public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: rename: narrowing it down
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2hfc5x9a5.fsf@kelso.bothner.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200005111602.MAA11419@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

I like Sources.redhat.com, but I see your point that it might imply it
contains "all the source to Red Hat's products".  Solution: make sure
it does, or at least point to it.  I.e. if you call it
sources.redhat.com, then it should have a prominent pointer to where
source rpms, and other source to open-source redhat code.  It doesn't
have to be on the site itself, but there should be a pointer.  On the
other hand, if you want to compete with sourceforge, perhaps you don't
want to make the reference to redhat sources *too* prominent on the
page - but it must be prominentenough that people looking for redhat
sources can find them.

The same comments may apply to some of the other suggestions, but
less strongly.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/~per/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: rename: narrowing it down
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 10:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2hfc5x9a5.fsf@kelso.bothner.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20000511105800.HMd6EPOhgp0MzeyF3WAnjuCnB4PpOZCcnCu37q5bMQY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200005111602.MAA11419@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

I like Sources.redhat.com, but I see your point that it might imply it
contains "all the source to Red Hat's products".  Solution: make sure
it does, or at least point to it.  I.e. if you call it
sources.redhat.com, then it should have a prominent pointer to where
source rpms, and other source to open-source redhat code.  It doesn't
have to be on the site itself, but there should be a pointer.  On the
other hand, if you want to compete with sourceforge, perhaps you don't
want to make the reference to redhat sources *too* prominent on the
page - but it must be prominentenough that people looking for redhat
sources can find them.

The same comments may apply to some of the other suggestions, but
less strongly.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/~per/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-12-30  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-30  6:08 Jim Kingdon
2000-05-11  9:02 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30  6:08 ` LAST CALL on sources.redhat.com Jim Kingdon
2000-05-15 13:17   ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30  6:08 ` Per Bothner [this message]
2000-05-11 10:58   ` rename: narrowing it down Per Bothner
2000-12-30  6:08   ` Benjamin Kosnik
2000-05-12  9:58     ` Benjamin Kosnik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2hfc5x9a5.fsf@kelso.bothner.com \
    --to=per@bothner.com \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).