public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "LpSolit at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: overseers@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug Infrastructure/31546] Bugzilla upgrade
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:52:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-31546-14326-ngh1Mg1VXF@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31546-14326@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31546

--- Comment #4 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3)
> That is unfortunate. To be honest I had hoped 5.2 could become a common
> release people could upgrade to from 5.0.x while we waited for 6.0 to become
> ready.

This is the plan, you are right, but upstream developers are focused on 6.0,
and so the 5.2 development is very slow (6 commits only in the last 6 months),
see the commit log:

https://github.com/bugzilla/bugzilla/commits/5.2/


And even the harmony (aka 6.0) branch is not very active:

https://github.com/bugzilla/harmony/commits/main/

So it will indeed take a while till they are released as stable.



> We can use this bug to make sure all patches/features we need/want are in
> 6.0.
> Like the patches mentioned in this bug and things like the RH sitemap code.

If there are specific features you want, and if they are not too invasive, they
could easily be implemented with the current version of Sourceware Bugzilla.
Please file separate bugs using Product:sourceware Component:Bugzilla (not
Infrastructure) and I can look at them. One example which comes to mind is
inline history. See how I did it for Mageia Bugzilla, which is also running
5.0.4:

https://gitweb.mageia.org/web/bugs/commit/?id=8d9c748a5e694fb544c082128c9756a0ca702334

(Note that I managed to loose my old SSH key when I bought my new PC, and so I
can no longer access sourceware.org using ssh. Someone from overseers would
have to help me if you want me to help with Bugzilla.)



> That might take a bit. But if we want to help speed this up we could
> contract someone to do the work.

One problem is that upstream reviewers and approvers are pretty inactive these
days. So IMO the problem is more related to reviewing stuff than to submit
patches. There are many patches waiting for review, including security patches.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-25 18:41 [Bug Infrastructure/31546] New: " mark at klomp dot org
2024-03-25 19:56 ` [Bug Infrastructure/31546] " LpSolit at gmail dot com
2024-03-25 23:24 ` mark at klomp dot org
2024-03-26 11:52 ` LpSolit at gmail dot com [this message]
2024-03-26 22:12 ` [Bug Bugzilla/31546] " mark at klomp dot org
2024-03-26 22:28 ` mark at klomp dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-31546-14326-ngh1Mg1VXF@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).