From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: IMFApp Office
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408111243080.23625-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l03130301bd3fa7b3adf2@[212.181.162.155]>
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Hans Ronne wrote:
> I noticed this. I would say that what really happens is that those units
> (not all of them) that have an 8x8 image for some reason is using it at
> 16x16 magnification, too, instead of scaling down the 32x32 image.
Really? At least in my closeups, it appeared that the top left
corner of the 44x44 was appearing unscaled, and with the
transparency colors unsuppressed) in the "16x16" (22x24?) view
box.
>I don't
> think IMFApp is to blame for this, but rather the general image scaling
> code (best_image) which is used by both Xconq and IMFApp. It is unusal to
> provide 32x32 and 8x8 images, but not 16x16, so the code may get confused.
Then this is even more bothersome to me, because I would like to
provide an actual family of images which have distinct images (but
same name) for each view size, and if the code that handles this
is used in Xconq, then things could get ugly.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-11 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-04 1:31 Improved IMFApp Hans Ronne
2004-08-04 1:59 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-04 17:57 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-04 18:46 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-05 2:27 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-05 3:18 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-05 16:17 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-05 17:12 ` IMFApp Office (was Re: Improved IMFApp) Eric McDonald
2004-08-06 17:52 ` IMFApp Office Hans Ronne
2004-08-08 0:34 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-08 1:02 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-08 1:34 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-08 22:52 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-10 10:22 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-10 13:25 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-10 15:21 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-10 19:02 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-10 19:50 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-10 20:44 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-11 2:28 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-11 2:30 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-11 8:52 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-11 15:55 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-11 17:00 ` Eric McDonald [this message]
2004-08-12 1:56 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-04 9:50 ` Improved IMFApp Eric McDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0408111243080.23625-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu \
--to=mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu \
--cc=hronne@comhem.se \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).