* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-06-28 23:42 ` ian at airs dot com
2010-07-15 23:04 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (28 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2010-06-28 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |overseers at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-06-28 23:42 ` ian at airs dot com
@ 2010-07-15 23:04 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-07-19 12:00 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
` (27 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-07-15 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #27 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-07-15 23:04 -------
For those who are interested, I'm on vacation till mid-August, meaning that I
have some free time to help upgrading GCC Bugzilla to 3.6.1.
As it's not acceptable to play with a production installation, we would need a
test installation on which we can apply patches and test them (we could file
bugs and attach patches to the test installation directly, so that we can test
the installation for real). Once everybody is happy with how things work, and
thinks everything which is needed has been ported to the new installation, we
can make a monolithic patch with all changes in it, and attach it to this bug
for the record (as the test installation will probably go away once the upgrade
process is complete).
The only efficient way I know to customize a Bugzilla installation is to use
e.g. CVS or bzr to apply patches, and let the test installation be upgraded
from there, so that we can easily generate patches and back them out. Else it's
going to be a mess pretty quickly. Is this doable by the GCC team? Else I would
have to do it locally, and apply patches manually to the test installation,
meaning that I would be the only one able to generate patches on top of other
patches.
What do you think?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-06-28 23:42 ` ian at airs dot com
2010-07-15 23:04 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-07-19 12:00 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2010-08-09 22:21 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (26 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at dberlin dot org @ 2010-07-19 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2620 bytes --]
------- Comment #28 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-19 12:00 -------
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:04 PM, LpSolit at netscape dot net
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #27 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-07-15 23:04 -------
> For those who are interested, I'm on vacation till mid-August, meaning that I
> have some free time to help upgrading GCC Bugzilla to 3.6.1.
>
> As it's not acceptable to play with a production installation, we would need a
> test installation on which we can apply patches and test them (we could file
> bugs and attach patches to the test installation directly, so that we can test
> the installation for real).
That's fine.
I used to do this on my local machine (home.dberlin.org).
You could also setup a test instance on sourceware.org (which is what
gcc.gnu.org is really running on)
> Once everybody is happy with how things work, and
> thinks everything which is needed has been ported to the new installation, we
> can make a monolithic patch with all changes in it, and attach it to this bug
> for the record (as the test installation will probably go away once the upgrade
> process is complete).
>
Sounds right
> The only efficient way I know to customize a Bugzilla installation is to use
> e.g. CVS or bzr to apply patches, and let the test installation be upgraded
> from there, so that we can easily generate patches and back them out. Else it's
> going to be a mess pretty quickly. Is this doable by the GCC team?
Currently bugzilla is under cvs, but it's a bit of a mess (my fault,
of course ;P).
The rest of GCC uses SVN, the www stuff has never been moved over
because there are a bunch of automated checkin scripts/etc that nobody
has had the urge to port.
> Else I would
> have to do it locally, and apply patches manually to the test installation,
> meaning that I would be the only one able to generate patches on top of other
> patches.
>
> What do you think?
I think you should probably set yourself up an account on sourceware.
Fill out this form: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi and
list me as your referrer.
The bugzilla stuff for GCC is in /www/gcc/bugzilla
I honestly do not remember the qmail related magic that makes the
incoming aliases go to the right perl scripts.
However, overseers@ has the folks who set this up and understand how
qmail works.
--Dan
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-19 12:00 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
@ 2010-08-09 22:21 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-07 14:59 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (25 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-08-09 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #29 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-08-09 22:21 -------
(In reply to comment #28)
> I think you should probably set yourself up an account on sourceware.
> Fill out this form: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi and
> list me as your referrer.
Done! I selected "sourceware" as project. I hope that was the correct one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-09 22:21 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-07 14:59 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-07 16:16 ` Christopher Faylor
2010-09-07 15:51 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (24 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 1 reply; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-07 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #30 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 14:54 -------
Daniel, did you get the email I sent you on August 19? I need some help to
start working on this project.
Just in case someone else can help too, here is the content of the email I sent
to Daniel:
The welcome email I got contains this command, which doesn't work:
$ cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpsolit@sourceware.org:/cvs/sourceware co sourceware
cvs server: cannot find module `sourceware' - ignored
cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
Same for this broken link:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/sourceware?cvsroot=sourceware
I saw that the Bugzilla code is located at /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/bugzilla/.
How am I supposed to access it, then? Have I been added to the wrong
group? I also tried:
$ cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpsolit@sourceware.org:/cvs/gcc/wwwdocs co bugzilla
Cannot access /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/CVSROOT
No such file or directory
Is the welcome message obsolete or am I doing something wrong?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
2010-09-07 14:59 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-07 16:16 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2010-09-07 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers, LpSolit
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:54:29PM -0000, LpSolit at netscape dot net wrote:
>Daniel, did you get the email I sent you on August 19? I need some help to
>start working on this project.
>
>Just in case someone else can help too, here is the content of the email I sent
>to Daniel:
>
>The welcome email I got contains this command, which doesn't work:
>
>$ cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpsolit@sourceware.org:/cvs/sourceware co sourceware
>cvs server: cannot find module `sourceware' - ignored
>cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
That's true. There is no sourceware module. The welcome message was
intended for real projects like gcc or gdb. "sourceware" isn't one of
those so the script which generates the welcome message got confused.
>Same for this broken link:
>
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/sourceware?cvsroot=sourceware
>
>I saw that the Bugzilla code is located at /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/bugzilla/.
>How am I supposed to access it, then? Have I been added to the wrong
>group? I also tried:
>
>$ cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpsolit@sourceware.org:/cvs/gcc/wwwdocs co bugzilla
>Cannot access /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/CVSROOT
>No such file or directory
Sourceware currently (and unfortunately) has two bugzilla installations,
both of which apparently come from /cvs/gcc.
So, you need to do something like.
cvs -d :ext:lpsolit@sourceware.org:/cvs/gcc co wwwdocs/bugzilla
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 14:59 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-07 15:51 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-07 16:16 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
` (23 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-07 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #31 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 15:50 -------
(In reply to comment #30)
> $ cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpsolit@sourceware.org:/cvs/sourceware co sourceware
> cvs server: cannot find module `sourceware' - ignored
> cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
Use the module name "infra" instead:
cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpsolit@sourceware.org:/cvs/sourceware co infra
I haven't looked at the welcome instructions in a long time, but they
are auto-generated, so maybe they are misleading in this case.
> I saw that the Bugzilla code is located at /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/bugzilla/.
> How am I supposed to access it, then? Have I been added to the wrong
> group? I also tried:
>
> $ cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpsolit@sourceware.org:/cvs/gcc/wwwdocs co bugzilla
Check out the wwwdocs module from gcc's cvs repository:
cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpsolit@sourceware.org:/cvs/gcc co wwwdocs
There are actually 2 bugzilla instances running on sourceware.
I am not certain that the second one is in cvs at all.
Also, of course, the databases are not in cvs, you will have to get them
by some other means.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 15:51 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-07 16:16 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
2010-09-07 16:17 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
` (22 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: gerald at pfeifer dot com @ 2010-09-07 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #32 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2010-09-07 16:15 -------
I believe the following should work:
cvs -z9 -d :ext:lpsolit@gcc.gnu.org:/cvs/gcc co wwwdocs
bugzilla is a subdirectory there, not a module. sourceware.org and
gcc.gnu.org should both work, but since is GCC Bugzilla and I am using
the gcc.gnu.org server name, I figured I'd provide those. :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 16:16 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
@ 2010-09-07 16:17 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
2010-09-07 16:23 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (21 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: gerald at pfeifer dot com @ 2010-09-07 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
--
gerald at pfeifer dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet| |gerald@pfeifer.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 16:17 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
@ 2010-09-07 16:23 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-07 17:45 ` tom dot browder at gmail dot com
` (20 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-07 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #33 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 16:22 -------
I guess you meant to be CC'ed?
--
LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gerald at pfeifer dot com
GCC build triplet|gerald@pfeifer.com |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 16:23 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-07 17:45 ` tom dot browder at gmail dot com
2010-09-07 17:58 ` tom dot browder at gmail dot com
` (19 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: tom dot browder at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-07 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
--
tom dot browder at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tom dot browder at gmail dot
| |com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 17:45 ` tom dot browder at gmail dot com
@ 2010-09-07 17:58 ` tom dot browder at gmail dot com
2010-09-07 18:11 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (18 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: tom dot browder at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-07 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #34 from tom dot browder at gmail dot com 2010-09-07 17:58 -------
(In reply to comment #33)
> I guess you meant to be CC'ed?
>
Yes. The work I started was a Perl script to convert a 2.20+ database to the
latest version. The last question I had of Daniel was could we get a test bed
so others could try out the new bugzilla setup--looks like that is underway.
There was another problem I had that I don't remember at the moment, but that
was where I left it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 17:58 ` tom dot browder at gmail dot com
@ 2010-09-07 18:11 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-07 18:17 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (17 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-07 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #35 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 18:11 -------
(In reply to comment #34)
> The last question I had of Daniel was could we get a test bed
> so others could try out the new bugzilla setup--looks like that is underway.
Yes, we will have a test installation, as discussed in comment 27. But I first
need shell access, which is why I'm blocked right now. Waiting for Daniel or
someone else for help here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 18:11 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-07 18:17 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-09-07 21:38 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (16 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-09-07 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #36 from fche at redhat dot com 2010-09-07 18:16 -------
You're all set with plain shell access now.
Connect to irc.freenode.net #overseers for any further needs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 18:17 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-09-07 21:38 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-09-07 22:50 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-09-07 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
--
fche at redhat dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |LpSolit at netscape dot net
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 21:38 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-09-07 22:50 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2010-09-07 22:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (14 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at dberlin dot org @ 2010-09-07 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1107 bytes --]
------- Comment #37 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 22:50 -------
Subject: Re: Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
You should have shell access, do you not?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:11 PM, LpSolit at netscape dot net
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #35 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 18:11 -------
> (In reply to comment #34)
>> The last question I had of Daniel was could we get a test bed
>> so others could try out the new bugzilla setup--looks like that is underway.
>
> Yes, we will have a test installation, as discussed in comment 27. But I first
> need shell access, which is why I'm blocked right now. Waiting for Daniel or
> someone else for help here.
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 22:50 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
@ 2010-09-07 22:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-08 21:36 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (13 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-07 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #38 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-07 22:54 -------
(In reply to comment #37)
> You should have shell access, do you not?
I have now, yes, thanks to fche, see comment 36.
I now have a working local copy of GCC Bugzilla to play with (both code and
DB). I have one question for you, Daniel: what is the extra_emails DB table
used for?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-07 22:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-08 21:36 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-09 22:43 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (12 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-08 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #39 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-08 21:35 -------
I have done some progress. The DB has been successfully upgraded to 3.6.2
(locally, of course), and I have converted GCC hardcoded columns into custom
fields, i.e. using offically supported features in Bugzilla 3.x. So I will be
able to install a test installation on the server soon, so that you can have a
first look at the new installation.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-08 21:36 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-09 22:43 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-10 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-09 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #40 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-09 22:43 -------
A test installation based on a copy of the GCC Bugzilla database (snapshot
taken today, September 9) and upgraded to Bugzilla 3.6.2 is now live at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/.
Please give it a look, and file bugs related to missing or broken
customizations in the new "Bugzilla" product on the test installation, i.e.
using this link:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla
Note that I didn't port *any* customization yet, so you probably have a lot to
say. ;)
--
LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-
| |test/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-09 22:43 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-10 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 9:58 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (10 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-10 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #41 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 09:33 -------
(In reply to comment #40)
> A test installation based on a copy of the GCC Bugzilla database (snapshot
> taken today, September 9) and upgraded to Bugzilla 3.6.2 is now live at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/.
>
> Please give it a look, and file bugs related to missing or broken
> customizations in the new "Bugzilla" product on the test installation, i.e.
> using this link:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla
>
> Note that I didn't port *any* customization yet, so you probably have a lot to
> say. ;)
You probably should announce this on gcc@gcc.gnu.org.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-10 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-10 9:58 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-09-10 10:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2010-09-10 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #42 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-09-10 09:58 -------
(In reply to comment #40)
> Please give it a look, and file bugs related to missing or broken
> customizations in the new "Bugzilla" product on the test installation, i.e.
> using this link:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla
FYI, I can't login to the new bugzilla because my current password is 5 chars,
which seemingly is less than the minimum for the new bugzilla.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-10 9:58 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2010-09-10 10:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 10:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (8 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-10 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #43 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 10:29 -------
" The attachment is not viewable in your browser due to security restrictions
enabled by Bugzilla. In order to view the attachment, you first have to
download it."
I think at least text/* attachments should be shown. I think the restriction is
to avoid problems with, e.g., HTML attachments, which can steal cookies. Thus
some sites (like bugzilla.mozilla.org) use a different (sub)domain for the
attachments. (A different subdomain would be fine for me as well - as would be
HTTPS [at least for the login] but I think that's an item for overseers.)
In any case, I would like to see the possibility to view patches and examples
w/o downloading. Example:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/attachment.cgi?id=21126&action=edit
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-10 10:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-10 10:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-10 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-10 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #44 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-10 10:34 -------
(In reply to comment #43)
> I think at least text/* attachments should be shown.
Ah yes, sorry, I forgot to enable the allow_attachment_display parameter (which
is off by default). This is now fixed. Thanks for catching that! :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-10 10:34 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-10 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-12 20:24 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (6 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-10 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #45 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 10:46 -------
The Log In line in elinks looks quite weird. There is
a text field Bugzilla_login, then Bugzilla_password (both expected), but then
there is another text field prefilled with password:
<input id="Bugzilla_login_top"
class="bz_login"
name="Bugzilla_login"
onfocus="mini_login_on_focus('_top')"
>
<input class="bz_password"
id="Bugzilla_password_top"
name="Bugzilla_password"
type="password"
>
<input class="bz_password bz_default_hidden bz_mini_login_help" type="text"
id="Bugzilla_password_dummy_top" value="password"
onfocus="mini_login_on_focus('_top')"
>
Took me a while to figure out one shouldn't input password in there...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-10 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-12 20:24 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-15 21:17 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (5 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-12 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #46 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-12 20:24 -------
I read the patch attached to this bug, and I created a TODO list from it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla-test/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=%3ABugzilla
Tell me if some of these features are no longer needed, to not make me waste my
time. Also file a bug (on the test installation) if I missed something which
should be ported to the new installation. I intentionally ignored all scripts
in the contrib/ directory, because I'm pretty sure everything can already be
accomplished with the official email_in.pl script. There are also some minor
tweaks which I ignored as they don't seem important enough, at least for now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-12 20:24 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-15 21:17 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-16 22:51 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-15 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #47 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-15 21:16 -------
Per the email Ian sent a few minutes ago, we will upgrade Bugzilla this Friday,
September 17, for three hours starting at 18:00 GMT (11:00 PDT).
So *please* give a try at our test installation, and report any problem with it
asap.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-15 21:17 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-16 22:51 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-20 21:43 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-16 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #49 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-16 22:51 -------
(In reply to comment #48)
> The current bugzilla has
> extra separating lines with the column names. The new installation does not.
Yeah, it is so by design. Not something I'm going to reimplement.
Note that we finally won't upgrade tomorrow. I have severe hardware failures
with my PC, and I cannot reliably run the upgrade process under these
conditions. It's a miracle when I can comment in a bug without seeing my PC
shut down for no reason. Sorry about that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-16 22:51 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-20 21:43 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-20 21:47 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-20 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #50 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-20 21:43 -------
Created an attachment (id=21851)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21851&action=view)
upgrade to 3.6.2 patch, final
Here is my last iteration of the patch for the 3.6.2 upgrade. This patch alters
core code.
I will attach the GCC extension separately.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-20 21:43 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-20 21:47 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-22 20:16 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-22 20:18 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-20 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #51 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-20 21:47 -------
Created an attachment (id=21852)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21852&action=view)
GCC extension for 3.6.2, final
Here is the final version of GCC extension itself. You untar it from the
bugzilla/ base directory, i.e. you will get bugzilla/extensions/GCC/.
Now is a good time to hammer the test installation. I prefer bugs to be
reported *before* the upgrade. If you see something wrong after the upgrade,
don't complain. :)
--
LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #19830|0 |1
is obsolete| |
Attachment #19831|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-20 21:47 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-22 20:16 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-09-22 20:18 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-22 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #52 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-22 20:16 -------
Created an attachment (id=21864)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21864&action=view)
upgrade to 3.6.2 patch, final (v2)
Based on recently filed bugs and on some changes which have been accepted
upstream meanwhile, here is an updated version of the core changes. This is the
version I plan to use tomorrow.
--
LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #21851|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread* [Bug web/43011] Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6
[not found] <bug-43011-18765@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-22 20:16 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-09-22 20:18 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
29 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-09-22 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
------- Comment #53 from LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-22 20:18 -------
Created an attachment (id=21865)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21865&action=view)
GCC extension for 3.6.2, final (v2)
And its extension counterpart.
I fixed all bugs reported yesterday and today, so we are ready to upgrade.
--
LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #21852|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread