public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ld: Turn on --error-execstack/--error-rwx-segments
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 05:03:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpvL78TewSOuPbRNJJ7_pJdvOUnr08Gc6EZw2acp6Ts5g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29c60b5a-8594-4c4d-b97d-f1d96761a27e@suse.com>

On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 11:30 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 26.01.2024 22:45, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > --- a/ld/lexsup.c
> > +++ b/ld/lexsup.c
> > @@ -1947,6 +1947,17 @@ parse_args (unsigned argc, char **argv)
> >        && command_line.check_section_addresses < 0)
> >      command_line.check_section_addresses = 0;
> >
> > +  /* Override --no-error-execstack and --no-warn-execstack and turn on
> > +     --error-execstack for --warn-execstack and --error-rwx-segments for
> > +     --warn-rwx-segments if --fatal-warnings is used.  */
> > +  if (config.fatal_warnings)
> > +    {
> > +      if (link_info.warn_execstack)
> > +     link_info.error_execstack = 1;
> > +      if (!link_info.no_warn_rwx_segments)
> > +     link_info.warn_is_error_for_rwx_segments = 1;
> > +    }
> > +
> >    if (export_list)
> >      {
> >        struct bfd_elf_version_expr *head = export_list->head.list;
>
> If I'm not mistaken and if the comment is properly describing things,
> this placement of the addition means --no-* last on the command line
> wouldn't be honored anymore, when later arguments ought to override
> earlier ones.
>

Before my change, we got

[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$ touch x.s
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$ gcc -c x.s
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$ ld -shared -z stack-size=0x123400 --fatal-warnings
--warn-execstack --no-error-execstack  x.o
ld: warning: x.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack
ld: NOTE: This behaviour is deprecated and will be removed in a future
version of the linker
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$ echo $?
1

The warning is misleading since --fatal-warnings IS position independent
and is always fatal for ANY warning.  My patch changes it to

[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$ ./ld-new -shared -z stack-size=0x123400
--fatal-warnings --warn-execstack --no-error-execstack  x.o
./ld-new: error: x.o: is triggering the generation of an executable
stack because it does not have a .note.GNU-stack section
./ld-new: failed to set dynamic section sizes: file format not recognized
[hjl@gnu-cfl-3 ld]$

Any other comments to my patch?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-29 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-26 21:45 H.J. Lu
2024-01-28 15:04 ` H.J. Lu
2024-01-29  7:33   ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-29 12:59     ` H.J. Lu
2024-01-29  7:30 ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-29 13:03   ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2024-01-29 14:03     ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-29 14:10       ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMe9rOpvL78TewSOuPbRNJJ7_pJdvOUnr08Gc6EZw2acp6Ts5g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).