* [Bug runtime/28511] New: Should --example imply -w ?
@ 2021-10-28 8:31 mcermak at redhat dot com
2021-10-28 20:05 ` [Bug runtime/28511] " fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: mcermak at redhat dot com @ 2021-10-28 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: systemtap
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28511
Bug ID: 28511
Summary: Should --example imply -w ?
Product: systemtap
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: runtime
Assignee: systemtap at sourceware dot org
Reporter: mcermak at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I tend to think/expect that --example is used for linux admin work, just like
strace etc. In that case, would it make sense to change the --example behavior
in a way that it implies -w ?
Here's an example without -w:
scr0 8.6 Server x86_64 # stap --example disktop.stp
WARNING: Potential type mismatch in reassignment: identifier 'root_dentry' at
/usr/share/systemtap/tapset/linux/dentry.stp:246:3
source: root_dentry = @cast(task, "task_struct",
"kernel")->fs->root->dentry
^
Thu Oct 28 08:16:42 2021 , Average: 0Kb/sec, Read: 0Kb, Write: 0Kb
UID PID PPID CMD DEVICE T BYTES
0 965 1 rs:main Q:Reg vda1 W 374
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-28 20:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-28 8:31 [Bug runtime/28511] New: Should --example imply -w ? mcermak at redhat dot com
2021-10-28 20:05 ` [Bug runtime/28511] " fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).