* gcc-patches: Spam filter?
@ 2014-09-24 12:31 Jan-Benedict Glaw
2014-09-24 18:13 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2014-09-24 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1559 bytes --]
Hi!
In July, I discussed the problem of re-encoding PGP-MIME messages (which may
break signatures.) Yesterday, it seems one of my emails didn't get through
some (spam?) filter at all.
The email contained a largeish patch to GCC's MAINTAINERS file, thus
the patch contained a large number of email addresses, which I guess
may have triggered something.
Subject was "[PATCH] Put all MAINTAINERS email addresses into <...>", and
regarding my mailserver's log files, it went out of my box without a problem:
Sep 23 10:15:49 lug-owl postfix/pickup[2144]: 95444F0251: uid=1001 from=<jbglaw>
Sep 23 10:15:49 lug-owl postfix/cleanup[9286]: 95444F0251: message-id=<20140923081537.GF4144@lug-owl.de>
Sep 23 10:15:49 lug-owl postfix/qmgr[3706]: 95444F0251: from=<jbglaw@lug-owl.de>, size=53311, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
Sep 23 10:15:59 lug-owl postfix/smtp[10267]: 95444F0251: to=<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, relay=gcc.gnu.org[209.132.180.131]:25, delay=10, delays=0.48/0.01/2.6/7, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Queued! 1411460159 qp 24525 <20140923081537.GF4144@lug-owl.de>)
Sep 23 10:16:06 lug-owl postfix/smtp[10268]: 95444F0251: to=<law@redhat.com>, relay=mx1.redhat.com[209.132.183.28]:25, delay=18, delays=0.48/0.02/1.9/15, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 s8N8FoYg007644 Message accepted for delivery)
Sep 23 10:16:06 lug-owl postfix/qmgr[3706]: 95444F0251: removed
Any hint where it actually was thrown away, and how to work around it?
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-patches: Spam filter?
2014-09-24 12:31 gcc-patches: Spam filter? Jan-Benedict Glaw
@ 2014-09-24 18:13 ` Christopher Faylor
2014-09-25 4:26 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2014-09-24 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan-Benedict Glaw, overseers
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:31:02PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>Hi!
>
>In July, I discussed the problem of re-encoding PGP-MIME messages (which may
>break signatures.) Yesterday, it seems one of my emails didn't get through
>some (spam?) filter at all.
It's hard to say why you would have been blocked without the original email
but I've super-whitelisted you so you should now bypass all spam checking
(except for html-based email).
If you still have the original email, I wouldn't mind seeing it, If you
can gzip it and send it here
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-patches: Spam filter?
2014-09-24 18:13 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2014-09-25 4:26 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw @ 2014-09-25 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1124 bytes --]
On Wed, 2014-09-24 14:13:25 -0400, Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:31:02PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > In July, I discussed the problem of re-encoding PGP-MIME messages
> > (which may break signatures.) Yesterday, it seems one of my
> > emails didn't get through some (spam?) filter at all.
>
> It's hard to say why you would have been blocked without the
> original email but I've super-whitelisted you so you should now
> bypass all spam checking (except for html-based email).
>
> If you still have the original email, I wouldn't mind seeing it, If
> you can gzip it and send it here
Sure, it's properly saved. I'll attach it to this email and re-send it
later on.
Thanks for the help,
Jan-Benedict
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: "really soon now": an unspecified period of time, likly to
the second : be greater than any reasonable definition
of "soon".
[-- Attachment #1.2: MAINTAINERS-patch.mbox.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 14386 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-25 4:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-24 12:31 gcc-patches: Spam filter? Jan-Benedict Glaw
2014-09-24 18:13 ` Christopher Faylor
2014-09-25 4:26 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).