public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug runtime/17953] New: systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6
@ 2015-02-10 13:52 mcermak at redhat dot com
  2015-02-10 13:53 ` [Bug runtime/17953] " mcermak at redhat dot com
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-10 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17953

            Bug ID: 17953
           Summary: systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: runtime
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: mcermak at redhat dot com

The systemtap.context/context.exp testcase regressed on rhel6/all arches.
Bisecting the source shows that:

* 1c9686814469bd99176394cda1b25caf258bda75 caused ppc64 breakage
* 992b22547d4b85052cbcb7db279b7101a30f799d caused breakage on remaining el6
arches.

For the record, on rhel7 this testcase only works on x86_64.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/17953] systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6
  2015-02-10 13:52 [Bug runtime/17953] New: systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6 mcermak at redhat dot com
@ 2015-02-10 13:53 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
  2015-02-10 14:03 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-10 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17953

Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ajakop at redhat dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/17953] systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6
  2015-02-10 13:52 [Bug runtime/17953] New: systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6 mcermak at redhat dot com
  2015-02-10 13:53 ` [Bug runtime/17953] " mcermak at redhat dot com
@ 2015-02-10 14:03 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
  2015-02-12 23:31 ` ajakop at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-10 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17953

--- Comment #1 from Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 8116
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8116&action=edit
test logs (related to commit 992b2254 bits)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/17953] systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6
  2015-02-10 13:52 [Bug runtime/17953] New: systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6 mcermak at redhat dot com
  2015-02-10 13:53 ` [Bug runtime/17953] " mcermak at redhat dot com
  2015-02-10 14:03 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
@ 2015-02-12 23:31 ` ajakop at redhat dot com
  2015-02-16 15:46 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ajakop at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-12 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17953

--- Comment #2 from Abe Jakop <ajakop at redhat dot com> ---
Could you test this with commit 5160c6f2d840c35a7fd1de5c3d176aa793dc51c9 (or a
later commit) to see if the problem still persists?

There is an issue with commit 992b22547d4b85052cbcb7db279b7101a30f799d that
causes the debug line info not to be stored because one of the initial checks
had the comparison sign backwards. This was fixed in commit
5160c6f2d840c35a7fd1de5c3d176aa793dc51c9.

As for the ppc64 breakage with commit 1c9686814469bd99176394cda1b25caf258bda75,
 if you have the test results, could you attach them, please?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/17953] systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6
  2015-02-10 13:52 [Bug runtime/17953] New: systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6 mcermak at redhat dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-02-12 23:31 ` ajakop at redhat dot com
@ 2015-02-16 15:46 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
  2015-02-18 15:56 ` [Bug runtime/17953] systemtap.context/context.exp new subtests for symfileline sometimes fail on rhel6 fche at redhat dot com
  2015-03-05 11:05 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-16 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17953

--- Comment #3 from Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 8132
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8132&action=edit
test logs

(In reply to Abe Jakop from comment #2)
> Could you test this with commit 5160c6f2d840c35a7fd1de5c3d176aa793dc51c9 (or
> a later commit) to see if the problem still persists?
> 
> There is an issue with commit 992b22547d4b85052cbcb7db279b7101a30f799d that
> causes the debug line info not to be stored because one of the initial
> checks had the comparison sign backwards. This was fixed in commit
> 5160c6f2d840c35a7fd1de5c3d176aa793dc51c9.

Tested with version 2.7/0.161, commit release-2.6-274-gbabad5b31b70 on top of
kernel-2.6.32-528.el6:


 6.7 S x86_64, i686
-------------------------
FAIL: symfile ()
FAIL: symline ()
FAIL: symfileline in pp ()


 6.7 S s390x, ppc64
-------------------------
FAIL: symfileline in pp ()


> As for the ppc64 breakage with commit
> 1c9686814469bd99176394cda1b25caf258bda75,  if you have the test results,
> could you attach them, please?

I'm attaching logs showing the difference (commit 5700d0b8d349 versus
1c9686814469).


I'm happy to share my testing boxes if needed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/17953] systemtap.context/context.exp new subtests for symfileline sometimes fail on rhel6
  2015-02-10 13:52 [Bug runtime/17953] New: systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6 mcermak at redhat dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-02-16 15:46 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
@ 2015-02-18 15:56 ` fche at redhat dot com
  2015-03-05 11:05 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2015-02-18 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17953

Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fche at redhat dot com
            Summary|systemtap.context/context.e |systemtap.context/context.e
                   |xp regressed on RHEL6       |xp new subtests for
                   |                            |symfileline sometimes fail
                   |                            |on rhel6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug runtime/17953] systemtap.context/context.exp new subtests for symfileline sometimes fail on rhel6
  2015-02-10 13:52 [Bug runtime/17953] New: systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6 mcermak at redhat dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-02-18 15:56 ` [Bug runtime/17953] systemtap.context/context.exp new subtests for symfileline sometimes fail on rhel6 fche at redhat dot com
@ 2015-03-05 11:05 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2015-03-05 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17953

--- Comment #4 from Martin Cermak <mcermak at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 8171
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8171&action=edit
fresh logs

$ grep -ril ^FAIL 
systemtap.el7.aarch64.log
systemtap.el7.ppc64.log
systemtap.el7.ppc64le.log
systemtap.el6.i686.log
systemtap.el7.s390x.log

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-05 11:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-10 13:52 [Bug runtime/17953] New: systemtap.context/context.exp regressed on RHEL6 mcermak at redhat dot com
2015-02-10 13:53 ` [Bug runtime/17953] " mcermak at redhat dot com
2015-02-10 14:03 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
2015-02-12 23:31 ` ajakop at redhat dot com
2015-02-16 15:46 ` mcermak at redhat dot com
2015-02-18 15:56 ` [Bug runtime/17953] systemtap.context/context.exp new subtests for symfileline sometimes fail on rhel6 fche at redhat dot com
2015-03-05 11:05 ` mcermak at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).