public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug translator/14737] New: plt.return probes
@ 2012-10-17 21:22 fche at redhat dot com
  2014-01-16 20:58 ` [Bug translator/14737] " fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2012-10-17 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14737

             Bug #: 14737
           Summary: plt.return probes
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: translator
        AssignedTo: systemtap@sourceware.org
        ReportedBy: fche@redhat.com
    Classification: Unclassified


Current code limits PLT uprobes to entries only, but the structure should allow
uretprobes too.  The latter would be handy in order to draw fully nested
inter-library calls, measure times, etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/14737] plt.return probes
  2012-10-17 21:22 [Bug translator/14737] New: plt.return probes fche at redhat dot com
@ 2014-01-16 20:58 ` fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com
  2014-01-24 20:25 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2014-06-17 20:58 ` scox at redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com @ 2014-01-16 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14737

fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com

--- Comment #1 from fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com ---
I am wondering if anybody has made progress on PLT uretprobes? If not, then how
much of an effort would it take to implement it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/14737] plt.return probes
  2012-10-17 21:22 [Bug translator/14737] New: plt.return probes fche at redhat dot com
  2014-01-16 20:58 ` [Bug translator/14737] " fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com
@ 2014-01-24 20:25 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2014-06-17 20:58 ` scox at redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2014-01-24 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14737

--- Comment #2 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> ---
This capability remains undone.  It would require something like:

- tapsets.cxx register_plt_variants() should register some TOK_RETURN
alternatives
- tapsets.cxx query_one_plt() should look for that TOK_RETURN, and map such
  probes to .statement().return synthetic probes
- elsewhere nearby, we'd have to start supporting .statement(0xaddr).return
  probes and map them to the appropriate uretprobes.  This part could be
tricky.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/14737] plt.return probes
  2012-10-17 21:22 [Bug translator/14737] New: plt.return probes fche at redhat dot com
  2014-01-16 20:58 ` [Bug translator/14737] " fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com
  2014-01-24 20:25 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2014-06-17 20:58 ` scox at redhat dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: scox at redhat dot com @ 2014-06-17 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14737

Stan Cox <scox at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |scox at redhat dot com
           Assignee|systemtap at sourceware dot org    |scox at redhat dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-17 20:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-17 21:22 [Bug translator/14737] New: plt.return probes fche at redhat dot com
2014-01-16 20:58 ` [Bug translator/14737] " fahadaliarshad at gmail dot com
2014-01-24 20:25 ` fche at redhat dot com
2014-06-17 20:58 ` scox at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).