[Bug testsuite/15881] New: unprivileged_myproc.exp test fails on rawhide

[Bug testsuite/15881] New: unprivileged_myproc.exp test fails on rawhide

[dsmith at redhat dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15881

            Bug ID: 15881
           Summary: unprivileged_myproc.exp test fails on rawhide
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: testsuite
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: dsmith at redhat dot com

On rawhide (and elsewhere I believe), the unprivileged_myproc.exp testcase gets
8 FAILS:

====
Running ../../src/testsuite/systemtap.unprivileged/unprivileged_myproc.exp ...
FAIL: unprivileged myproc: --unprivileged
process(number).statement(number).absolute
FAIL: unprivileged myproc: --privilege=stapusr
process(number).statement(number).absolute.return
FAIL: unprivileged myproc: --privilege=stapsys
process.library(string).plt.statement(number)
FAIL: unprivileged myproc: --privilege=stapsys
process.library(string).plt(string).statement(number)
FAIL: unprivileged myproc: --privilege=stapsys
process(number).statement(number).absolute
FAIL: unprivileged myproc: --privilege=stapsys
process(number).statement(number).absolute.return
FAIL: unprivileged myproc: --privilege=stapsys
process(string).library(string).plt.statement(number)
FAIL: unprivileged myproc: --privilege=stapsys
process(string).library(string).plt(string).statement(number)

        === systemtap Summary ===

# of expected passes        267
# of unexpected failures    8
# of expected failures        4
# of known failures        12
# of untested testcases        8
====

The '.absolute' and '.absolute.return' failures aren't valid since inode
uprobes doesn't support those probe types.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug testsuite/15881] unprivileged_myproc.exp test fails on rawhide

[dsmith at redhat dot com]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15881

David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> ---
Fixed in commit eb3bed2. All failures are now fixed. In addition, the XFAILS
(that bug #13373 added) are fixed. The testcase was using the wrong address for
the 'library.plt.statement(number)' tests.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.