public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tapsets/14549] New: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures
@ 2012-09-06  9:09 mjw at redhat dot com
  2012-09-06 14:16 ` [Bug tapsets/14549] " smakarov at redhat dot com
  2012-09-20 21:05 ` smakarov at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2012-09-06  9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14549

             Bug #: 14549
           Summary: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of
                    exelib.exp failures
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tapsets
        AssignedTo: systemtap@sourceware.org
        ReportedBy: mjw@redhat.com
                CC: smakarov@redhat.com
    Classification: Unclassified


probefunc() and print_ustack() were recently changed causing lots of failures
in testsuite/systemtap.exelib/exelib.exp. Reverting this commit makes all
exelib.exp tests succeed again:

commit 4e4aaf10d022db0f607b9e729b1a7abd5decc1b4
Author: Serguei Makarov <smakarov@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 17 16:27:44 2012 -0400

    PR6580: rewrite simple to-be-deprecated backtrace functions in terms of new
ones

    For now, avoid changing backtrace(), probemod(), or the functions that
    depend on not running into MAXSTRINGLEN according to their documentation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug tapsets/14549] probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures
  2012-09-06  9:09 [Bug tapsets/14549] New: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2012-09-06 14:16 ` smakarov at redhat dot com
  2012-09-20 21:05 ` smakarov at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: smakarov at redhat dot com @ 2012-09-06 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14549

--- Comment #1 from Serguei Makarov <smakarov at redhat dot com> 2012-09-06 14:15:59 UTC ---
Reverted relevant portions of the corresponding commit until I can figure out
what causes the regression.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug tapsets/14549] probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures
  2012-09-06  9:09 [Bug tapsets/14549] New: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures mjw at redhat dot com
  2012-09-06 14:16 ` [Bug tapsets/14549] " smakarov at redhat dot com
@ 2012-09-20 21:05 ` smakarov at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: smakarov at redhat dot com @ 2012-09-20 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14549

Serguei Makarov <smakarov at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Serguei Makarov <smakarov at redhat dot com> 2012-09-20 21:04:49 UTC ---
The current code in the repository passes exelib.exp with a rewritten
print_ustack(), but probefunc() has not been rewritten yet. The regression was
caused by the lack of support in commit 4e4aa for use of probefunc() in a
user-side probe. Knowing this, I should be able to avoid making that mistake
when rewriting probefunc() in future.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-20 21:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-06  9:09 [Bug tapsets/14549] New: probefunc and print_ustack changes cause lots of exelib.exp failures mjw at redhat dot com
2012-09-06 14:16 ` [Bug tapsets/14549] " smakarov at redhat dot com
2012-09-20 21:05 ` smakarov at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).