public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "LpSolit at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: overseers@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug Infrastructure/31546] Bugzilla upgrade
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:56:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31546-14326-9eAoOzhCEy@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31546-14326@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31546

Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING
                 CC|                            |LpSolit at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #0)
> Bugzilla versioning is complicated. We are on the 5.0.4 branch.  And
> sourceware.org and gcc.gnu.org have slightly different patches. But
> they are very close. We did pick up various patches from others.


Sourceware and GCC Bugzilla are indeed very close. I did very minimal changes
to both, see:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18330
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968


Bugzilla versioning was not complicated... till new upstream managers managed
to mess everything after I left the Bugzilla project in 2016.

Sourceware and GCC Bugzilla are currently both based on 5.0.4 because this
version is very stable, and the 5.0 branch is still alive (for now). There is
no valid reason to upgrade to 5.0.5 or 5.0.6, because they contain unacceptable
changes for a stable branch (I had a long discussion with the upstream project
leader last year who fully agrees with me). And there is currently no other
release you could upgrade to. Bugzilla 5.2 is not ready yet, and let be honest:
nobody cares about this branch. And we are far from a stable Bugzilla 6.0 (its
internal name is Harmony), which started as an internal branch from Mozilla
based on Bugzilla 4.4. There are many changes and new features in Bugzilla 5.0
which have not yet been "backported" to the harmony branch and which must be
implemented to fully support a 5.0 -> 6.0 upgrade.


> We should pick a branch/version we want to upgrade to.

There is currently no such branch/version, so I'm marking this bug as WAITING,
but you could as well close it as INVALID or WORKSFORME.


> When upgrading (and having to change the schema anyway)

It's common to have DB schema changes when upgrading from one major version to
the next. Nothing special here. The DB schema changes are made automatically by
checksetup.pl during the upgrade process. Nothing to worry about, as long as
you don't upgrade to 5.0.5 or 5.0.6.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-25 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-25 18:41 [Bug Infrastructure/31546] New: " mark at klomp dot org
2024-03-25 19:56 ` LpSolit at gmail dot com [this message]
2024-03-25 23:24 ` [Bug Infrastructure/31546] " mark at klomp dot org
2024-03-26 11:52 ` LpSolit at gmail dot com
2024-03-26 22:12 ` [Bug Bugzilla/31546] " mark at klomp dot org
2024-03-26 22:28 ` mark at klomp dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-31546-14326-9eAoOzhCEy@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).