So let's get right to the point

["Brandon J. Van Every" <vanevery@indiegamedesign.com>]

Eric McDonald wrote:
> Brandon Van Every wrote:
>
> > Sometimes I think you are used to working with a very
> > low class of people in hack3rz forums,
>
> Nope. You're about the lowest I've gone.

I see, Eric.  I'm not going to retract my apology to you, I've
apologized for what I should have.  But it's clear that you have never
been interested in moving on.  You basically don't accept the
differences of style between us.  That might change years from now, but
it won't change in any timeframe that matters to present ventures.

So let's get right to the point.  How many things that I propose, are
you going to obstruct out of your need for personal animosity?  I think
it's best that you make the list now.  That way, we don't have to waste
time with people talking about it, me implementing it, and you blocking
it.  State your turf, the things you certainly aren't going to give
ground on.

We'll make this partly a multiple choice test.

1. Python required in the kernel
a) yeah, that's awesome!
b) hell no.  Go away.

2. Kicking 7.5 out the door so that new features can be added
a) yeah, any week now!
b) I want my months before you even think about touching my source pool.

3. Recruiting a horde of Windows C# .NET developers
a) the more the merrier!
b) get out of here you Micro$quish suckup bastard

And, these are questions I expect firm answers to.  The number of (a)
answers determines whether Xconq is a good use of my time.


Cheers,                     www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every           Seattle, WA

Taking risk where others will not.