public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gioele Barabucci <gioele@svario.it>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Gioele Barabucci via Systemtap <systemtap@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dtrace: Use deterministic temp file creation for all temp files
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:59:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3de411c4-8cbd-667b-a64e-aeeac297ea94@svario.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fsarm7m5.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

On 27/02/23 16:49, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> +def mktemp_determ(sources, suffix):
>> +    # for reproducible-builds purposes, use a predictable tmpfile path
>> +    sha = hashlib.sha256()
>> +    for source in sources:
>> +        sha.update(source.encode('utf-8'))
>> +    fname = ".dtrace-temp." + sha.hexdigest()[:8] + suffix
>> +    tries = 0
>> +    while True:
>> +        tries += 1
>> +        if tries > 100: # if file exists due to previous crash or whatever
>> +            raise Exception("cannot create temporary file \""+fname+"\"")
>> +        try:
>> +            wxmode = 'x' if sys.version_info > (3,0) else 'wx'
>> +            fdesc = open(fname, mode=wxmode)
>> +            break
>> +        except FileExistsError:
>> +            time.sleep(0.1) # vague estimate of elapsed time for concurrent identical gcc job
>> +            pass # Try again
>> +
>> +    return fdesc, fname
> 
> This looks like creating a file with a suitable name may block forward
> progress indefinitely?  Like from a previous crash of the tool?

Hi Florian,

yes, that's correct. This code will exit with a FileExistsError if a 
temporary file from a previous run are still around.

However this is not a new behavior: this piece of code is already in 
dtrace. What this patch does is using it for all intermediate tempfiles, 
not just for the final temporary files.

> It might be more robust to use a dedicated temporary directory and a
> predictable file name under that directory.

Doesn't this suffer from the same issue? If dtrace finds that 
predictable dir/file path it will exit (impeding a second run). Or am I 
missing something?

Regards,

-- 
Gioele Barabucci


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-27 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-27 12:13 Gioele Barabucci
2023-02-27 15:49 ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-27 15:59   ` Gioele Barabucci [this message]
2023-02-27 16:47     ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-27 17:15       ` Gioele Barabucci
2023-02-27 17:34         ` Florian Weimer
2023-02-28  3:46           ` Gioele Barabucci
2023-02-28 10:12             ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3de411c4-8cbd-667b-a64e-aeeac297ea94@svario.it \
    --to=gioele@svario.it \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).