public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
		lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
		systemtap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
		DLE <dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>,
		Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>,
		Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
		Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/3] Pass mm->flags to binfmt core_dump for bitflag  consistency
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113232307.GB21666@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091113231602.2DD2C100E@magilla.sf.frob.com>


* Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:

> To clarify, proc_coredump_filter_write() is the one place that can 
> change mm->flags during a core dump.  I don't think any other is 
> possible while all the other tasks sharing that mm are prevented from 
> running.  Is there any other way that mm->flags might change during 
> do_coredump()?
> 
> I don't see anything wrong with this change.  But (assuming that is 
> the only case), there is another approach we could take instead.  That 
> is, have proc_coredump_filter_write() do:
> 
> 	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> 	ret = mm->core_state ? -EBUSY : 0;
> 	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);

this would fix the (probably harmless) race too, but isnt the whole 
approach taken by the patch more robust, i.e. to take a snapshot of 
mm->flags value and pass it along coredump processing?

That makes it evidently immutable in the future too. It also makes the 
code a bit easier to read IMO - instead of get_dumpable() we use the 
mm_flags.

The only other observation i have is that for this parameter set:

  long signr, struct pt_regs *regs, struct file *file,
  unsigned long limit, unsigned long mm_flags)

we should probably introduce a coredump parameter struct, and pass that 
along:

struct coredump_params {
	long signr;
	struct pt_regs *regs;
	struct file *file;
	unsigned long limit;
	unsigned long mm_flags;
}

Had this been done in the past this present patch would be a lot simpler 
as well: we could have added mm_flags to coredump_params, instead of 
having to propagate it through ~6 function interface surfaces.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-13 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-13 22:52 Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-13 22:52 ` [PATCH -tip 3/3] Add get_signal tracepoint Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-13 23:53   ` Roland McGrath
2009-11-14  0:12     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:52       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-16 22:11         ` Roland McGrath
2009-11-16 22:40           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-16 23:01             ` Roland McGrath
2009-11-16 23:46               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-17  6:03         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-17 15:25           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-14  0:29     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-13 22:52 ` [PATCH -tip 2/3] Add coredump tracepoint Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-13 23:39   ` Roland McGrath
2009-11-14  0:00     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-14  0:02     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-14  0:06       ` Roland McGrath
2009-11-14  0:14         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-14  1:49           ` Roland McGrath
2009-11-14  0:26         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-13 23:09 ` [PATCH -tip 1/3] Pass mm->flags to binfmt core_dump for bitflag consistency Andrew Morton
2009-11-13 23:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 23:45     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-13 23:16 ` Roland McGrath
2009-11-13 23:23   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-13 23:30     ` Roland McGrath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091113232307.GB21666@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).