* [Bug bpf/28202] New: segfault: next statement seems to violate in_block() assumption
@ 2021-08-06 14:50 me at serhei dot io
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: me at serhei dot io @ 2021-08-06 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28202
Bug ID: 28202
Summary: segfault: next statement seems to violate in_block()
assumption
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bpf
Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
Reporter: me at serhei dot io
Target Milestone: ---
When translating a statement sequence, putting additional statements after
'next' seems to cause segfault as the statements are orphaned without a basic
block.
Found when adding 'next' statement in the middle of the bpf_tests/foreach.stp
end probe.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-08-06 14:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-06 14:50 [Bug bpf/28202] New: segfault: next statement seems to violate in_block() assumption me at serhei dot io
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).