* [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts
@ 2006-06-09 16:58 Julian Brown
2006-06-13 16:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Julian Brown @ 2006-06-09 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: GCC Patches, DJ Delorie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 790 bytes --]
Hi,
This patch fixes a problem with floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit (on at
least x86_64), when cross-assembling to arm-none-eabi. The line which reads:
result = *(data + cur_byte) >> (-cur_bitshift);
was executed with cur_byte = -1 (start + len == 0 and order ==
floatformat_little), which happily segfaulted (during printing of FP
immediates).
I had a little trouble following the logic of the function, so this is
basically a rewrite. I hope that's OK.
Tested with cross (binutils) to arm-none-eabi from
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (i.e. big-endian) and
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (i.e. little-endian). OK to apply?
Cheers,
Julian
ChangeLog:
* floatformat.c (get_field): Fix segfault with little-endian word
order on 64-bit hosts.
(min): Move definition.
[-- Attachment #2: libiberty-getfield-2 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3746 bytes --]
Index: libiberty/floatformat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/libiberty/floatformat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.19.6.1
diff -c -p -r1.19.6.1 floatformat.c
*** libiberty/floatformat.c 24 Apr 2006 21:37:24 -0000 1.19.6.1
--- libiberty/floatformat.c 24 May 2006 12:51:20 -0000
*************** const struct floatformat floatformat_ia6
*** 249,301 ****
floatformat_always_valid
};
\f
/* Extract a field which starts at START and is LEN bits long. DATA and
TOTAL_LEN are the thing we are extracting it from, in byteorder ORDER. */
static unsigned long
get_field (const unsigned char *data, enum floatformat_byteorders order,
unsigned int total_len, unsigned int start, unsigned int len)
{
! unsigned long result;
unsigned int cur_byte;
! int cur_bitshift;
/* Start at the least significant part of the field. */
- cur_byte = (start + len) / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
if (order == floatformat_little)
! cur_byte = (total_len / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT) - cur_byte - 1;
! cur_bitshift =
! ((start + len) % FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT) - FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! result = *(data + cur_byte) >> (-cur_bitshift);
! cur_bitshift += FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! if (order == floatformat_little)
! ++cur_byte;
else
! --cur_byte;
! /* Move towards the most significant part of the field. */
! while ((unsigned int) cur_bitshift < len)
{
! if (len - cur_bitshift < FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT)
! /* This is the last byte; zero out the bits which are not part of
! this field. */
! result |=
! (*(data + cur_byte) & ((1 << (len - cur_bitshift)) - 1))
! << cur_bitshift;
! else
! result |= *(data + cur_byte) << cur_bitshift;
! cur_bitshift += FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! if (order == floatformat_little)
! ++cur_byte;
! else
! --cur_byte;
}
! return result;
}
- #ifndef min
- #define min(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
- #endif
-
/* Convert from FMT to a double.
FROM is the address of the extended float.
Store the double in *TO. */
--- 249,299 ----
floatformat_always_valid
};
\f
+
+ #ifndef min
+ #define min(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
+ #endif
+
/* Extract a field which starts at START and is LEN bits long. DATA and
TOTAL_LEN are the thing we are extracting it from, in byteorder ORDER. */
static unsigned long
get_field (const unsigned char *data, enum floatformat_byteorders order,
unsigned int total_len, unsigned int start, unsigned int len)
{
! unsigned long result = 0;
unsigned int cur_byte;
! int lo_bit, hi_bit, cur_bitshift = 0;
! int nextbyte = (order == floatformat_little) ? 1 : -1;
!
! /* Start is in big-endian bit order! Fix that first. */
! start = total_len - (start + len);
/* Start at the least significant part of the field. */
if (order == floatformat_little)
! cur_byte = start / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
else
! cur_byte = (total_len - start - 1) / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! lo_bit = start % FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! hi_bit = min (lo_bit + len, FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT);
!
! do
{
! unsigned int shifted = *(data + cur_byte) >> lo_bit;
! unsigned int bits = hi_bit - lo_bit;
! unsigned int mask = (1 << bits) - 1;
! result |= (shifted & mask) << cur_bitshift;
! len -= bits;
! cur_bitshift += bits;
! cur_byte += nextbyte;
! lo_bit = 0;
! hi_bit = min (len, FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT);
}
! while (len != 0);
!
! return result & ((2 << (total_len - 1)) - 1);
}
/* Convert from FMT to a double.
FROM is the address of the extended float.
Store the double in *TO. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts
2006-06-09 16:58 [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts Julian Brown
@ 2006-06-13 16:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-06-13 17:23 ` Julian Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2006-06-13 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Brown; +Cc: binutils, GCC Patches, DJ Delorie
Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com> writes:
> This patch fixes a problem with floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit (on
> at least x86_64), when cross-assembling to arm-none-eabi. The line
> which reads:
>
> result = *(data + cur_byte) >> (-cur_bitshift);
>
> was executed with cur_byte = -1 (start + len == 0 and order ==
> floatformat_little), which happily segfaulted (during printing of FP
> immediates).
I don't understand how start + len == 0 could ever be true. What was
calling the function? I note that put_field has the exact same
problem if start + len == 0.
> ! return result & ((2 << (total_len - 1)) - 1);
Why do you need to do this? And if you do need to do it, why use 2?
Why not ((1 << total_len) - 1)?
Please compile the file as a standalone program with -DIEEE_DEBUG to
make sure those tests still work. Ideally on both a big- and
little-endian system, if possible.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts
2006-06-13 16:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
@ 2006-06-13 17:23 ` Julian Brown
2006-06-14 2:44 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Julian Brown @ 2006-06-13 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Lance Taylor; +Cc: binutils, GCC Patches, DJ Delorie
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>
>>This patch fixes a problem with floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit (on
>>at least x86_64), when cross-assembling to arm-none-eabi. The line
>>which reads:
>>
>> result = *(data + cur_byte) >> (-cur_bitshift);
>>
>>was executed with cur_byte = -1 (start + len == 0 and order ==
>>floatformat_little), which happily segfaulted (during printing of FP
>>immediates).
>
>
> I don't understand how start + len == 0 could ever be true. What was
> calling the function? I note that put_field has the exact same
> problem if start + len == 0.
Sorry, I botched my explanation a bit. I should have said:
(start + len) / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT == 0
which is true when e.g. extracting the sign bit of a single-precision
IEEE float -- in that case, start will be 0 and len will be 1 (with
big-endian bit numbering used elsewhere in floatformat.c). The function
is called by opcodes/arm-dis.c to print out the ARM Neon
"quarter-precision" floating-point immediates.
>>! return result & ((2 << (total_len - 1)) - 1);
>
>
> Why do you need to do this? And if you do need to do it, why use 2?
> Why not ((1 << total_len) - 1)?
It was to attempt to maintain the original semantics of the function, as
I understood them: the result is truncated to total_len after being
built up <=8 bits at a time (though looking again, that might not have
been the original intention at all, or at least not at that level of
granularity... I suspect that bit should be removed).
The reason for using 2 << ... rather than 1 << .. was so that, e.g., the
total_len == 32 case works properly. AIUI, shift amounts must be
strictly less than the width of the operand, and the total_len==0 case
isn't interesting. But that's irrelevant if I'm getting rid of that bit
anyway :-)
So, I'll remove that bit and do the following...
> Please compile the file as a standalone program with -DIEEE_DEBUG to
> make sure those tests still work. Ideally on both a big- and
> little-endian system, if possible.
Thanks,
Julian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts
2006-06-13 17:23 ` Julian Brown
@ 2006-06-14 2:44 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-06-15 22:46 ` Julian Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2006-06-14 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Brown; +Cc: binutils, GCC Patches, DJ Delorie
Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com> writes:
> So, I'll remove that bit and do the following...
>
> > Please compile the file as a standalone program with -DIEEE_DEBUG to
> > make sure those tests still work. Ideally on both a big- and
> > little-endian system, if possible.
This patch is OK with that change, assuming the tests pass.
Bonus points if you rewrite put_field.
Thanks.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts
2006-06-14 2:44 ` Ian Lance Taylor
@ 2006-06-15 22:46 ` Julian Brown
2006-07-21 5:36 ` Mark Mitchell
2006-07-21 16:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Julian Brown @ 2006-06-15 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Lance Taylor; +Cc: binutils, GCC Patches, DJ Delorie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 908 bytes --]
Hi,
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>>Please compile the file as a standalone program with -DIEEE_DEBUG to
>>>make sure those tests still work. Ideally on both a big- and
>>>little-endian system, if possible.
I've done this (with a new put_field too), though the IEEE_DEBUG test
needs explicitly changing to use floatformat_ieee_double_big not
floatformat_ieee_double_little on a big-endian host, which wasn't
immediately obvious...
> This patch is OK with that change, assuming the tests pass.
>
> Bonus points if you rewrite put_field.
"put_field" indeed crashed too on x86_64 with IEEE_DEBUG defined, so
I've rewritten it in a similar style. Just to be sure, is this still OK
(for gcc and/or binutils)?
Cheers,
Julian
ChangeLog (libiberty):
* floatformat.c (get_field): Fix segfault with little-endian word
order on 64-bit hosts.
(put_field): Likewise.
(min): Move definition.
[-- Attachment #2: libiberty-getfield-5 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6266 bytes --]
Index: floatformat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/libiberty/floatformat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -c -p -r1.20 floatformat.c
*** floatformat.c 24 Apr 2006 21:34:41 -0000 1.20
--- floatformat.c 15 Jun 2006 22:02:54 -0000
*************** const struct floatformat floatformat_ia6
*** 249,301 ****
floatformat_always_valid
};
\f
/* Extract a field which starts at START and is LEN bits long. DATA and
TOTAL_LEN are the thing we are extracting it from, in byteorder ORDER. */
static unsigned long
get_field (const unsigned char *data, enum floatformat_byteorders order,
unsigned int total_len, unsigned int start, unsigned int len)
{
! unsigned long result;
unsigned int cur_byte;
! int cur_bitshift;
/* Start at the least significant part of the field. */
- cur_byte = (start + len) / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
if (order == floatformat_little)
! cur_byte = (total_len / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT) - cur_byte - 1;
! cur_bitshift =
! ((start + len) % FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT) - FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! result = *(data + cur_byte) >> (-cur_bitshift);
! cur_bitshift += FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! if (order == floatformat_little)
! ++cur_byte;
else
! --cur_byte;
! /* Move towards the most significant part of the field. */
! while ((unsigned int) cur_bitshift < len)
{
! if (len - cur_bitshift < FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT)
! /* This is the last byte; zero out the bits which are not part of
! this field. */
! result |=
! (*(data + cur_byte) & ((1 << (len - cur_bitshift)) - 1))
! << cur_bitshift;
! else
! result |= *(data + cur_byte) << cur_bitshift;
! cur_bitshift += FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! if (order == floatformat_little)
! ++cur_byte;
! else
! --cur_byte;
}
return result;
}
- #ifndef min
- #define min(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
- #endif
-
/* Convert from FMT to a double.
FROM is the address of the extended float.
Store the double in *TO. */
--- 249,299 ----
floatformat_always_valid
};
\f
+
+ #ifndef min
+ #define min(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
+ #endif
+
/* Extract a field which starts at START and is LEN bits long. DATA and
TOTAL_LEN are the thing we are extracting it from, in byteorder ORDER. */
static unsigned long
get_field (const unsigned char *data, enum floatformat_byteorders order,
unsigned int total_len, unsigned int start, unsigned int len)
{
! unsigned long result = 0;
unsigned int cur_byte;
! int lo_bit, hi_bit, cur_bitshift = 0;
! int nextbyte = (order == floatformat_little) ? 1 : -1;
!
! /* Start is in big-endian bit order! Fix that first. */
! start = total_len - (start + len);
/* Start at the least significant part of the field. */
if (order == floatformat_little)
! cur_byte = start / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
else
! cur_byte = (total_len - start - 1) / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! lo_bit = start % FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! hi_bit = min (lo_bit + len, FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT);
!
! do
{
! unsigned int shifted = *(data + cur_byte) >> lo_bit;
! unsigned int bits = hi_bit - lo_bit;
! unsigned int mask = (1 << bits) - 1;
! result |= (shifted & mask) << cur_bitshift;
! len -= bits;
! cur_bitshift += bits;
! cur_byte += nextbyte;
! lo_bit = 0;
! hi_bit = min (len, FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT);
}
+ while (len != 0);
+
return result;
}
/* Convert from FMT to a double.
FROM is the address of the extended float.
Store the double in *TO. */
*************** put_field (unsigned char *data, enum flo
*** 428,470 ****
unsigned long stuff_to_put)
{
unsigned int cur_byte;
! int cur_bitshift;
/* Start at the least significant part of the field. */
- cur_byte = (start + len) / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
- if (order == floatformat_little)
- cur_byte = (total_len / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT) - cur_byte - 1;
- cur_bitshift =
- ((start + len) % FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT) - FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
- *(data + cur_byte) &=
- ~(((1 << ((start + len) % FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT)) - 1) << (-cur_bitshift));
- *(data + cur_byte) |=
- (stuff_to_put & ((1 << FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT) - 1)) << (-cur_bitshift);
- cur_bitshift += FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
if (order == floatformat_little)
! ++cur_byte;
else
! --cur_byte;
! /* Move towards the most significant part of the field. */
! while ((unsigned int) cur_bitshift < len)
{
! if (len - cur_bitshift < FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT)
! {
! /* This is the last byte. */
! *(data + cur_byte) &=
! ~((1 << (len - cur_bitshift)) - 1);
! *(data + cur_byte) |= (stuff_to_put >> cur_bitshift);
! }
! else
! *(data + cur_byte) = ((stuff_to_put >> cur_bitshift)
! & ((1 << FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT) - 1));
! cur_bitshift += FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! if (order == floatformat_little)
! ++cur_byte;
! else
! --cur_byte;
}
}
/* The converse: convert the double *FROM to an extended float
--- 426,459 ----
unsigned long stuff_to_put)
{
unsigned int cur_byte;
! int lo_bit, hi_bit;
! int nextbyte = (order == floatformat_little) ? 1 : -1;
!
! /* Start is in big-endian bit order! Fix that first. */
! start = total_len - (start + len);
/* Start at the least significant part of the field. */
if (order == floatformat_little)
! cur_byte = start / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
else
! cur_byte = (total_len - start - 1) / FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! lo_bit = start % FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT;
! hi_bit = min (lo_bit + len, FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT);
!
! do
{
! unsigned char *byte_ptr = data + cur_byte;
! unsigned int bits = hi_bit - lo_bit;
! unsigned int mask = ((1 << bits) - 1) << lo_bit;
! *byte_ptr = (*byte_ptr & ~mask) | ((stuff_to_put << lo_bit) & mask);
! stuff_to_put >>= bits;
! len -= bits;
! cur_byte += nextbyte;
! lo_bit = 0;
! hi_bit = min (len, FLOATFORMAT_CHAR_BIT);
}
+ while (len != 0);
}
/* The converse: convert the double *FROM to an extended float
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts
2006-06-15 22:46 ` Julian Brown
@ 2006-07-21 5:36 ` Mark Mitchell
2006-07-21 16:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2006-07-21 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Brown; +Cc: Ian Lance Taylor, binutils, GCC Patches, DJ Delorie
Julian Brown wrote:
> "put_field" indeed crashed too on x86_64 with IEEE_DEBUG defined, so
> I've rewritten it in a similar style. Just to be sure, is this still OK
> (for gcc and/or binutils)?
Julian, did you ever get a reply to this? (It doesn't look to me as
though the patch has gone in, though perhaps I'm just not seeing it.)
Ian, might you be able to take a look at this last version, if you've
not already?
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts
2006-06-15 22:46 ` Julian Brown
2006-07-21 5:36 ` Mark Mitchell
@ 2006-07-21 16:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-11-07 15:21 ` Julian Brown
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2006-07-21 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Brown; +Cc: binutils, GCC Patches, DJ Delorie
Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com> writes:
> ChangeLog (libiberty):
>
> * floatformat.c (get_field): Fix segfault with little-endian word
> order on 64-bit hosts.
> (put_field): Likewise.
> (min): Move definition.
This is OK.
Sorry, it fell far enough back in my mail queue that I was no longer
seeing it.
Thanks.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts
2006-07-21 16:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
@ 2006-11-07 15:21 ` Julian Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Julian Brown @ 2006-11-07 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Lance Taylor; +Cc: binutils, GCC Patches, DJ Delorie
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> ChangeLog (libiberty):
>>
>> * floatformat.c (get_field): Fix segfault with little-endian word
>> order on 64-bit hosts.
>> (put_field): Likewise.
>> (min): Move definition.
>
> This is OK.
>
> Sorry, it fell far enough back in my mail queue that I was no longer
> seeing it.
This patch is now committed in both GCC's and binutils' copies of
libiberty. Sorry I've been so slow at getting around to committing it!
(This fixes some long-standing test failures on HEAD).
Cheers,
Julian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-07 15:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-09 16:58 [PATCH, libiberty] Fix segfault in floatformat.c:get_field on 64-bit hosts Julian Brown
2006-06-13 16:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-06-13 17:23 ` Julian Brown
2006-06-14 2:44 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-06-15 22:46 ` Julian Brown
2006-07-21 5:36 ` Mark Mitchell
2006-07-21 16:33 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2006-11-07 15:21 ` Julian Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).