[Fwd: failure notice]

[Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 108 bytes --]

Why did this get flagged as spam?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

[-- Attachment #2: failure notice --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2160 bytes --]

From: MAILER-DAEMON@mail.codesourcery.com
To: mark@codesourcery.com
Subject: failure notice
Date: 19 Feb 2007 21:11:30 -0000

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.codesourcery.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>:
209.132.176.174 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 spam score exceeded threshold

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <mark@codesourcery.com>
Received: (qmail 17209 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2007 21:11:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (mitchell@127.0.0.2)
  by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 19 Feb 2007 21:11:24 -0000
Message-ID: <45DA1274.5000800@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:11:16 -0800
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Organization: CodeSourcery, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kazu Hirata <kazu@codesourcery.com>
CC:  gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch] common.opt: Remove -ftree-lrs.
References: <200702172354.l1HNsXgd006908@sparrowhawk.codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <200702172354.l1HNsXgd006908@sparrowhawk.codesourcery.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Kazu Hirata wrote:

> I am not sure if I should follow the normal deprecation process.
> Please let me know if I should.
> 
> Bootstrapped on i686-pc-linux-gnu.  OK to apply?
> 
> Kazu Hirata
> 
> 2007-02-18  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	* common.opt (-ftree-lrs): Remove.
> 	* doc/invoke.texi (-ftree-lrs): Likewise.

The documentation patch is OK.  However, we should continue to recognize
(and ignore) the option, for backwards compatibility with old Makefiles.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713