From: "Stone, Joshua I" <joshua.i.stone@intel.com>
To: "David Smith" <dsmith@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@elastic.org>
Cc: <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: precompiled probing scenarios
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C56DB814FAA30B418C75310AC4BB279DCC41F4@scsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
On Friday, October 20, 2006 6:50 AM, David Smith wrote:
> Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>> Note that currently several tests in the testsuite fail after a
>>> first run to seed the cache because they don't expect to see the
>>> skip from pass 2 to pass 5.
>>
>> How do you mean they fail? -p3 or -p4 should still work.
>
> Here's what goes on. The '-p3' and '-p4' options still work. But,
> several run ('-p5') tests use testsuite/lib/stap_run.exp or
> testsuite/lib/stap_run2.exp. Those two tcl files expect to see "Pass
> [12345]" in the output. They get confused when only seeing "Pass
> [125]" and then think the test has timed out.
Would it make sense to print "dummy" pass 3/4 messages when a cached
version is used? Something like:
Pass 1: parsed user script and 53 library script(s) in
310usr/0sys/326real ms.
Pass 2: analyzed script: 1 probe(s), 0 function(s), 0 global(s) in
10usr/0sys/5real ms.
Pass 3: (cached) in 0usr/0sys/0real ms.
Pass 4: (cached) in 0usr/0sys/0real ms.
Pass 5: starting run.
The timing info doesn't need to be hardcoded zero, I just expect it
would be very small.
Side question - do you still use caching when someone calls '-p3' or
'-p4'? And with verbosity increased, what would this output, given that
you're not actually doing the work? (e.g., you wouldn't have a compiler
output on a cached pass-4.)
Josh
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-20 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-20 18:44 Stone, Joshua I [this message]
2006-10-20 19:26 ` David Smith
2006-10-20 19:32 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-20 19:50 ` David Smith
2006-10-20 20:13 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-23 20:36 ` David Smith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-25 18:54 Stone, Joshua I
2006-10-26 1:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-24 0:29 Stone, Joshua I
2006-10-24 15:16 ` David Smith
2006-10-20 20:51 Stone, Joshua I
2006-10-19 20:33 Stone, Joshua I
2006-10-19 20:41 ` David Smith
2006-10-06 19:08 Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-06 20:33 ` David Smith
2006-10-06 20:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-19 19:49 ` David Smith
2006-10-19 21:53 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2006-10-20 13:50 ` David Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C56DB814FAA30B418C75310AC4BB279DCC41F4@scsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=joshua.i.stone@intel.com \
--cc=dsmith@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@elastic.org \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).