote machine
> push results onto sware
> (means that the remote
> machine has an open
> ssh key around)
>
> o have sware pull
> results off of a remote
> machine
>
> o have results submitted
> via a mailing list...
>
> Does GCC use any of these?
GCC uses the last. However, I think the code sitting on the mailing list
went nuts a while back and hasn't been adding new data into the database.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Publishing test results
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
@ 2000-08-01 13:09 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-08-01 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: overseers
> o have results submitted via a mailing list...
This is what I'd recommend too. This is what mozilla.org does for
example (their test result summarizer is called tinderbox).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Publishing test results
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2000-08-01 13:19 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-08-01 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Sources for Courses
Andrew> Looking around I note that GCC has:
Andrew> http://gcc.gnu.org/testresults/ . I'm first wondering if
Andrew> anyone has comments on this or suggestions for what ways of
Andrew> getting results published would be acceptable (from a
Andrew> sware/security standpoint).
For the actual publishing, if you're inside RedHat, look here:
http://cygweb.cygnnus.com/cgi-bin/libgcj.cgi
This is something I worked on for a while but haven't had time to
finish. It is fairly modular. One part that hasn't been done is
uploading test results into the database. I wish I had time to finish
this, but I don't -- it has proved very useful to us on our gcj work.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Publishing test results
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2000-08-03 1:25 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-08-03 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sources for Courses
Thanks for all the comments. I'm now working on HP ....
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Publishing test results
2000-12-30 6:08 Publishing test results Andrew Cagney
2000-07-31 23:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey
2000-08-01 13:19 ` Tom Tromey
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Sources for Courses
Andrew> Looking around I note that GCC has:
Andrew> http://gcc.gnu.org/testresults/ . I'm first wondering if
Andrew> anyone has comments on this or suggestions for what ways of
Andrew> getting results published would be acceptable (from a
Andrew> sware/security standpoint).
For the actual publishing, if you're inside RedHat, look here:
http://cygweb.cygnnus.com/cgi-bin/libgcj.cgi
This is something I worked on for a while but haven't had time to
finish. It is fairly modular. One part that hasn't been done is
uploading test results into the database. I wish I had time to finish
this, but I don't -- it has proved very useful to us on our gcj work.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Publishing test results
2000-12-30 6:08 Publishing test results Andrew Cagney
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-07-31 23:15 ` Jeffrey A Law
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Sources for Courses
In message < 398667D6.A803FC7D@cygnus.com >you write:
> Hello,
> Implementation wise, I've had suggested:
>
> o have the remote machine
> push results onto sware
> (means that the remote
> machine has an open
> ssh key around)
>
> o have sware pull
> results off of a remote
> machine
>
> o have results submitted
> via a mailing list...
>
> Does GCC use any of these?
GCC uses the last. However, I think the code sitting on the mailing list
went nuts a while back and hasn't been adding new data into the database.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Publishing test results
2000-12-30 6:08 Publishing test results Andrew Cagney
2000-07-31 23:01 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-08-03 1:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sources for Courses
Thanks for all the comments. I'm now working on HP ....
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Publishing test results
2000-12-30 6:08 Publishing test results Andrew Cagney
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-08-01 13:09 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: overseers
> o have results submitted via a mailing list...
This is what I'd recommend too. This is what mozilla.org does for
example (their test result summarizer is called tinderbox).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Publishing test results
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 Andrew Cagney
2000-07-31 23:01 ` Andrew Cagney
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sources for Courses
Hello,
I'm looking guidelines on how to add a proper test results section to
GDB's web pages. At present GDB has:
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/#testing which, among other things, points
to non GDB web pages ....
Looking around I note that GCC has: http://gcc.gnu.org/testresults/ .
I'm first wondering if anyone has comments on this or suggestions for
what ways of getting results published would be acceptable (from a
sware/security standpoint).
Implementation wise, I've had suggested:
o have the remote machine
push results onto sware
(means that the remote
machine has an open
ssh key around)
o have sware pull
results off of a remote
machine
o have results submitted
via a mailing list...
Does GCC use any of these?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-30 6:08 Publishing test results Andrew Cagney
2000-07-31 23:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-08-03 1:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Tom Tromey
2000-08-01 13:19 ` Tom Tromey
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-08-01 13:09 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-07-31 23:15 ` Jeffrey A Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).