public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cui, Lili" <lili.cui@intel.com>
To: "Beulich, Jan" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>,
	"Kong, Lingling" <lingling.kong@intel.com>,
	"binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 6/9] Support APX NDD
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:22:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB5600FF6444A1DBF20F2F262D9E352@SJ0PR11MB5600.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d45e9ae-5376-4d05-94d4-e1104ba59a11@suse.com>

> On 22.03.2024 11:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 08.12.2023 15:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 24.11.2023 08:02, Cui, Lili wrote:
> >>> +rol, 0xd0/0, APX_F,
> >>>
> +W|Modrm|No_sSuf|CheckOperandSize|DstVVVV|EVex128|EVexMap4|NF, {
> >>> +Imm1,
> >>>
> +Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64|Byte|Word|Dword|Qword|Unspecified|BaseInd
> ex,
> >>> +Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64 }
> >>>  rol, 0xd0/0, 0, W|Modrm|No_sSuf, { Imm1,
> >>>
> Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64|Byte|Word|Dword|Qword|Unspecified|BaseIndex
>  }
> >>> +rol, 0xc0/0, APX_F,
> >>>
> +W|Modrm|No_sSuf|CheckOperandSize|DstVVVV|EVex128|EVexMap4|NF, {
> >>> +Imm8|Imm8S,
> >>>
> +Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64|Byte|Word|Dword|Qword|Unspecified|BaseInd
> ex,
> >>> +Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64 }
> >>>  rol, 0xc0/0, i186, W|Modrm|No_sSuf, { Imm8|Imm8S,
> >>>
> Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64|Byte|Word|Dword|Qword|Unspecified|BaseIndex
>  }
> >>> +rol, 0xd2/0, APX_F,
> >>>
> +W|Modrm|No_sSuf|CheckOperandSize|DstVVVV|EVex128|EVexMap4|NF, {
> >>> +ShiftCount,
> >>>
> +Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64|Byte|Word|Dword|Qword|Unspecified|BaseInd
> ex,
> >>> +Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64 }
> >>>  rol, 0xd2/0, 0, W|Modrm|No_sSuf, { ShiftCount,
> >>>
> Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64|Byte|Word|Dword|Qword|Unspecified|BaseIndex
>  }
> >>> +rol, 0xd0/0, APX_F,
> >>>
> +W|Modrm|No_sSuf|CheckOperandSize|DstVVVV|EVex128|EVexMap4|NF, {
> >>>
> +Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64|Byte|Word|Dword|Qword|Unspecified|BaseInd
> ex,
> >>> +Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64 }
> >>
> >> Didn't we agree to avoid adding this (and its sibling) template, for
> >> the omitted shift count being ambiguous? Consider
> >>
> >>     rol %cl, %al
> >>
> >> Is this a rotate by %cl, or a 1-bit NDD rotate?
> >
> > Btw, while this comment was taken into account for the "normal" shifts
> > and rotates, SHLD / SHRD still have this odd extra form.
> 
> I have to correct myself here: RCL and RCR had such an odd form retained, too
> (as, perhaps, a side effect of prematurely adding the non-NDD forms there).
> 

For RCL/RCR, we dropped the format of omitting $1.
rcl, 0xd0/2, APX_F, W|Modrm|No_sSuf|CheckOperandSize|DstVVVV|EVexMap4, { Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64|Unspecified|BaseIndex, Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64 }

For example, when the register is %rcx, it will conflict with the following template.

rcl, 0xd2/2, 0, W|Modrm|No_sSuf, { ShiftCount, Reg8|Reg16|Reg32|Reg64|Unspecified|BaseIndex }

I'm confused if we really want to omit the %cl case. I'll confirm it later.


Thanks,
Lili.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-24  7:02 [PATCH 1/9] Make const_1_mode print $1 in AT&T syntax Cui, Lili
2023-11-24  7:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] Support APX GPR32 with rex2 prefix Cui, Lili
2023-12-04 16:30   ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-05 13:31     ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-06  7:52       ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-06 12:43         ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-07  9:01           ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-08  3:10             ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-24  7:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] Created an empty EVEX_MAP4_ sub-table for EVEX instructions Cui, Lili
2023-11-24  7:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] Support APX GPR32 with extend evex prefix Cui, Lili
2023-12-07 12:38   ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-08 15:21     ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-11  8:34       ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-12 10:44         ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-12 11:16           ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-12 12:32             ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-12 12:39               ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-12 13:15                 ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-12 14:13                   ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-13  7:36                     ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-13  7:48                       ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-12 12:58         ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-12 14:04           ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-13  8:35             ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-13  9:13               ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-07 13:34   ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-11  6:16     ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-11  8:43       ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-11 11:50   ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-24  7:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] Add tests for " Cui, Lili
2023-12-07 14:05   ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-11  6:16     ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-11  8:55       ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-24  7:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] Support APX NDD Cui, Lili
2023-12-08 14:12   ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-11 13:36     ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-11 16:50       ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-13 10:42         ` Cui, Lili
2024-03-22 10:02     ` Jan Beulich
2024-03-22 10:31       ` Jan Beulich
2024-03-26  2:04         ` Cui, Lili
2024-03-26  7:06           ` Jan Beulich
2024-03-26  7:18             ` Cui, Lili
2024-03-22 10:59       ` Jan Beulich
2024-03-26  8:22         ` Cui, Lili [this message]
2024-03-26  9:30           ` Jan Beulich
2024-03-27  2:41             ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-08 14:27   ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-12  5:53     ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-12  8:28       ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-24  7:02 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] Support APX Push2/Pop2 Cui, Lili
2023-12-11 11:17   ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-15  8:38     ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-15  8:44       ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-24  7:02 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] Support APX NDD optimized encoding Cui, Lili
2023-12-11 12:27   ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-12  3:18     ` Hu, Lin1
2023-12-12  8:41       ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-13  5:31         ` Hu, Lin1
2023-12-12  8:45       ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-13  6:06         ` Hu, Lin1
2023-12-13  8:19           ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-13  8:34             ` Hu, Lin1
2023-11-24  7:02 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] Support APX JMPABS for disassembler Cui, Lili
2023-11-24  7:09 ` [PATCH 1/9] Make const_1_mode print $1 in AT&T syntax Jan Beulich
2023-11-24 11:22   ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-24 12:14     ` Jan Beulich
2023-12-12  2:57 ` Lu, Hongjiu
2023-12-12  8:16 ` Cui, Lili

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SJ0PR11MB5600FF6444A1DBF20F2F262D9E352@SJ0PR11MB5600.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=lili.cui@intel.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hongjiu.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=lingling.kong@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).