public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nelson Chu <nelson@rivosinc.com>
To: Tatsuyuki Ishi <ishitatsuyuki@gmail.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, i@maskray.me, rui314@gmail.com,
	 ruiu@bluewhale.systems
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] RISC-V: Initial ld.bfd support for TLSDESC.
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:33:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPpQWtA+xvLAd383Nc5_XV_2Mq7vaRojPM9G0yMEhxTt9az3BA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231128085109.28422-6-ishitatsuyuki@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13863 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 4:51 PM Tatsuyuki Ishi <ishitatsuyuki@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Only relocation handling for now; relaxation is not implemented yet.
>
> bfd/
>     * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_check_relocs): Record GOT reference and
>     paired relocation for TLSDESC_HI20.
>     (riscv_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Allocate GOT and reloc slots for
>     TLSDESC symbols.
>     (riscv_elf_size_dynamic_sections): Likewise but for local symbols.
>     (tlsdescoff): New helper to determine static addend for R_TLSDESC.
>     (riscv_elf_relocate_section): Ignore TLSDESC_CALL reloc for now (it is
>     relaxation only).
>     Handle TLSDESC_{LOAD,ADD}_LO12 as paired pcrel relocs.
>     For TLS GOT slot generation, generalize the logic to handle any
>     combination of (GD, IE, TLSDESC).
>     Add TLSDESC Rela generation.
>     * ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls*: Add TLSDESC instruction sequences
>     next to the existing GD and IE sequences. Update expectations.
> ---
>  bfd/elfnn-riscv.c                  | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.d    |  4 +-
>  ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.s    | 14 +++++
>  ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tlsbin.d |  5 ++
>  4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
> index d5190538503..8f63998aa5a 100644
> --- a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
> +++ b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ struct riscv_elf_link_hash_entry
>  #define GOT_TLS_GD     2
>  #define GOT_TLS_IE     4
>  #define GOT_TLS_LE     8
> +#define GOT_TLSDESC    16
>    char tls_type;
>  };
>
> @@ -300,6 +301,7 @@ riscv_is_insn_reloc (const reloc_howto_type *howto)
>  #define GOT_ENTRY_SIZE RISCV_ELF_WORD_BYTES
>  #define TLS_GD_GOT_ENTRY_SIZE (RISCV_ELF_WORD_BYTES * 2)
>  #define TLS_IE_GOT_ENTRY_SIZE RISCV_ELF_WORD_BYTES
> +#define TLSDESC_GOT_ENTRY_SIZE (RISCV_ELF_WORD_BYTES * 2)
>  /* Reserve two entries of GOTPLT for ld.so, one is used for PLT resolver,
>     the other is used for link map.  Other targets also reserve one more
>     entry used for runtime profile?  */
> @@ -855,6 +857,12 @@ riscv_elf_check_relocs (bfd *abfd, struct
> bfd_link_info *info,
>             return false;
>           break;
>
> +       case R_RISCV_TLSDESC_HI20:
> +         if (!riscv_elf_record_got_reference (abfd, info, h, r_symndx)
> +             || !riscv_elf_record_tls_type (abfd, h, r_symndx,
> GOT_TLSDESC))
> +           return false;
> +         break;
> +
>         case R_RISCV_CALL:
>         case R_RISCV_CALL_PLT:
>           /* These symbol requires a procedure linkage table entry.
> @@ -1313,7 +1321,7 @@ allocate_dynrelocs (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h,
> void *inf)
>        s = htab->elf.sgot;
>        h->got.offset = s->size;
>        dyn = htab->elf.dynamic_sections_created;
> -      if (tls_type & (GOT_TLS_GD | GOT_TLS_IE))
> +      if (tls_type & (GOT_TLS_GD | GOT_TLS_IE | GOT_TLSDESC))
>         {
>           int indx = 0;
>           bool need_reloc = false;
> @@ -1334,6 +1342,14 @@ allocate_dynrelocs (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h,
> void *inf)
>               if (need_reloc)
>                 htab->elf.srelgot->size += sizeof (ElfNN_External_Rela);
>             }
> +
> +         /* TLSDESC needs one dynamic reloc and two GOT slots.  */
> +         if (tls_type & GOT_TLSDESC)
> +           {
> +             s->size += TLSDESC_GOT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> +             /* TLSDESC always use dynamic relocs.  */
> +             htab->elf.srelgot->size += sizeof (ElfNN_External_Rela);
> +           }

        }
>        else
>         {
> @@ -1561,7 +1577,7 @@ riscv_elf_size_dynamic_sections (bfd *output_bfd,
> struct bfd_link_info *info)
>           if (*local_got > 0)
>             {
>               *local_got = s->size;
> -             if (*local_tls_type & (GOT_TLS_GD | GOT_TLS_IE))
> +             if (*local_tls_type & (GOT_TLS_GD | GOT_TLS_IE |
> GOT_TLSDESC))
>                 {
>                   if (*local_tls_type & GOT_TLS_GD)
>                     {
> @@ -1575,6 +1591,11 @@ riscv_elf_size_dynamic_sections (bfd *output_bfd,
> struct bfd_link_info *info)
>                       if (bfd_link_dll (info))
>                         srel->size += sizeof (ElfNN_External_Rela);
>                     }
> +                 if (*local_tls_type & GOT_TLSDESC)
> +                   {
> +                     s->size += TLSDESC_GOT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> +                     srel->size += sizeof (ElfNN_External_Rela);
> +                   }
>

The code base seems different from the upstream code.


>                 }
>               else
>                 {
> @@ -1725,6 +1746,17 @@ tpoff (struct bfd_link_info *info, bfd_vma address)
>    return address - elf_hash_table (info)->tls_sec->vma - TP_OFFSET;
>  }
>
> +/* Return the relocation value for a static TLSDESC relocation.  */
> +
> +static bfd_vma
> +tlsdescoff (struct bfd_link_info *info, bfd_vma address)
> +{
> +  /* If tls_sec is NULL, we should have signalled an error already.  */
> +  if (elf_hash_table (info)->tls_sec == NULL)
> +    return 0;
> +  return address - elf_hash_table (info)->tls_sec->vma;
> +}
> +
>  /* Return the global pointer's value, or 0 if it is not in use.  */
>
>  static bfd_vma
> @@ -1774,6 +1806,7 @@ perform_relocation (const reloc_howto_type *howto,
>      case R_RISCV_GOT_HI20:
>      case R_RISCV_TLS_GOT_HI20:
>      case R_RISCV_TLS_GD_HI20:
> +    case R_RISCV_TLSDESC_HI20:
>        if (ARCH_SIZE > 32 && !VALID_UTYPE_IMM (RISCV_CONST_HIGH_PART
> (value)))
>         return bfd_reloc_overflow;
>        value = ENCODE_UTYPE_IMM (RISCV_CONST_HIGH_PART (value));
> @@ -1784,6 +1817,8 @@ perform_relocation (const reloc_howto_type *howto,
>      case R_RISCV_TPREL_LO12_I:
>      case R_RISCV_TPREL_I:
>      case R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I:
> +    case R_RISCV_TLSDESC_LOAD_LO12:
> +    case R_RISCV_TLSDESC_ADD_LO12:
>        value = ENCODE_ITYPE_IMM (value);
>        break;
>
> @@ -2202,8 +2237,8 @@ riscv_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
>        bfd_vma relocation;
>        bfd_reloc_status_type r = bfd_reloc_ok;
>        const char *name = NULL;
> -      bfd_vma off, ie_off;
> -      bool unresolved_reloc, is_ie = false;
> +      bfd_vma off, ie_off, desc_off;
> +      bool unresolved_reloc, is_ie = false, is_desc = false;
>        bfd_vma pc = sec_addr (input_section) + rel->r_offset;
>        int r_type = ELFNN_R_TYPE (rel->r_info), tls_type;
>        reloc_howto_type *howto = riscv_elf_rtype_to_howto (input_bfd,
> r_type);
> @@ -2506,6 +2541,7 @@ riscv_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
>         case R_RISCV_NONE:
>         case R_RISCV_RELAX:
>         case R_RISCV_TPREL_ADD:
> +       case R_RISCV_TLSDESC_CALL:
>         case R_RISCV_COPY:
>         case R_RISCV_JUMP_SLOT:
>         case R_RISCV_RELATIVE:
> @@ -2827,6 +2863,15 @@ riscv_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
>           relocation = dtpoff (info, relocation);
>           break;
>
> +       case R_RISCV_TLSDESC_LOAD_LO12:
> +       case R_RISCV_TLSDESC_ADD_LO12:
> +         if (riscv_record_pcrel_lo_reloc (&pcrel_relocs, relocation, rel,
> +                                          input_section, info, howto,
> +                                          contents))
> +             continue;
> +         r = bfd_reloc_overflow;
> +         break;
> +
>

According to the spec, we probably can add a check here to make sure the
addend must be zero, otherwise report dangerous relocation, just similar to
what pcrel_lo did.


>         case R_RISCV_32:
>           /* Non ABS symbol should be blocked in check_relocs.  */
>           if (ARCH_SIZE > 32)
> @@ -2892,11 +2937,16 @@ riscv_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
>             }
>           break;
>
> +       case R_RISCV_TLSDESC_HI20:
> +         is_desc = true;
> +         goto tls;
> +
>         case R_RISCV_TLS_GOT_HI20:
>           is_ie = true;
> -         /* Fall through.  */
> +         goto tls;
>
>         case R_RISCV_TLS_GD_HI20:
> +       tls:
>           if (h != NULL)
>             {
>               off = h->got.offset;
> @@ -2909,12 +2959,16 @@ riscv_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
>             }
>
>           tls_type = _bfd_riscv_elf_tls_type (input_bfd, h, r_symndx);
> -         BFD_ASSERT (tls_type & (GOT_TLS_IE | GOT_TLS_GD));
> +         BFD_ASSERT (tls_type & (GOT_TLS_IE | GOT_TLS_GD | GOT_TLSDESC));
>           /* If this symbol is referenced by both GD and IE TLS, the IE
>              reference's GOT slot follows the GD reference's slots.  */
>           ie_off = 0;
>           if ((tls_type & GOT_TLS_GD) && (tls_type & GOT_TLS_IE))
> -           ie_off = TLS_GD_GOT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> +           ie_off += TLS_GD_GOT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> +
> +         desc_off = ie_off;
> +         if (tls_type & GOT_TLS_IE)
> +           desc_off += TLS_IE_GOT_ENTRY_SIZE;


Is it possible that we only link GD and DESC, but without IE?


>           if ((off & 1) != 0)
>             off &= ~1;
> @@ -2996,10 +3050,29 @@ riscv_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
>                                   htab->elf.sgot->contents + off + ie_off);
>                     }
>                 }
> +
> +             if (tls_type & GOT_TLSDESC)
> +               {
> +                 /* TLSDESC is always handled by the dynamic linker and
> always need
> +                  * a relocation.  */
> +                 bfd_put_NN (output_bfd, 0,
> +                             htab->elf.sgot->contents + off + desc_off);
> +                 outrel.r_offset = sec_addr (htab->elf.sgot)
> +                                   + off + desc_off;
> +                 outrel.r_addend = 0;
> +                 if (indx == 0)
> +                   outrel.r_addend = tlsdescoff (info, relocation);
> +                 outrel.r_info = ELFNN_R_INFO (indx, R_RISCV_TLSDESC);
> +                 riscv_elf_append_rela (output_bfd, htab->elf.srelgot,
> &outrel);
> +               }
>             }
>
>           BFD_ASSERT (off < (bfd_vma) -2);
> -         relocation = sec_addr (htab->elf.sgot) + off + (is_ie ? ie_off :
> 0);
> +         relocation = sec_addr (htab->elf.sgot) + off;
> +         if (is_ie)
> +           relocation += ie_off;
> +         else if (is_desc)
> +           relocation += desc_off;
>           if (!riscv_record_pcrel_hi_reloc (&pcrel_relocs, pc,
>                                             relocation, r_type,
>                                             false))
> @@ -3219,7 +3292,7 @@ riscv_elf_finish_dynamic_symbol (bfd *output_bfd,
>      }
>
>    if (h->got.offset != (bfd_vma) -1
> -      && !(riscv_elf_hash_entry (h)->tls_type & (GOT_TLS_GD | GOT_TLS_IE))
> +      && !(riscv_elf_hash_entry (h)->tls_type & (GOT_TLS_GD | GOT_TLS_IE
> | GOT_TLSDESC))
>        && !UNDEFWEAK_NO_DYNAMIC_RELOC (info, h))
>      {
>        asection *sgot;
> diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.d
> b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.d
> index e7f20309bf1..6cf008ac7a0 100644
> --- a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.d
> +++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.d
> @@ -2,13 +2,15 @@
>  #ld: --shared tmpdir/tlslib.so
>  #readelf: -Wr
>
> -Relocation section '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x[0-9a-f]+ contains 5 entries:
> +Relocation section '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x[0-9a-f]+ contains 7 entries:
>   +Offset +Info +Type +Symbol's Value +Symbol's Name \+ Addend
>  [0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_TLS_DTPMOD64 +0
>  [0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_TLS_TPREL64 +4
> +[0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_TLSDESC +4
>  [0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_TLS_DTPMOD64 +0+ sg1 \+ 0
>  [0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_TLS_DTPREL64 +0+ sg1 \+ 0
>  [0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_TLS_TPREL64 +0+ sg1 \+ 0
> +[0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_TLSDESC +0+ sg1 \+ 0
>
>  Relocation section '.rela.plt' at offset 0x[0-9a-f]+ contains 1 entry:
>   +Offset +Info +Type +Symbol's Value +Symbol's Name \+ Addend
> diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.s
> b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.s
> index 79e9bc20374..7cbf5ea6c72 100644
> --- a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.s
> +++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tls.s
> @@ -17,6 +17,13 @@ _start:
>         la.tls.ie       a0,sg1
>         add     a0,a0,tp
>
> +       /* GD (TLSDESC), global var */
> +.desc1:
> +       auipc   a0, %tlsdesc_hi(sg1)
> +       lw      t0, %tlsdesc_load_lo(.desc1)(a0)
> +       addi    a0, a0, %tlsdesc_add_lo(.desc1)
> +       jalr    t0, t0, %tlsdesc_call(.desc1)
> +
>         /* GD, local var */
>         la.tls.gd       a0,sl1
>         call  __tls_get_addr
> @@ -25,4 +32,11 @@ _start:
>         la.tls.ie       a0,sl1
>         add     a0,a0,tp
>
> +       /* GD (TLSDESC), local var */
> +.desc2:
> +       auipc   a0, %tlsdesc_hi(sl1)
> +       lw      t0, %tlsdesc_load_lo(.desc2)(a0)
> +       addi    a0, a0, %tlsdesc_add_lo(.desc2)
> +       jalr    t0, t0, %tlsdesc_call(.desc2)
> +
>         ret
> diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tlsbin.d
> b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tlsbin.d
> index cdcd51a9199..79b7ade405e 100644
> --- a/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tlsbin.d
> +++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/tlsbin.d
> @@ -2,6 +2,11 @@
>  #ld: -no-pie tmpdir/tlslib.so
>  #readelf: -Wr
>
> +Relocation section '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x[0-9a-f]+ contains 2 entries:
> + +Offset +Info +Type +Symbol's Value +Symbol's Name \+ Addend
> +[0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_TLSDESC +4
> +[0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_TLSDESC +0
> +
>  Relocation section '.rela.plt' at offset 0x[0-9a-f]+ contains 1 entry:
>   +Offset +Info +Type +Symbol's Value +Symbol's Name \+ Addend
>  [0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ R_RISCV_JUMP_SLOT +[0-9a-f]+ __tls_get_addr \+ 0
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-19  4:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-17 18:08 [PATCH 0/4] RISC-V: Implement TLS Descriptors Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-08-17 18:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] RISC-V: Add TLSDESC reloc definitions Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-08-17 18:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] RISC-V: Add assembly support for TLSDESC Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-08-17 18:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] RISC-V: Define and use GOT entry size constants for TLS Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-08-17 18:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] RISC-V: Initial ld.bfd support for TLSDESC Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-08-18  0:22 ` [PATCH 0/4] RISC-V: Implement TLS Descriptors Nelson Chu
2023-08-18  7:13   ` Fangrui Song
2023-08-31 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-08-31 17:13   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] RISC-V: Fix local GOT and reloc size calculation for TLS Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-21  0:49     ` Nelson Chu
2024-02-21  7:04       ` Nelson Chu
2023-08-31 17:13   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] RISC-V: Add TLSDESC reloc definitions Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-08-31 17:13   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] RISC-V: Add assembly support for TLSDESC Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-08-31 17:13   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] RISC-V: Define and use GOT entry size constants for TLS Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-08-31 17:13   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] RISC-V: Initial ld.bfd support for TLSDESC Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] RISC-V: Implement TLS Descriptors Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 1/9] RISC-V: Fix local GOT and reloc size calculation for TLS Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 2/9] RISC-V: Add TLSDESC reloc definitions Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-19  0:49     ` Nelson Chu
2024-02-20 17:28       ` Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 3/9] RISC-V: Add assembly support for TLSDESC Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-19  1:44     ` Nelson Chu
2024-02-20 17:29       ` Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 4/9] RISC-V: Define and use GOT entry size constants for TLS Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-19  1:57     ` Nelson Chu
2024-02-20 17:32       ` Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 5/9] RISC-V: Initial ld.bfd support for TLSDESC Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-19  4:33     ` Nelson Chu [this message]
2024-02-20 17:36       ` Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 6/9] RISC-V: Move STATIC_TLS handling into record_tls_type Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 7/9] RISC-V: Unify TLS handling in check_relocs Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 8/9] RISC-V: Add elf_link_hash_entry to relax_func args Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-11-28  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 9/9] RISC-V: Introduce TLSDESC relaxation Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-12-05 16:44   ` [PATCH v3 0/9] RISC-V: Implement TLS Descriptors Tatsuyuki Ishi
2023-12-06  0:33     ` Nelson Chu
2023-12-07  3:35       ` Fangrui Song
2023-12-13  0:27         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-12-13  1:53           ` Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-01-27  0:57             ` Fangrui Song
2024-02-20 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 " Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-20 17:55   ` [PATCH v4 1/9] RISC-V: Fix local GOT and reloc size calculation for TLS Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-20 17:55   ` [PATCH v4 2/9] RISC-V: Add TLSDESC reloc definitions Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-20 17:55   ` [PATCH v4 3/9] RISC-V: Add assembly support for TLSDESC Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-20 17:55   ` [PATCH v4 4/9] RISC-V: Define and use GOT entry size constants for TLS Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-20 17:55   ` [PATCH v4 5/9] RISC-V: Initial ld.bfd support for TLSDESC Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-20 17:55   ` [PATCH v4 6/9] RISC-V: Move STATIC_TLS handling into record_tls_type Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-20 17:55   ` [PATCH v4 7/9] RISC-V: Unify TLS handling in check_relocs Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-20 17:55   ` [PATCH v4 8/9] RISC-V: Add elf_link_hash_entry to relax_func args Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-20 17:55   ` [PATCH v4 9/9] RISC-V: Introduce TLSDESC relaxation Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-02-29  7:06   ` [PATCH v4 0/9] RISC-V: Implement TLS Descriptors Nelson Chu
2024-02-29  7:14     ` Tatsuyuki Ishi
2024-03-29  6:22       ` Tatsuyuki Ishi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPpQWtA+xvLAd383Nc5_XV_2Mq7vaRojPM9G0yMEhxTt9az3BA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nelson@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=i@maskray.me \
    --cc=ishitatsuyuki@gmail.com \
    --cc=rui314@gmail.com \
    --cc=ruiu@bluewhale.systems \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).