public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nelson Chu <nelson@rivosinc.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	 Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>,
	Jim Wilson <jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: adjust logic to avoid register name symbols
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:09:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPpQWtBvvC8nm7bS8jYUmPH6mNgv9EyQMLdjYSG9pTiL=ZLXjw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bb126f6-5bf1-dab0-f540-25c386b9507e@suse.com>

Though the logic becomes kind of complicated to me, you are more
familiar with other targets than me, so maybe this is the right way to
do it.  Basically, the logic looks correct and fine to me, but I still
need to run regressions in case of an accident.  Just make sure that -
1. The deferred_sym_rootP are the symbols that have the same names as
GPR (or FPR, VPR in the future maybe), but we still need to add them
into the symbol table?
2. Even if the expression has the same name as GPR, only
my_getSmallExpression is possible to set exp to O_register, but
my_getExpression won't have, so the probing_insn_operands is used to
distinguish between them?

Thanks
Nelson

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 4:02 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Special casing GPR names in my_getSmallExpression() leads to a number of
> inconsistencies. Generalize this by utilizing the md_parse_name() hook,
> limited to when instruction operands are being parsed (really: probed).
> Then both the GPR lookup there and the yet more ad hoc workaround for
> PR/gas 29940 can be removed (including its extension needed for making
> the compressed form JAL work again).
> ---
> When a floating point extension (but not [hfdq]inx) is enabled, floating
> point registers would perhaps better be recognized by riscv_parse_name()
> as well. Same for vector registers and likely also CSRs. Otherwise
> inconsistent behavior may (continue to) result when equates come into
> play, afaict.
>
> Considering equates, the new behavior isn't the only sensible one: We
> could also omit the symbol_find() call, thus never honoring equates.
> Then, however, even with the "i" insn suffix (or sometimes infix)
> explicitly specified, equates with names matching a GPR name (or, see
> above, potentially also other register names) wouldn't be accepted
> anymore. I guess the primary question here is what the intended (and
> consistent) behavior is to be.
>
> Overall the uses of my_getSmallExpression() vs my_getExpression() look
> pretty random to me: Is there any underlying principle when which of the
> two is expected to be used?

The my_getSmallExpression is used when we expect the immediate operand
with % prefix, and those % prefixes are used to insert different
relocations.  If there are other exceptions, then we need to fix them.

> --- a/gas/config/tc-riscv.c
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-riscv.c
> @@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ static enum float_abi float_abi = FLOAT_
>
>  static unsigned elf_flags = 0;
>
> +static unsigned probing_insn_operands;

Maybe add some comments to mention that "the probing_insn_operands is
used to distinguish between my_getSmallExpression and
my_getExpression", or other comments, is good for understanding.

> +
>  /* Set the default_isa_spec.  Return 0 if the spec isn't supported.
>     Otherwise, return 1.  */
>
> @@ -2228,21 +2230,9 @@ my_getSmallExpression (expressionS *ep,
>                        char *str, const struct percent_op_match *percent_op)
>  {
>    size_t reloc_index;
> -  unsigned crux_depth, str_depth, regno;
> +  unsigned crux_depth, str_depth;
>    char *crux;
>
> -  /* First, check for integer registers.  No callers can accept a reg, but
> -     we need to avoid accidentally creating a useless undefined symbol below,
> -     if this is an instruction pattern that can't match.  A glibc build fails
> -     if this is removed.  */
> -  if (reg_lookup (&str, RCLASS_GPR, &regno))
> -    {
> -      ep->X_op = O_register;
> -      ep->X_add_number = regno;
> -      expr_parse_end = str;
> -      return 0;
> -    }
> -
>    /* Search for the start of the main expression.
>
>       End the loop with CRUX pointing to the start of the main expression and
> @@ -2265,9 +2255,15 @@ my_getSmallExpression (expressionS *ep,
>          && reloc_index < 1
>          && parse_relocation (&str, reloc, percent_op));
>
> +  if (probing_insn_operands)
> +    ++probing_insn_operands;
> +
>    my_getExpression (ep, crux);
>    str = expr_parse_end;
>
> +  if (probing_insn_operands)
> +    --probing_insn_operands;
> +
>    /* Match every open bracket.  */
>    while (crux_depth > 0 && (*str == ')' || *str == ' ' || *str == '\t'))
>      if (*str++ == ')')
> @@ -2453,6 +2449,13 @@ riscv_is_priv_insn (insn_t insn)
>           || ((insn ^ MATCH_SFENCE_VM) & MASK_SFENCE_VM) == 0);
>  }
>
> +static symbolS *deferred_sym_rootP;
> +static symbolS *deferred_sym_lastP;
> +/* Since symbols can't easily be freed, try to recycle ones which weren't
> +   committed.  */
> +static symbolS *orphan_sym_rootP;
> +static symbolS *orphan_sym_lastP;
> +
>  /* This routine assembles an instruction into its binary format.  As a
>     side effect, it sets the global variable imm_reloc to the type of
>     relocation to do if one of the operands is an address expression.  */
> @@ -2488,6 +2491,8 @@ riscv_ip (char *str, struct riscv_cl_ins
>
>    insn = (struct riscv_opcode *) str_hash_find (hash, str);
>
> +  probing_insn_operands = 1;
> +
>    asargStart = asarg;
>    for ( ; insn && insn->name && strcmp (insn->name, str) == 0; insn++)
>      {
> @@ -2504,6 +2509,17 @@ riscv_ip (char *str, struct riscv_cl_ins
>        /* Reset error message of the previous round.  */
>        error.msg = _("illegal operands");
>        error.missing_ext = NULL;
> +
> +      /* Purge deferred symbols from the previous round, if any.  */
> +      while (deferred_sym_rootP)
> +       {
> +         symbolS *sym = deferred_sym_rootP;
> +
> +         symbol_remove (sym, &deferred_sym_rootP, &deferred_sym_lastP);
> +         symbol_append (sym, orphan_sym_lastP, &orphan_sym_rootP,
> +                        &orphan_sym_lastP);
> +       }
> +
>        create_insn (ip, insn);
>
>        imm_expr->X_op = O_absent;
> @@ -2558,9 +2574,22 @@ riscv_ip (char *str, struct riscv_cl_ins
>                 }
>               if (*asarg != '\0')
>                 break;
> +
>               /* Successful assembly.  */
>               error.msg = NULL;
>               insn_with_csr = false;
> +
> +             /* Commit deferred symbols, if any.  */
> +             while (deferred_sym_rootP)
> +               {
> +                 symbolS *sym = deferred_sym_rootP;
> +
> +                 symbol_remove (sym, &deferred_sym_rootP,
> +                                &deferred_sym_lastP);
> +                 symbol_append (sym, symbol_lastP, &symbol_rootP,
> +                                &symbol_lastP);
> +                 symbol_table_insert (sym);
> +               }
>               goto out;
>
>             case 'C': /* RVC */
> @@ -2764,8 +2793,6 @@ riscv_ip (char *str, struct riscv_cl_ins
>                 case 'p':
>                   goto branch;
>                 case 'a':
> -                 if (oparg == insn->args + 1)
> -                   goto jump_check_gpr;
>                   goto jump;
>                 case 'S': /* Floating-point RS1 x8-x15.  */
>                   if (!reg_lookup (&asarg, RCLASS_FPR, &regno)
> @@ -3270,18 +3297,6 @@ riscv_ip (char *str, struct riscv_cl_ins
>               continue;
>
>             case 'a': /* 20-bit PC-relative offset.  */
> -             /* Like in my_getSmallExpression() we need to avoid emitting
> -                a stray undefined symbol if the 1st JAL entry doesn't match,
> -                but the 2nd (with 2 operands) might.  */
> -             if (oparg == insn->args)
> -               {
> -           jump_check_gpr:
> -                 asargStart = asarg;
> -                 if (reg_lookup (&asarg, RCLASS_GPR, NULL)
> -                     && (*asarg == ',' || (ISSPACE (*asarg) && asarg[1] == ',')))
> -                   break;
> -                 asarg = asargStart;
> -               }
>             jump:
>               my_getExpression (imm_expr, asarg);
>               asarg = expr_parse_end;
> @@ -3504,6 +3519,8 @@ riscv_ip (char *str, struct riscv_cl_ins
>    if (save_c)
>      *(asargStart  - 1) = save_c;
>
> +  probing_insn_operands = 0;
> +
>    return error;
>  }
>
> @@ -3800,6 +3817,62 @@ riscv_after_parse_args (void)
>      flag_dwarf_cie_version = 3;
>  }

The comment of ppc said "This function is called for each symbol seen
in an expression.  It handles the special parsing ...", looks good and
more easy to understand the logic, so could we also have a similar
description detailed?

> +bool riscv_parse_name (const char *name, struct expressionS *ep,
> +                      enum expr_mode mode)
> +{
> +  unsigned int regno;
> +
> +  if (!probing_insn_operands)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  gas_assert (mode == expr_normal);
> +
> +  regno = reg_lookup_internal (name, RCLASS_GPR);
> +  if (regno == (unsigned int)-1)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  if (symbol_find (name) != NULL)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  if (probing_insn_operands > 1)
> +    {
> +      ep->X_op = O_register;
> +      ep->X_add_number = regno;
> +    }
> +  else
> +    {
> +      /* Create a symbol without adding it to the symbol table yet.
> +        Insertion will happen only once we commit to using the insn
> +        we're probing operands for.  */
> +      symbolS *sym;
> +
> +      for (sym = deferred_sym_rootP; sym; sym = symbol_next (sym))
> +       if (strcmp (name, S_GET_NAME (sym)) == 0)
> +         break;
> +      if (!sym)
> +       {
> +         for (sym = orphan_sym_rootP; sym; sym = symbol_next (sym))
> +           if (strcmp (name, S_GET_NAME (sym)) == 0)
> +             {
> +               symbol_remove (sym, &orphan_sym_rootP, &orphan_sym_lastP);
> +               break;
> +             }
> +         if (!sym)
> +           sym = symbol_create (name, undefined_section,
> +                                &zero_address_frag, 0);
> +
> +         symbol_append (sym, deferred_sym_lastP, &deferred_sym_rootP,
> +                        &deferred_sym_lastP);
> +       }
> +
> +      ep->X_op = O_symbol;
> +      ep->X_add_symbol = sym;
> +      ep->X_add_number = 0;
> +    }
> +
> +  return true;
> +}
> +
>  long
>  md_pcrel_from (fixS *fixP)
>  {
> --- a/gas/config/tc-riscv.h
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-riscv.h
> @@ -123,6 +123,10 @@ extern void riscv_elf_final_processing (
>  /* Adjust debug_line after relaxation.  */
>  #define DWARF2_USE_FIXED_ADVANCE_PC 1
>
> +#define md_parse_name(name, exp, mode, c) \
> +  riscv_parse_name (name, exp, mode)
> +bool riscv_parse_name (const char *, struct expressionS *, enum expr_mode);
> +
>  #define md_finish riscv_md_finish
>  #define CONVERT_SYMBOLIC_ATTRIBUTE riscv_convert_symbolic_attribute
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-15  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-13  8:01 [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V/gas: re-work register named symbols avoidance logic Jan Beulich
2023-02-13  8:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: test for expected / no unexpected symbols Jan Beulich
2023-02-13  8:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: adjust logic to avoid register name symbols Jan Beulich
2023-02-15  3:09   ` Nelson Chu [this message]
2023-02-15  8:03     ` Jan Beulich
2023-02-15  8:48       ` Nelson Chu
2023-02-15  9:21         ` Jan Beulich
2023-02-16  9:36           ` Nelson Chu
2023-02-16 16:49             ` Jan Beulich
2023-02-16 16:54               ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-03-03 13:52             ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-15 10:07               ` Nelson Chu
2023-03-15 11:49                 ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-16  0:30                   ` Nelson Chu
2023-04-19  9:37                     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPpQWtBvvC8nm7bS8jYUmPH6mNgv9EyQMLdjYSG9pTiL=ZLXjw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=nelson@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=andrew@sifive.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).