* Where is the CVS repository?
@ 2000-07-23 18:46 Ben Elliston
2000-07-23 18:54 ` Mo DeJong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Elliston @ 2000-07-23 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sourcenav
I don't see any mention of anonymous CVS access for sourcenav. Is there any?
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Where is the CVS repository?
2000-07-23 18:46 Where is the CVS repository? Ben Elliston
@ 2000-07-23 18:54 ` Mo DeJong
2000-07-23 21:55 ` Mail Header without the Reply-To line Gilles J. Seguin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mo DeJong @ 2000-07-23 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Elliston; +Cc: sourcenav
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> I don't see any mention of anonymous CVS access for sourcenav. Is there any?
>
> Ben
Not yet. When 5.0 is ready it will be made available in the CVS on
sourceware. Until then, we will be providing snapshots to download.
Mo DeJong
Red Hat Inc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Mail Header without the Reply-To line
2000-07-23 18:54 ` Mo DeJong
@ 2000-07-23 21:55 ` Gilles J. Seguin
2000-07-23 23:55 ` Mo DeJong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gilles J. Seguin @ 2000-07-23 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sourcenav
Subject: Re: Where is the CVS repository?
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mo
Reply-To: S-N <sourcenav@sources.redhat.com>
To: Ben
Mo DeJong wrote:
>
(...)
We do not have the Reply-To line like in the example above, it has
been added manually.
I think the feature can save unwanted mail or redirection where
we want it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Mail Header without the Reply-To line
2000-07-23 21:55 ` Mail Header without the Reply-To line Gilles J. Seguin
@ 2000-07-23 23:55 ` Mo DeJong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mo DeJong @ 2000-07-23 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gilles J. Seguin; +Cc: sourcenav
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Gilles J. Seguin wrote:
> Subject: Re: Where is the CVS repository?
> Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mo
> Reply-To: S-N <sourcenav@sources.redhat.com>
> To: Ben
>
>
> Mo DeJong wrote:
> >
> (...)
>
>
> We do not have the Reply-To line like in the example above, it has
> been added manually.
>
> I think the feature can save unwanted mail or redirection where
> we want it.
I asked our admin guys about this. One of them responded that
changing the reply to field was actually a bad thing.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Mo DeJong
Red Hat Inc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-07-23 23:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-07-23 18:46 Where is the CVS repository? Ben Elliston
2000-07-23 18:54 ` Mo DeJong
2000-07-23 21:55 ` Mail Header without the Reply-To line Gilles J. Seguin
2000-07-23 23:55 ` Mo DeJong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).