public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] elf: Set p_align to the minimum page size if possible
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:41:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOovU802+bqsZ25nzb91MNQ8ruiwu1gm_Hxu38xGZBdt2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YcuvEOIB5TfXSlLA@squeak.grove.modra.org>

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 4:43 PM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 07:54:18PM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> > Changes in v3:
> >
> > 1. To enable this linker optimization, the backend must define ELF_P_ALIGN
> > to ELF_MINPAGESIZE.
>
> All this means is that you're only breaking x86 binaries for those
> with older glibc who might be running with page size larger than 4k.

Correct.

> If this isn't so, what am I missing?
>
> Also, please check for fallout in future.
>
> alpha-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> alpha-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> alpha-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> alpha-netbsd  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> alpha-unknown-freebsd4.7  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> arc-elf  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> arc-linux-uclibc  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> arc-linux-uclibc  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> arc-linux-uclibc  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> arm-nacl  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> avr-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> cr16-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> cris-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> cris-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> cris-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> crisv32-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> crisv32-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> crisv32-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> crx-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> frv-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> frv-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> frv-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> h8300-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> h8300-linux  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> ia64-elf  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> ia64-freebsd5  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> ia64-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> ia64-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> ia64-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> ia64-netbsd  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> ip2k-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> lm32-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> lm32-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> lm32-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> loongarch64-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> loongarch64-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> m32c-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> m32r-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> m68k-elf  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> m68k-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> m68k-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> m68k-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> moxie-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> nds32le-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> nds32le-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> nds32le-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> or1k-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> or1k-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> or1k-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> pru-elf  +FAIL: pru_irq_map special section for host
> pru-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> score-elf  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> shle-unknown-netbsdelf  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> sh-nto  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> sh-rtems  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> sparc64-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> sparc64-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> sparc64-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> sparc-elf  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> sparc-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> sparc-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> sparc-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> sparc-sun-solaris2  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> spu-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> tilegx-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> tilegx-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> tilegx-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> tilepro-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/pr26936
> tilepro-linux  +FAIL: ld-elf/seg
> tilepro-linux  +FAIL: rgn-at5
> visium-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571
> xstormy16-elf  +FAIL: ld-scripts/pr23571

I adjusted these tests in the v3 patch:

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-December/119047.html

-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-29 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-25  3:54 H.J. Lu
2021-12-29  0:42 ` Alan Modra
2021-12-29 19:41   ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2021-12-29 19:39 H.J. Lu
2022-01-14  8:12 ` Jan Beulich
2022-02-10 12:44   ` Jan Beulich
2022-01-14  8:27 ` Jan Beulich
2022-01-14 13:03   ` H.J. Lu
2022-01-14 13:40     ` Jan Beulich
2022-01-14 14:02       ` H.J. Lu
2022-01-14 14:07         ` Jan Beulich
2022-01-14 14:14           ` H.J. Lu
2022-01-17 10:38             ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMe9rOovU802+bqsZ25nzb91MNQ8ruiwu1gm_Hxu38xGZBdt2w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=amodra@gmail.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).