public inbox for rda@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>,
	rda@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 13:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021201212149.GC12876@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DE4E23E.5000104@redhat.com>

On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:18:22AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >Hi Christopher,
> >
> >does that mean that things like my RFC
> >[RFC] Correct gdbserver register packets
> >
> >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-11/msg00652.html
> >
> >about a modification to gdbserver should be discussed in that mailing list?
> 
> No.  GDBSERVER is part of GDB (which is part of the FSF's GNU project) 
> and it should continue to be discussed here.

I really wish we could come to some resolution about the overlap. 
Should we sacrifice the FSF-owned gdbserver project in favor of
extending RDA?  As it is, there's a substantial amount of duplicated
effort.  I hate seeing effort wasted.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-01 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20021127034054.GA1477@redhat.com>
2002-11-26 19:46 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-11-27  1:00 ` Pierre Muller
2002-11-27  7:18   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-01 13:21     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-12-01 14:50       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-01 15:19         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
     [not found]           ` <mailpost.1038784758.15335@news-sj1-1>
2002-12-02 12:02             ` Chris G. Demetriou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021201212149.GC12876@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
    --cc=rda@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).