public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug dyninst/14709] New: Support process.function.return in stapdyn
@ 2012-10-11 19:47 jistone at redhat dot com
  2012-11-06  1:38 ` [Bug dyninst/14709] " jistone at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2012-10-11 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14709

             Bug #: 14709
           Summary: Support process.function.return in stapdyn
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: dyninst
        AssignedTo: systemtap@sourceware.org
        ReportedBy: jistone@redhat.com
    Classification: Unclassified


We should support process.function.return in stapdyn.  There's no such thing as
uretprobes here, of course, but BPatch_addressSpace::wrapFunction might do the
trick.  That might even be a better way to handle function entry probes too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug dyninst/14709] Support process.function.return in stapdyn
  2012-10-11 19:47 [Bug dyninst/14709] New: Support process.function.return in stapdyn jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2012-11-06  1:38 ` jistone at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2012-11-06  1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14709

Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> 2012-11-06 01:37:49 UTC ---
Commit 536f1261 adds return probes using the containing function's
BPatch_locExit.

RE the notion to mess with entry probes -- better not, actually, since a lot of
dwarf expressions depend on knowing where exactly we are instrumented.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-06  1:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-11 19:47 [Bug dyninst/14709] New: Support process.function.return in stapdyn jistone at redhat dot com
2012-11-06  1:38 ` [Bug dyninst/14709] " jistone at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).