public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
@ 2014-02-15 23:05 mjw at redhat dot com
  2014-02-19 20:59 ` [Bug translator/16596] " jlebon at redhat dot com
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2014-02-15 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

            Bug ID: 16596
           Summary: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: translator
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: mjw at redhat dot com

Newer GCC releases might produce DWARF location expressions for more arguments
or variables using DW_OP_GNU_entry_value. loc2c currently doesn't support such
location expressions. The description of DW_OP_GNU_entry_value (as DWARF5
extension) can be found at http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=100909.1

DW_OP_GNU_entry_value provides an DWARF expression (that can be retrieved
through dwarf_getlocation_attr in libdw elfutils 0.157+ as a location
attribute). Any register op used in the DW_OP_GNU_entry_value expression needs
to be evaluated as the value that register had upon entering the subprogram.

Getting the value of the register at the start of the subprogram can be done in
several ways.

If the register was used to pass an argument to the function then it might be
retrieved through finding the DW_TAG_call_site with DW_AT_low_pc pointing to
the function. The DW_TAG_call_site_parameter with a DW_AT_location of the
register will have as value the DW_AT_GNU_call_site_value. Note that this
location expression itself might use registers that need to be evaluated in the
caller frame (so might need an unwind step, which might fail to restore the
value if that register was caller-saved). Since there might be multiple call
sites the found value depends on the return address of the current function at
runtime (so might need a lookup table at runtime).

If the register was callee saved it should be possible to retrieve the value of
the register on function entry through CFI. This might be possible at
translation time using dwarf_cfi_addrframe and dwarf_frame_register.

Finally the needed registers can be collected by introducing an extra probe at
the first instruction of the subprogram. That probe stores the needed registers
as thread local values that can be retrieved by the probe later in the function
that might need them. This might also need an extra retprobe on the function to
delete the copy of the registers again.

Some example location expressions using DW_OP_GNU_entry_value can be found in
the elfutils tests/run-varlocs.sh.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2014-02-19 20:59 ` jlebon at redhat dot com
  2014-03-05 16:42 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jlebon at redhat dot com @ 2014-02-19 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

Jonathan Lebon <jlebon at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jlebon at redhat dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
  2014-02-19 20:59 ` [Bug translator/16596] " jlebon at redhat dot com
@ 2014-03-05 16:42 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  2014-03-10  9:41 ` mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2014-03-05 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dsmith at redhat dot com

--- Comment #1 from David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> ---
Note that I'm seeing DW_OP_GNU_entry_value errors on rawhide x86_64
(3.14.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc21.x86_64) with HEAD systemtap:

====
# stap -vp4 -e 'probe kernel.function("__handle_mm_fault@mm/memory.c") {
print($flags) }'
Pass 1: parsed user script and 100 library script(s) using
211944virt/29108res/2876shr/26548data kb, in 220usr/70sys/291real ms.
semantic error: unhandled DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in DWARF expression [0] at 0
(0xf3: 1, 139892792287890): identifier '$flags' at <input>:1:64
        source: probe kernel.function("__handle_mm_fault@mm/memory.c") {
print($flags) }
                                                                              
^

Pass 2: analyzed script: 1 probe(s), 0 function(s), 0 embed(s), 0 global(s)
using 451824virt/112528res/24536shr/91000data kb, in 630usr/1250sys/1888real
ms.
Pass 2: analysis failed.  [man error::pass2]
====

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
  2014-02-19 20:59 ` [Bug translator/16596] " jlebon at redhat dot com
  2014-03-05 16:42 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2014-03-10  9:41 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  2014-03-13 17:14 ` mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2014-03-10  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to David Smith from comment #1)
> Note that I'm seeing DW_OP_GNU_entry_value errors on rawhide x86_64
> (3.14.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc21.x86_64) with HEAD systemtap:
> 
> unhandled DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in DWARF expression [0] at 0 (0xf3: 1, 139892792287890)

Could you try to get a bit more information about this? (We also might want to
extend the error/warning message since it doesn't provide the DIE offset where
this happened.) It would be nice to know exactly at which address stap places
the probe and which location list entry contained the DW_OP_GNU_entry_value.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-03-10  9:41 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2014-03-13 17:14 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  2014-03-14  8:50 ` mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2014-03-13 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> ---
OK, with extra -vv we see:

focused on module 'kernel'
selected source file 'mm/memory.c'
selected inline instance of __handle_mm_fault
entry-pc lookup (dwarf_entrypc dieoffset: 0x170f191) = 0xffffffff811e11a9 (rc
0)
querying entrypc 0xffffffff811e11a9 of instance of inline '__handle_mm_fault'
probe __handle_mm_fault@mm/memory.c:3696 kernel reloc=.dynamic
pc=0xffffffff811e11a9
finding location for local 'flags' near address 0xffffffff811e11a9, module bias
0
get_cfa_ops @0xffffffff811e11a9, module_start @0xffffffff81000000
found cfa, info: 16 [start: 0xffffffff811e112b, end: 0xffffffff811e153a, nops:
1

 [170f191]      inlined_subroutine
               abstract_origin      (ref4) [170ee49]
               entry_pc             (addr) 0xffffffff811e11a9
               ranges               (sec_offset) range list [112810]
               call_file            (data1) 4
               call_line            (data2) 3799
               sibling              (ref4) [1711432]
 [170f1a9]        formal_parameter
                 abstract_origin      (ref4) [170ee7d]
                 location             (sec_offset) location list [5dac88]
 [170f1b2]        formal_parameter
                 abstract_origin      (ref4) [170ee71]
                 location             (sec_offset) location list [5dacf0]
 [170f1bb]        formal_parameter
                 abstract_origin      (ref4) [170ee65]
                 location             (sec_offset) location list [5dae6e]
 [170f1c4]        formal_parameter
                 abstract_origin      (ref4) [170ee5a]
                 location             (sec_offset) location list [5dafd6]

The abstract origin of this inlined_subroutine is (as expected):

 [170ee49]    subprogram
             name                 (strp) "__handle_mm_fault"
             decl_file            (data1) 4
             decl_line            (data2) 3696
             prototyped           (flag_present) Yes
             type                 (ref4) [16f3cb4]
             inline               (data1) inlined (1)

And the first formal_parameter [170f1a9] origin is flags:

 [170ee7d]      formal_parameter
               name                 (strp) "flags"
               decl_file            (data1) 4
               decl_line            (data2) 3697
               type                 (ref4) [16f3cc6]

Which can be found through location list [5dac88]:

 [5dac88]  0xffffffff811e11a9..0xffffffff811e1544 [   0] GNU_entry_value:
       [   0] reg2
                                                  [   3] stack_value
           0xffffffff811e1573..0xffffffff811e1e7c [   0] GNU_entry_value:
       [   0] reg2
                                                  [   3] stack_value
           0xffffffff811e1e95..0xffffffff811e1fbe [   0] GNU_entry_value:
       [   0] reg2
                                                  [   3] stack_value
           0xffffffff811e1fdc..0xffffffff811e205f [   0] GNU_entry_value:
       [   0] reg2
                                                  [   3] stack_value

And the pc (ffffffff811e11a9) we are interested in the first range, which (like
all other ranges) indeed tells us the value can be recovered through the value
of reg2 as it was on entry of the subprogram (where this was inlined). Which
is:

 [170eff4]    subprogram
             external             (flag_present) Yes
             name                 (strp) "handle_mm_fault"
             decl_file            (data1) 4
             decl_line            (data2) 3779
             prototyped           (flag_present) Yes
             type                 (ref4) [16f3cb4]
             low_pc               (addr) 0xffffffff811e1110
             high_pc              (data8) 3919 (0xffffffff811e205f)
             frame_base           (exprloc) 
              [   0] call_frame_cfa
             GNU_all_call_sites   (flag_present) Yes


So if we look at the source and disassambly:

int handle_mm_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
                    unsigned long address, unsigned int flags)
{
        int ret;

        __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);

        count_vm_event(PGFAULT);
        mem_cgroup_count_vm_event(mm, PGFAULT);

        /* do counter updates before entering really critical section. */
        check_sync_rss_stat(current);

        /*
         * Enable the memcg OOM handling for faults triggered in user
         * space.  Kernel faults are handled more gracefully.
         */
        if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_USER)
                mem_cgroup_oom_enable();

        ret = __handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, address, flags);  // <= THIS INLINE

        if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_USER) {
                mem_cgroup_oom_disable();
                /*
                 * The task may have entered a memcg OOM situation but
                 * if the allocation error was handled gracefully (no
                 * VM_FAULT_OOM), there is no need to kill anything.
                 * Just clean up the OOM state peacefully.
                 */
                if (task_in_memcg_oom(current) && !(ret & VM_FAULT_OOM))
                        mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(false);
        }

        return ret;
}

ffffffff811e1110 <handle_mm_fault>:
handle_mm_fault():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/mm/memory.c:3781
ffffffff811e1110:       e8 2b 44 60 00          callq  ffffffff817e5540
<__entry_text_start>
ffffffff811e1115:       55                      push   %rbp
ffffffff811e1116:       41 89 c9                mov    %ecx,%r9d
ffffffff811e1119:       48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
ffffffff811e111c:       41 57                   push   %r15
ffffffff811e111e:       41 56                   push   %r14
ffffffff811e1120:       49 89 fe                mov    %rdi,%r14
ffffffff811e1123:       41 55                   push   %r13
ffffffff811e1125:       49 89 f5                mov    %rsi,%r13
ffffffff811e1128:       41 54                   push   %r12
ffffffff811e112a:       53                      push   %rbx
ffffffff811e112b:       48 89 d3                mov    %rdx,%rbx
ffffffff811e112e:       48 83 ec 70             sub    $0x70,%rsp
ffffffff811e1132:       65 48 8b 04 25 28 00    mov    %gs:0x28,%rax
ffffffff811e1139:       00 00 
ffffffff811e113b:       48 89 45 d0             mov    %rax,-0x30(%rbp)
ffffffff811e113f:       31 c0                   xor    %eax,%eax
get_current():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14
ffffffff811e1141:       65 48 8b 04 25 80 c9    mov    %gs:0xc980,%rax
ffffffff811e1148:       00 00 
handle_mm_fault():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/mm/memory.c:3784
ffffffff811e114a:       48 c7 00 00 00 00 00    movq   $0x0,(%rax)
mem_cgroup_disabled():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/include/linux/memcontrol.h:165
ffffffff811e1151:       8b 3d dd a6 ba 00       mov    0xbaa6dd(%rip),%edi     
  # ffffffff81d8b834 <mem_cgroup_subsys+0x54>
count_vm_event():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/include/linux/vmstat.h:37
ffffffff811e1157:       65 48 ff 04 25 58 0e    incq   %gs:0x1d0e58
ffffffff811e115e:       1d 00 
mem_cgroup_disabled():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/include/linux/memcontrol.h:165
ffffffff811e1160:       85 ff                   test   %edi,%edi
ffffffff811e1162:       75 14                   jne    ffffffff811e1178
<handle_mm_fault+0x68>
mem_cgroup_count_vm_event():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/include/linux/memcontrol.h:224
ffffffff811e1164:       be 0b 00 00 00          mov    $0xb,%esi
ffffffff811e1169:       4c 89 f7                mov    %r14,%rdi
ffffffff811e116c:       89 4d c0                mov    %ecx,-0x40(%rbp)
ffffffff811e116f:       e8 2c e6 03 00          callq  ffffffff8121f7a0
<__mem_cgroup_count_vm_event>
ffffffff811e1174:       44 8b 4d c0             mov    -0x40(%rbp),%r9d
get_current():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14
ffffffff811e1178:       65 48 8b 04 25 80 c9    mov    %gs:0xc980,%rax
ffffffff811e117f:       00 00 
check_sync_rss_stat():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/mm/memory.c:164
ffffffff811e1181:       8b 90 a8 06 00 00       mov    0x6a8(%rax),%edx
ffffffff811e1187:       8d 4a 01                lea    0x1(%rdx),%ecx
ffffffff811e118a:       83 fa 40                cmp    $0x40,%edx
ffffffff811e118d:       89 88 a8 06 00 00       mov    %ecx,0x6a8(%rax)
ffffffff811e1193:       0f 8f e3 0c 00 00       jg     ffffffff811e1e7c
<handle_mm_fault+0xd6c>
handle_mm_fault():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/mm/memory.c:3796
ffffffff811e1199:       45 89 cf                mov    %r9d,%r15d
ffffffff811e119c:       41 81 e7 80 00 00 00    and    $0x80,%r15d
ffffffff811e11a3:       0f 85 9f 03 00 00       jne    ffffffff811e1548
<handle_mm_fault+0x438>
__handle_mm_fault():
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/mm/memory.c:3704
ffffffff811e11a9:       41 f6 45 52 40          testb  $0x40,0x52(%r13)
ffffffff811e11ae:       0f 85 af 0c 00 00       jne    ffffffff811e1e63
<handle_mm_fault+0xd53>
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.13.fc21/linux-3.14.0-0.rc5.git2.1.fc21.x86_64/mm/memory.c:3707
ffffffff811e11b4:       49 89 dc                mov    %rbx,%r12
ffffffff811e11b7:       49 c1 ec 24             shr    $0x24,%r12
ffffffff811e11bb:       41 81 e4 f8 0f 00 00    and    $0xff8,%r12d
ffffffff811e11c2:       4d 03 66 40             add    0x40(%r14),%r12
ffffffff811e11c6:       49 8b 04 24             mov    (%r12),%rax

So between the start of the function ffffffff811e1110 and the first inlined
address ffffffff811e11a9 a lot happens that probably clobbers reg2/rcx, which
makes it non-trivial to retrieve. It does look like the value of flags is used
later so maybe GCC could provide its value differently, but I am not sure.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-03-13 17:14 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2014-03-14  8:50 ` mjw at redhat dot com
  2016-05-24 18:17 ` fche at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2014-03-14  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

--- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> ---
Note that for the example in comment #3 we cannot use the simple unwinding
approach number 2 from the description because r2 isn't saved at all. Looking
at the CFI:

 [ 7a590] FDE length=68 cie=[ 79ab0]
   CIE_pointer:              498352
   initial_location:         0xffffffff811e1110 <handle_mm_fault>
   address_range:            0xf4f

   Program:
     advance_loc 6 to 0x6
     def_cfa_offset 16
     offset r6 (rbp) at cfa-16
     advance_loc 6 to 0xc
     def_cfa_register r6 (rbp)
     advance_loc 4 to 0x10
     offset r15 (r15) at cfa-24
     offset r14 (r14) at cfa-32
     advance_loc 5 to 0x15
     offset r13 (r13) at cfa-40
     advance_loc 6 to 0x1b
     offset r12 (r12) at cfa-48
     offset r3 (rbx) at cfa-56
     advance_loc2 1039 to 0x42a
     remember_state
     restore r3 (rbx)
     advance_loc 2 to 0x42c
     restore r12 (r12)
     advance_loc 2 to 0x42e
     restore r13 (r13)
     advance_loc 2 to 0x430
     restore r14 (r14)
     advance_loc 2 to 0x432
     restore r15 (r15)
     advance_loc 1 to 0x433
     restore r6 (rbp)
     def_cfa r7 (rsp) at offset 8
     advance_loc 5 to 0x438
     restore_state
     nop
     nop
     nop
     nop
     nop
     nop
     nop

(I didn't save the CIE, but that didn't save it either.)

Unfortunately I don't have access anymore to this setup so cannot see whether
unwinding and finding the matching DW_TAG_call_site_parameter would work
(approach 1 in the description).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-03-14  8:50 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2016-05-24 18:17 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2017-05-15 19:49 ` jistone at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2016-05-24 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fche at redhat dot com
           Assignee|systemtap at sourceware dot org    |jistone at redhat dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-05-24 18:17 ` fche at redhat dot com
@ 2017-05-15 19:49 ` jistone at redhat dot com
  2017-05-15 19:50 ` jistone at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2017-05-15 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|jistone at redhat dot com          |systemtap at sourceware dot org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-05-15 19:49 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2017-05-15 19:50 ` jistone at redhat dot com
  2017-09-12 17:10 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  2018-11-13 16:08 ` fche at redhat dot com
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jistone at redhat dot com @ 2017-05-15 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jistone at redhat dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-05-15 19:50 ` jistone at redhat dot com
@ 2017-09-12 17:10 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  2018-11-13 16:08 ` fche at redhat dot com
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2017-09-12 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |zerg2000-sourceware.org@ast
                   |                            |ral.org.pl

--- Comment #5 from David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> ---
*** Bug 22000 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug translator/16596] Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions
  2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-09-12 17:10 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2018-11-13 16:08 ` fche at redhat dot com
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2018-11-13 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16596

Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|systemtap at sourceware dot org    |juddin at redhat dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-13 16:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-15 23:05 [Bug translator/16596] New: Support DW_OP_GNU_entry_value in location expressions mjw at redhat dot com
2014-02-19 20:59 ` [Bug translator/16596] " jlebon at redhat dot com
2014-03-05 16:42 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2014-03-10  9:41 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2014-03-13 17:14 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2014-03-14  8:50 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2016-05-24 18:17 ` fche at redhat dot com
2017-05-15 19:49 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2017-05-15 19:50 ` jistone at redhat dot com
2017-09-12 17:10 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
2018-11-13 16:08 ` fche at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).