* [Bug bpf/27820] New: abort() tapset not implemented in the bpf mode @ 2021-05-04 4:34 agentzh at gmail dot com 2021-07-14 16:23 ` [Bug bpf/27820] " me at serhei dot io 2021-07-19 15:55 ` me at serhei dot io 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: agentzh at gmail dot com @ 2021-05-04 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27820 Bug ID: 27820 Summary: abort() tapset not implemented in the bpf mode Product: systemtap Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bpf Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org Reporter: agentzh at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- To demonstrate: ``` $ /opt/stap/bin/stap --bpf -e 'probe begin { abort() }' ERROR: abort() not supported in eBPF backend ``` More info: ``` $ /opt/stap/bin/stap -V Systemtap translator/driver (version 4.5/0.183, commit release-4.4-145-g8ae1d1dcec48) Copyright (C) 2005-2020 Red Hat, Inc. and others This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. tested kernel versions: 2.6.32 ... 5.12.0-rc enabled features: BPF ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug bpf/27820] abort() tapset not implemented in the bpf mode 2021-05-04 4:34 [Bug bpf/27820] New: abort() tapset not implemented in the bpf mode agentzh at gmail dot com @ 2021-07-14 16:23 ` me at serhei dot io 2021-07-19 15:55 ` me at serhei dot io 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: me at serhei dot io @ 2021-07-14 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27820 Serhei Makarov <me at serhei dot io> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |me at serhei dot io --- Comment #1 from Serhei Makarov <me at serhei dot io> --- commit 371805aa0 adds abort() implementation which will terminate the currently running probe, unlike exit() A more stringent implementation would eliminate the delay between the probe exiting and stapbpf unloading the other probes, but at the cost of adding a global variable check to the start of every stapbpf probe. Uncertain that this is necessary (since even the stringent implementation does not terminate parallel probes). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug bpf/27820] abort() tapset not implemented in the bpf mode 2021-05-04 4:34 [Bug bpf/27820] New: abort() tapset not implemented in the bpf mode agentzh at gmail dot com 2021-07-14 16:23 ` [Bug bpf/27820] " me at serhei dot io @ 2021-07-19 15:55 ` me at serhei dot io 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: me at serhei dot io @ 2021-07-19 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: systemtap https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27820 Serhei Makarov <me at serhei dot io> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Serhei Makarov <me at serhei dot io> --- Thinking about this more, I believe the implementation I pushed works well enough to close this PR. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-19 15:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-05-04 4:34 [Bug bpf/27820] New: abort() tapset not implemented in the bpf mode agentzh at gmail dot com 2021-07-14 16:23 ` [Bug bpf/27820] " me at serhei dot io 2021-07-19 15:55 ` me at serhei dot io
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).