* Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge
@ 2010-11-01 17:36 Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-01 21:00 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-11-01 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: archer
Hi,
FYI some brief stats on the Fedora trunk merge status. One should rebase it to
7.2.50.* first for F15=7.3 to rebase the patches to HEAD before trying to push
them to avoid rebasing them possibly twice.
fedpkg clone -b f14 -a gdb; cd gdb # fedpkg sources
grep '^#=.' gdb.spec |sed 's/:.*//'|sort|uniq -c|sort -nr
40 #=push
35 #=fedoratest
24 #=drop
15 #=push+work
14 #=maybepush
7 #=ia64
4 #=fedoratest+ppc
2 #=maybepush+work
2 #=maybepush+ppc
2 #=fedoratest+work
1 #=fedora
1 #=drop+work
more general summary:
grep '^#=.' gdb.spec |sed 's/:.*//'|sed 's/+.*//'|sort|uniq -c|sort -nr
55 #=push
41 #=fedoratest
25 #=drop
18 #=maybepush
7 #=ia64
1 #=fedora
cat $(egrep -A1 '^#=(maybe)?push' gdb.spec|sed -n 's/^Patch.*: //p')|wc
11018 49121 379064
cat $(egrep -A1 '^#=(maybe)?push' gdb.spec|sed -n 's/^Patch.*: //p')|grep ^+|wc
6288 29704 209858
#push=Should be pushed upstream.
#maybepush=Should be pushed upstream unless it got obsoleted there.
#fedora=Should stay as a Fedora patch.
#ia64=Drop after RHEL-5 rebases and rebuilds are no longer meaningful.
#fedoratest=Keep it in Fedora only as a regression test safety.
#+ppc=Specific for ppc32/ppc64/ppc*
#+work=Requires some nontrivial work.
drop vs. push vs. maybepush and whether +work are only a rough guess of mine.
Regards,
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge
2010-11-01 17:36 Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge Jan Kratochvil
@ 2010-11-01 21:00 ` Tom Tromey
2010-11-01 21:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-11-01 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: archer
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Jan> FYI some brief stats on the Fedora trunk merge status. One should
Jan> rebase it to 7.2.50.* first for F15=7.3 to rebase the patches to
Jan> HEAD before trying to push them to avoid rebasing them possibly
Jan> twice.
Thanks.
Jan> drop vs. push vs. maybepush and whether +work are only a rough
Jan> guess of mine.
For this specific one:
#=maybepush: May get obsoleted by Tom's unrelocated objfiles patch.
Patch389: gdb-archer-pie-addons.patch
Let's not wait for the split objfile branch.
It is on hold for a while, while I think about how to proceed.
Also, I think we should pick a day or two in November to have a Fedora
patch submit-a-thon. How about, say, Nov 18 and 19?
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge
2010-11-01 21:00 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2010-11-01 21:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-18 4:42 ` Fedora 15 patchset rebased to FSF GDB HEAD [Re: Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge] Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-11-01 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: archer
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:04:22 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Also, I think we should pick a day or two in November to have a Fedora
> patch submit-a-thon. How about, say, Nov 18 and 19?
OK, I will try to rebase it till that time, stats will change a bit.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Fedora 15 patchset rebased to FSF GDB HEAD [Re: Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge]
2010-11-01 21:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
@ 2010-11-18 4:42 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-18 15:58 ` Phil Muldoon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2010-11-18 4:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: archer
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:14:41 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:04:22 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > Also, I think we should pick a day or two in November to have a Fedora
> > patch submit-a-thon. How about, say, Nov 18 and 19?
>
> OK, I will try to rebase it till that time, stats will change a bit.
Fedora 15 has been rebased now on top of gdb-7.2.50.20101117.tar.bz2 .
Most of the "drop" patches have been really dropped; but not much more for the
stats.
!!! CHANGED:
fedpkg clone -b master -a gdb; cd gdb # fedpkg sources
grep '^#=.' gdb.spec |sed 's/:.*//'|sort|uniq -c|sort -nr
39 #=push
35 #=fedoratest
15 #=push+work
8 #=maybepush
7 #=ia64
6 #=drop
4 #=fedoratest+ppc
2 #=maybepush+work
2 #=maybepush+ppc
2 #=fedoratest+work
1 #=fedora
1 #=drop+work
grep '^#=.' gdb.spec |sed 's/:.*//'|sed 's/+.*//'|sort|uniq -c|sort -nr
54 #=push
41 #=fedoratest
12 #=maybepush
7 #=ia64
7 #=drop
1 #=fedora
#push=Should be pushed upstream.
#maybepush=Should be pushed upstream unless it got obsoleted there.
#fedora=Should stay as a Fedora patch.
#ia64=Drop after RHEL-5 rebases and rebuilds are no longer meaningful.
#fedoratest=Keep it in Fedora only as a regression test safety.
#+ppc=Specific for ppc32/ppc64/ppc*
#+work=Requires some nontrivial work.
Therefore only `push' and `maybepush' are interesting now.
Some of them were for example posted before, one should search archives first.
Thanks,
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Fedora 15 patchset rebased to FSF GDB HEAD [Re: Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge]
2010-11-18 4:42 ` Fedora 15 patchset rebased to FSF GDB HEAD [Re: Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge] Jan Kratochvil
@ 2010-11-18 15:58 ` Phil Muldoon
2010-11-19 21:05 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Phil Muldoon @ 2010-11-18 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: archer
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:14:41 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:04:22 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> > Also, I think we should pick a day or two in November to have a Fedora
>> > patch submit-a-thon. How about, say, Nov 18 and 19?
>>
>> OK, I will try to rebase it till that time, stats will change a bit.
>
> Fedora 15 has been rebased now on top of gdb-7.2.50.20101117.tar.bz2 .
> Most of the "drop" patches have been really dropped; but not much more for the
> stats.
>
> !!! CHANGED:
> fedpkg clone -b master -a gdb; cd gdb # fedpkg sources
Just so we don't work on the same patches the first two I will take are:
gdb-false-gcc-warning
(This will need expanding to other variables that causes errors with
-fprofile-use
and
gdb-6.7-testsuite-stable-results.patch
I'll check in for more when these are submitted.
Cheers,
Phil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fedora 15 patchset rebased to FSF GDB HEAD [Re: Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge]
2010-11-18 15:58 ` Phil Muldoon
@ 2010-11-19 21:05 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2010-11-19 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pmuldoon; +Cc: Jan Kratochvil, archer
Phil> Just so we don't work on the same patches the first two I will take are:
[...]
I handled:
# Security patch: avoid stack overflows in dwarf expression computation.
# CVE-2006-4146
#=push
Patch190: gdb-6.5-dwarf-stack-overflow.patch
# Fix debugging GDB itself - the compiled in source files paths (BZ 225783).
#=push
Patch241: gdb-6.6-bz225783-gdb-debuginfo-paths.patch
# Link with libreadline provided by the operating system.
#=push
Patch261: gdb-6.6-readline-system.patch
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-19 21:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-01 17:36 Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-01 21:00 ` Tom Tromey
2010-11-01 21:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-18 4:42 ` Fedora 15 patchset rebased to FSF GDB HEAD [Re: Brief stats for Fedora *.patch merge] Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-18 15:58 ` Phil Muldoon
2010-11-19 21:05 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).