* [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers
@ 2009-11-05 13:57 fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-05 14:46 ` [Bug releng/10907] " fche at redhat dot com
` (37 more replies)
0 siblings, 38 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-05 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Summary: tracker: release 1.1 blockers
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: releng
AssignedTo: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com
BugsThisDependsOn: 9973,10013,10561,10601,10641,10653,10836,10848,10877,108
89,10905
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-05 14:46 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-05 18:28 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (36 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-05 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |10849
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-05 14:46 ` [Bug releng/10907] " fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-05 18:28 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-05 18:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (35 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-05 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |blockers-1.1
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-05 14:46 ` [Bug releng/10907] " fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-05 18:28 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-05 18:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-09 20:06 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (34 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-05 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |3672
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-05 18:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-09 20:06 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-10 18:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (33 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-09 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10849, which changed state.
Bug 10849 Summary: make MAXSKIPPED overflow trigger an error message
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10849
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-09 20:06 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-10 18:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-17 23:28 ` jistone at redhat dot com
` (32 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-10 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10877, which changed state.
Bug 10877 Summary: improve probe point error reporting
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10877
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-10 18:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-17 23:28 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2009-11-18 21:28 ` jistone at redhat dot com
` (31 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-17 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |10976
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-17 23:28 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-18 21:28 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2009-11-18 21:39 ` jistone at redhat dot com
` (30 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-18 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |10983
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-18 21:28 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-18 21:39 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2009-11-19 5:10 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (29 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-18 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10983, which changed state.
Bug 10983 Summary: Power tracepoints use the wrong header in 2.6.32-rc7
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10983
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-18 21:39 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-19 5:10 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-24 19:55 ` brolley at redhat dot com
` (28 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-19 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |10984
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-19 5:10 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-24 19:55 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2009-11-25 20:51 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
` (27 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: brolley at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-24 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10976, which changed state.
Bug 10976 Summary: Untrusted uprobes.ko.sig shouldn't be fatal for the privileged
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10976
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-24 19:55 ` brolley at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-25 20:51 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2009-11-28 18:44 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (26 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: mhiramat at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-25 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |11020
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-25 20:51 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-28 18:44 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-30 16:04 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (25 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-28 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10984, which changed state.
Bug 10984 Summary: restrict unprivileged mode operation to "stapusr" or similar
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-28 18:44 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-30 16:04 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-30 20:34 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (24 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-30 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |11034
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-30 16:04 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-30 20:34 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-30 20:36 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (23 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-30 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10653, which changed state.
Bug 10653 Summary: intermittent itrace crashes
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10653
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-30 20:34 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-11-30 20:36 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-02 21:18 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
` (22 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-11-30 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10836, which changed state.
Bug 10836 Summary: uprobes-provided pt_regs* are unreliable
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10836
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-11-30 20:36 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-02 21:18 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2009-12-03 20:37 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
` (21 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-02 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 11034, which changed state.
Bug 11034 Summary: review context struct allocation mechanism
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11034
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-02 21:18 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-03 20:37 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2009-12-07 21:23 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
` (20 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: mhiramat at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-03 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 11020, which changed state.
Bug 11020 Summary: SIGUSR2 file switching doesn't work with busy script
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11020
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-03 20:37 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-07 21:23 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2009-12-07 23:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (19 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-07 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10641, which changed state.
Bug 10641 Summary: -m NAME should be disabled in --unprivileged mode
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10641
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-07 21:23 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-07 23:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-14 16:59 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (18 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-07 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10641, which changed state.
Bug 10641 Summary: -m NAME should be disabled in --unprivileged mode
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10641
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-07 23:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-14 16:59 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-15 20:08 ` brolley at redhat dot com
` (17 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-14 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |11089
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-14 16:59 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-15 20:08 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2009-12-16 3:24 ` scox at redhat dot com
` (16 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: brolley at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-15 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 9973, which changed state.
Bug 9973 Summary: module signing for unprivileged users
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9973
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-15 20:08 ` brolley at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-16 3:24 ` scox at redhat dot com
2009-12-16 20:29 ` scox at redhat dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: scox at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-16 3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 11089, which changed state.
Bug 11089 Summary: process.mark() probes with same name trigger wrongly
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11089
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-16 3:24 ` scox at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-16 20:29 ` scox at redhat dot com
2009-12-18 17:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: scox at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-16 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10013, which changed state.
Bug 10013 Summary: Support ENABLED sdt probe macro
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10013
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-16 20:29 ` scox at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-18 17:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-21 19:22 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-18 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |11105
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-18 17:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-21 19:22 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-21 22:40 ` jistone at redhat dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-21 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10601, which changed state.
Bug 10601 Summary: user-space deref/registers in loc2c
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10601
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-21 19:22 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-21 22:40 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2009-12-22 2:00 ` brolley at redhat dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-21 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |11112
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-21 22:40 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-22 2:00 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2009-12-22 2:48 ` jistone at redhat dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: brolley at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-22 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10889, which changed state.
Bug 10889 Summary: stap --unprivileged not documented
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10889
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-22 2:00 ` brolley at redhat dot com
@ 2009-12-22 2:48 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2010-01-05 21:45 ` wcohen at redhat dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2009-12-22 2:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 11112, which changed state.
Bug 11112 Summary: printf memory dump (%m and %M) doesn't check bounds
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11112
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-22 2:48 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2010-01-05 21:45 ` wcohen at redhat dot com
2010-01-13 19:39 ` brolley at redhat dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: wcohen at redhat dot com @ 2010-01-05 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |11140
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-05 21:45 ` wcohen at redhat dot com
@ 2010-01-13 19:39 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2010-01-13 19:41 ` brolley at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: brolley at redhat dot com @ 2010-01-13 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From brolley at redhat dot com 2010-01-13 19:39 -------
Remaining work on 10641 (Using the cache and hashing using client specific data)
not serious enough to block.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn|10641 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-13 19:39 ` brolley at redhat dot com
@ 2010-01-13 19:41 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2010-01-13 19:49 ` jistone at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: brolley at redhat dot com @ 2010-01-13 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From brolley at redhat dot com 2010-01-13 19:41 -------
Additional work on 10905 (notification of certificate status for sysadmins in
the log) is not serious enough to block.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn|10905 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-13 19:41 ` brolley at redhat dot com
@ 2010-01-13 19:49 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2010-01-14 16:08 ` scox at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2010-01-13 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn|3672 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-13 19:49 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2010-01-14 16:08 ` scox at redhat dot com
2010-01-15 19:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: scox at redhat dot com @ 2010-01-14 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 11140, which changed state.
Bug 11140 Summary: SystemTap userspace marker in shared libraries cause probed program crash
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11140
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-14 16:08 ` scox at redhat dot com
@ 2010-01-15 19:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-01-15 20:02 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-01-15 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 11105, which changed state.
Bug 11105 Summary: check/fix vulnerability of stap-server to spacious incoming arguments
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11105
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-15 19:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-01-15 20:02 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-01-15 20:32 ` fche at redhat dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-01-15 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 10848, which changed state.
Bug 10848 Summary: enforcement of memory limits
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10848
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-15 20:02 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-01-15 20:32 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-02-05 17:59 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-02-12 19:00 ` fche at redhat dot com
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-01-15 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2010-01-15 20:32 -------
ready to go
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-15 20:32 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-02-05 17:59 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-02-12 19:00 ` fche at redhat dot com
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-02-05 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 11105, which changed state.
Bug 11105 Summary: check/fix vulnerability of stap-server to spacious incoming arguments
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11105
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
* [Bug releng/10907] tracker: release 1.1 blockers
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
2010-02-05 17:59 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-02-12 19:00 ` fche at redhat dot com
37 siblings, 0 replies; 39+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-02-12 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
--
Bug 10907 depends on bug 11105, which changed state.
Bug 11105 Summary: check/fix vulnerability of stap-server to spacious incoming arguments
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11105
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10907
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 39+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-12 19:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-05 13:57 [Bug releng/10907] New: tracker: release 1.1 blockers fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-05 14:46 ` [Bug releng/10907] " fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-05 18:28 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-05 18:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-09 20:06 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-10 18:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-17 23:28 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2009-11-18 21:28 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2009-11-18 21:39 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2009-11-19 5:10 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-24 19:55 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2009-11-25 20:51 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2009-11-28 18:44 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-30 16:04 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-30 20:34 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-11-30 20:36 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-02 21:18 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2009-12-03 20:37 ` mhiramat at redhat dot com
2009-12-07 21:23 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2009-12-07 23:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-14 16:59 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-15 20:08 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2009-12-16 3:24 ` scox at redhat dot com
2009-12-16 20:29 ` scox at redhat dot com
2009-12-18 17:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-21 19:22 ` fche at redhat dot com
2009-12-21 22:40 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2009-12-22 2:00 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2009-12-22 2:48 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2010-01-05 21:45 ` wcohen at redhat dot com
2010-01-13 19:39 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2010-01-13 19:41 ` brolley at redhat dot com
2010-01-13 19:49 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2010-01-14 16:08 ` scox at redhat dot com
2010-01-15 19:16 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-01-15 20:02 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-01-15 20:32 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-02-05 17:59 ` fche at redhat dot com
2010-02-12 19:00 ` fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).