public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Is git server on sourceware.org in trouble?
@ 2020-04-11 15:07 H.J. Lu
  2020-04-11 15:08 ` H.J. Lu
  2020-04-11 15:13 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2020-04-11 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Overseers mailing list, Binutils, GDB, GNU C Library

I have been waiting for

numerating objects: 1878, done.
Counting objects: 100% (1777/1777), done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (719/719), done.
Writing objects: 100% (1718/1718), 1014.92 KiB | 13.71 MiB/s, done.
Total 1718 (delta 1312), reused 1324 (delta 993), pack-reused 0
remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1312/1312), completed with 29 local objects.

to finish for more than 10 minutes.  It looks like one of commit hooks
never returns.

-- 
H.J.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Is git server on sourceware.org in trouble?
  2020-04-11 15:07 Is git server on sourceware.org in trouble? H.J. Lu
@ 2020-04-11 15:08 ` H.J. Lu
  2020-04-11 15:13 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2020-04-11 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Overseers mailing list, Binutils, GDB, GNU C Library

On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 8:07 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have been waiting for
>
> numerating objects: 1878, done.
> Counting objects: 100% (1777/1777), done.
> Delta compression using up to 8 threads
> Compressing objects: 100% (719/719), done.
> Writing objects: 100% (1718/1718), 1014.92 KiB | 13.71 MiB/s, done.
> Total 1718 (delta 1312), reused 1324 (delta 993), pack-reused 0
> remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1312/1312), completed with 29 local objects.
>
> to finish for more than 10 minutes.  It looks like one of commit hooks
> never returns.

It took very LONG time for commit hook to finish.

-- 
H.J.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Is git server on sourceware.org in trouble?
  2020-04-11 15:07 Is git server on sourceware.org in trouble? H.J. Lu
  2020-04-11 15:08 ` H.J. Lu
@ 2020-04-11 15:13 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
  2020-04-11 15:21   ` H.J. Lu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2020-04-11 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Overseers mailing list; +Cc: Binutils, GDB, GNU C Library, H.J. Lu

Hi -

> to finish for more than 10 minutes.  It looks like one of commit hooks
> never returns.

Some git/hooks/update.* python script in your repo is doing a hideous
number of "git show HASH:every_single_file.c" operations.

- FChE

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Is git server on sourceware.org in trouble?
  2020-04-11 15:13 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
@ 2020-04-11 15:21   ` H.J. Lu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2020-04-11 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: Overseers mailing list, Binutils, GDB, GNU C Library

On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 8:13 AM Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@elastic.org> wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> > to finish for more than 10 minutes.  It looks like one of commit hooks
> > never returns.
>
> Some git/hooks/update.* python script in your repo is doing a hideous
> number of "git show HASH:every_single_file.c" operations.

I am working on my personal branch in binutils-gdb repo.  Can't binutils-gdb
hooks ignore commits on users/* branches?  Maybe I shouldn't use
binutils-gdb repo for my works on binutils at all.

-- 
H.J.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-11 15:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-11 15:07 Is git server on sourceware.org in trouble? H.J. Lu
2020-04-11 15:08 ` H.J. Lu
2020-04-11 15:13 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-04-11 15:21   ` H.J. Lu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).