Patch was marked as spam (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

Patch was marked as spam (was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

[Simon Marchi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2570 bytes --]

Hi Overseers,

A patch of mine on the binutils-gdb mailing list has been marked as 
spam.  Would it be possible to get more information about why it was 
identified as spam, to see if I can fix the issue?

You should have all the info you need below, but if you need anything 
more I'll be happy to provide it.

Thank you,

Simon

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: 2016-11-24 10:33
 From: MAILER-DAEMON@smtp.polymtl.ca (Mail Delivery System)
To: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca

This is the Email Security Gateway at host barracuda.ebox.ca.

I'm sorry to inform you that the message below could not be delivered.
When delivery was attempted, the following error was returned.


<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>: host sourceware.org[209.132.180.131] said: 
552
     spam score exceeded threshold (in reply to end of DATA command)

Return-Path: <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1480001560-0c856e65d4b899b0001-fS2M51
Received: from smtp.electronicbox.net (smtp.electronicbox.net 
[96.127.255.82]) by barracuda.ebox.ca with ESMTP id Ujl4lUQZAM6S3xp1 
(version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 
Nov 2016 10:32:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca
X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 96.127.255.82
Received: from simark.lan (cable-11.246.173-162.electronicbox.net 
[173.246.11.162])
	by smtp.electronicbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E70440E7C;
	Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:32:39 -0500 (EST)
 From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: 
cable-11.246.173-162.electronicbox.net[173.246.11.162]
X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 173.246.11.162
X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 173.246.11.162
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Subject: [PATCH 21/22] Class-ify ui_out
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:32:27 -0500
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [PATCH 21/22] Class-ify ui_out
Message-Id: <20161124153228.25177-21-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.0
In-Reply-To: <20161124152428.24725-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
References: <20161124152428.24725-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp.electronicbox.net[96.127.255.82]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1480001560
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
X-Barracuda-URL: https://96.127.255.19:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 270788
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at ebox.ca
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -1001.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-1001.00 using global scores of 
TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=8.0

[-- Attachment #2: Delivery report --]
[-- Type: message/delivery-status, Size: 438 bytes --]

Re: Patch was marked as spam

[Simon Marchi]

On 2016-11-24 12:00, Simon Marchi wrote:
> Hi Overseers,
> 
> A patch of mine on the binutils-gdb mailing list has been marked as
> spam.  Would it be possible to get more information about why it was
> identified as spam, to see if I can fix the issue?
> 
> You should have all the info you need below, but if you need anything
> more I'll be happy to provide it.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Simon

Hi again,

I realized I was subscribed with address A and posted from address B 
(they are aliases).  I tried adding address B to the whitelist, as 
suggested here:

https://sourceware.org/lists.html#spam

So it's probably fine, sorry for bothering.

Simon