* [Bug tapsets/14549] New: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures
@ 2012-09-06 9:09 mjw at redhat dot com
2012-09-06 14:16 ` [Bug tapsets/14549] " smakarov at redhat dot com
2012-09-20 21:05 ` smakarov at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2012-09-06 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14549
Bug #: 14549
Summary: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of
exelib.exp failures
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: tapsets
AssignedTo: systemtap@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: mjw@redhat.com
CC: smakarov@redhat.com
Classification: Unclassified
probefunc() and print_ustack() were recently changed causing lots of failures
in testsuite/systemtap.exelib/exelib.exp. Reverting this commit makes all
exelib.exp tests succeed again:
commit 4e4aaf10d022db0f607b9e729b1a7abd5decc1b4
Author: Serguei Makarov <smakarov@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Aug 17 16:27:44 2012 -0400
PR6580: rewrite simple to-be-deprecated backtrace functions in terms of new
ones
For now, avoid changing backtrace(), probemod(), or the functions that
depend on not running into MAXSTRINGLEN according to their documentation.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug tapsets/14549] probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures
2012-09-06 9:09 [Bug tapsets/14549] New: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2012-09-06 14:16 ` smakarov at redhat dot com
2012-09-20 21:05 ` smakarov at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: smakarov at redhat dot com @ 2012-09-06 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14549
--- Comment #1 from Serguei Makarov <smakarov at redhat dot com> 2012-09-06 14:15:59 UTC ---
Reverted relevant portions of the corresponding commit until I can figure out
what causes the regression.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug tapsets/14549] probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures
2012-09-06 9:09 [Bug tapsets/14549] New: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures mjw at redhat dot com
2012-09-06 14:16 ` [Bug tapsets/14549] " smakarov at redhat dot com
@ 2012-09-20 21:05 ` smakarov at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: smakarov at redhat dot com @ 2012-09-20 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14549
Serguei Makarov <smakarov at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Serguei Makarov <smakarov at redhat dot com> 2012-09-20 21:04:49 UTC ---
The current code in the repository passes exelib.exp with a rewritten
print_ustack(), but probefunc() has not been rewritten yet. The regression was
caused by the lack of support in commit 4e4aa for use of probefunc() in a
user-side probe. Knowing this, I should be able to avoid making that mistake
when rewriting probefunc() in future.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-20 21:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-06 9:09 [Bug tapsets/14549] New: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures mjw at redhat dot com
2012-09-06 14:16 ` [Bug tapsets/14549] " smakarov at redhat dot com
2012-09-20 21:05 ` smakarov at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).