public inbox for systemtap@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug runtime/20286] New: probe handlers using hrtimers taking too long
@ 2016-06-21 20:39 dsmith at redhat dot com
  2016-06-21 21:18 ` [Bug documentation/20286] " dsmith at redhat dot com
  2016-06-21 21:39 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2016-06-21 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20286

            Bug ID: 20286
           Summary: probe handlers using hrtimers taking too long
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: runtime
          Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: dsmith at redhat dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

When running the full testsuite (in parallel mode, but I'm not sure it
matters), I see the following on the console (3.10.0-442.el7.ppc64):

[ 6881.740026] hrtimer: interrupt took 3721 ns

While that doesn't look too alarming, what it means is that the next timer has
already expired because the current timer callback took too long. I'm looking
at the source of hrtimer_interrupt() in kernel/time/hrtimer.c. Here's a comment
from there:

         * The next timer was already expired due to:
         * - tracing
         * - long lasting callbacks
         * - being scheduled away when running in a VM
         *
         * We need to prevent that we loop forever in the hrtimer
         * interrupt routine. We give it 3 attempts to avoid
         * overreacting on some spurious event.

We may need to lower MAXACTION for probes that use hrtimers or think of some
other way to not take too long in an hrtimer-based probe. This probably should
depend on the timer's frequency (i.e. the faster the timer, the less actions
should be allowed).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug documentation/20286] probe handlers using hrtimers taking too long
  2016-06-21 20:39 [Bug runtime/20286] New: probe handlers using hrtimers taking too long dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2016-06-21 21:18 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  2016-06-21 21:39 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2016-06-21 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20286

David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|runtime                     |documentation

--- Comment #1 from David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> ---
After a conversation with Frank Eigler, we're not sure there is much we can do
here. The probes are runing long because someone needed them to run long. If we
limit the runtime, then that just means that we block some types of probes
entirely. So, we'll continue to let them run, and perhaps skipping some.

I'll try to document this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug documentation/20286] probe handlers using hrtimers taking too long
  2016-06-21 20:39 [Bug runtime/20286] New: probe handlers using hrtimers taking too long dsmith at redhat dot com
  2016-06-21 21:18 ` [Bug documentation/20286] " dsmith at redhat dot com
@ 2016-06-21 21:39 ` dsmith at redhat dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dsmith at redhat dot com @ 2016-06-21 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: systemtap

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20286

David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> ---
Note added to stapprobes man page in commit 42b9738.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-21 21:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-21 20:39 [Bug runtime/20286] New: probe handlers using hrtimers taking too long dsmith at redhat dot com
2016-06-21 21:18 ` [Bug documentation/20286] " dsmith at redhat dot com
2016-06-21 21:39 ` dsmith at redhat dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).