Re: Should sh-*-* enable 64bit targets?

["H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>]

On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 12:47:57PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 07:33:03PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:48:25AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 05:58:22PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > >    sh-*-linux*)
> > > >      targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_shblin_vec
> > > >      targ_selvecs=bfd_elf32_shlin_vec
> > > > -#ifdef BFD64
> > > > -    targ_selvecs="${targ_selvecs} bfd_elf32_sh64lin_vec bfd_elf32_sh64blin_vec bfd_elf64_sh64lin_vec bfd_elf64_sh64blin_vec"
> > > > -#endif
> > > > +    targ64_selvecs="bfd_elf32_sh64lin_vec bfd_elf32_sh64blin_vec bfd_elf64_sh64lin_vec bfd_elf64_sh64blin_vec"
> > > >      ;;
> > > 
> > > You should have set want64=true here and in the other sh cases you
> > > changed to use targ64_selvecs.
> > 
> > I am not sure what the original intention was. I assume they wanted
> > to enable 64bit targets if BFD was 64bit. That is what my change does
> > by setting targ64_selvecs.
> 
> #ifdef in a shell script is just a comment.  So the original config.bfd
> always included the 64-bit sh targets in target_selvecs.  Your patch
> to use targ64_selvecs changes that behaviour.  Please add want64=true.

I built the sh-linux cross binutils without my patch:

[hjl@gnu-13 binutils-import-cross]$ ./build-sh-linux/ld/ld-new -V
GNU ld version 2.17.50 20060524
  Supported emulations:
   shlelf_linux
   shelf_linux
 
My patch doesn't change it. The question is what the original
intention was.

I don't think "#ifdef BFD64" is just a comment. targmatch.sed will put
them into targmatch.h:

#ifdef BFD64
...
#endif


H.J.