Moving patch queue from dberlin.org to gcc.gnu.org

Moving patch queue from dberlin.org to gcc.gnu.org

[Daniel Berlin]

Does anyone mind if i move the GCC patchqueue from
www.dberlin.org/patches to gcc.gnu.org/patches?

(URL names not in issue here :P)

This will require installation of ruby and a bunch of packages.

Load wise, it is a fastcgi app that does no real CPU work. Just
database queries.  After running for 67 days, it has taken a total of
1 minute, 5 seonds cpu time.

dreamhost has screwed up again and made it so the fastcgi version
doesn't run, so it takes 3 or 4 seconds per page view now :(.

The real issue is that the ruby that ships with rhel4 is not new
enough (1.8.1 vs 1.8.4), so i'll have to hunt down a bunch of ruby
packages for rhel4.

It requires no new webserver modules or anything, since it uses the
same fastcgi stuff we already have installed.

--Dan

Re: Moving patch queue from dberlin.org to gcc.gnu.org

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>Does anyone mind if i move the GCC patchqueue from
>www.dberlin.org/patches to gcc.gnu.org/patches?
>
>(URL names not in issue here :P)
>
>This will require installation of ruby and a bunch of packages.

No problems here but I would like to know what packages you have to
install.  Is it safe to assume that they'll all be easily retrievable
via "up2date"?

cgf

Re: Moving patch queue from dberlin.org to gcc.gnu.org

[Matthew Galgoci]

> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:06:53 -0500
> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
> To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
> Subject: Re: Moving patch queue from dberlin.org to gcc.gnu.org
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >Does anyone mind if i move the GCC patchqueue from
> >www.dberlin.org/patches to gcc.gnu.org/patches?
> >
> >(URL names not in issue here :P)
> >
> >This will require installation of ruby and a bunch of packages.
>
> No problems here but I would like to know what packages you have to
> install.  Is it safe to assume that they'll all be easily retrievable
> via "up2date"?

should be

-- 
Matthew Galgoci
GIS Production Operations
Red Hat, Inc
919.754.3700 x44155

Re: Moving patch queue from dberlin.org to gcc.gnu.org

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:08:09PM -0500, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:06:53 -0500
>> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
>> To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
>> Subject: Re: Moving patch queue from dberlin.org to gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> >Does anyone mind if i move the GCC patchqueue from
>> >www.dberlin.org/patches to gcc.gnu.org/patches?
>> >
>> >(URL names not in issue here :P)
>> >
>> >This will require installation of ruby and a bunch of packages.
>>
>> No problems here but I would like to know what packages you have to
>> install.  Is it safe to assume that they'll all be easily retrievable
>> via "up2date"?
>
>should be

Dan has used some custom packages in the past so I wanted to make sure.

cgf

Re: Moving patch queue from dberlin.org to gcc.gnu.org

[Daniel Berlin]

On 1/17/07, Christopher Faylor
<cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >Does anyone mind if i move the GCC patchqueue from
> >www.dberlin.org/patches to gcc.gnu.org/patches?
> >
> >(URL names not in issue here :P)
> >
> >This will require installation of ruby and a bunch of packages.
>
> No problems here but I would like to know what packages you have to
> install.  Is it safe to assume that they'll all be easily retrievable
> via "up2date"?

I have to check what versions up2date has, but a quick glance shows
they have 1.8.1, not 1.8.4 :(
It's possible they manuallyy added whatever patches are needed.
>
> cgf
>