* [Bug tapsets/10900] New: nfs tapset problems
@ 2009-11-03 22:24 dsmith at redhat dot com
2009-11-09 9:16 ` [Bug tapsets/10900] " wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2009-11-09 15:58 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-03 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
There are several problems in the nfs tapset. During testing I used:
- a x86_64 rhel5 system (kernel 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5)
- a ia64 rhel5 system (kernel 2.6.18-157.el5)
- a rawhide system (kernel 2.6.31.5-96.fc12.x86_64.debug).
- probes 'nfs.fop.fsync' & 'nfs.fop.fsync.return' didn't work on rawhide
- probes 'nfs.fop.sendfile' & 'nfs.fop.sendfile.return' didn't work on rawhide
- probes 'nfs.fop.check_flags' & 'nfs.fop.check_flags.return' don't work on
either ia64 rhel5 or rawhide. They did work on the x86_64 rhel5 system.
- probe 'nfs.aop.readpages.return' has a mistake in it. 'size = retstr' should
be 'size = $return' (to match the other return probes)
- probes 'nfs.aop.prepare_write' & 'nfs.aop.prepare_write.return' don't work on
either rhel5 or rawhide
- probes 'nfs.aop.commit_write' & 'nfs.aop.commit_write.return' don't work on
either rhel5 or rawhide
--
Summary: nfs tapset problems
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: tapsets
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: dsmith at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10900
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug tapsets/10900] nfs tapset problems
2009-11-03 22:24 [Bug tapsets/10900] New: nfs tapset problems dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-09 9:16 ` wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2009-11-09 15:58 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wenji dot huang at oracle dot com @ 2009-11-09 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From wenji dot huang at oracle dot com 2009-11-09 09:16 -------
seems duplicate with #5150
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10900
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug tapsets/10900] nfs tapset problems
2009-11-03 22:24 [Bug tapsets/10900] New: nfs tapset problems dsmith at redhat dot com
2009-11-09 9:16 ` [Bug tapsets/10900] " wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
@ 2009-11-09 15:58 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-09 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From dsmith at redhat dot com 2009-11-09 15:58 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> seems duplicate with #5150
Looks like it is.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5150 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10900
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-09 15:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-03 22:24 [Bug tapsets/10900] New: nfs tapset problems dsmith at redhat dot com
2009-11-09 9:16 ` [Bug tapsets/10900] " wenji dot huang at oracle dot com
2009-11-09 15:58 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).