* 2.42 branch has been created
@ 2024-01-15 15:28 Nick Clifton
2024-01-15 15:36 ` H.J. Lu
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-01-15 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
Hi Everyone,
The <NEW_VERSION> branch has now been created:
git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git -b binutils-2_42-branch
A snapshot of the sources is also available here:
https://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.41.90.tar.xz
Please could all patches for the branch be run by me.
The rules for the branch are:
* No new features.
* Target specific bug fixes are OK.
* Generic bug fixes are OK if they are important and widely tested.
* Documentation updates/fixes are OK.
* Translation updates are OK.
* Fixes for testsuite failures are OK.
Ideally I would like to make the release happen in two weeks time,
i.e. Monday Jan 29. Which I hope will be enough time for everyone
to get their final fixes in.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-15 15:28 2.42 branch has been created Nick Clifton
@ 2024-01-15 15:36 ` H.J. Lu
2024-01-15 15:58 ` Nick Clifton
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2024-01-15 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: binutils
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 7:28 AM Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The <NEW_VERSION> branch has now been created:
>
> git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git -b binutils-2_42-branch
>
> A snapshot of the sources is also available here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.41.90.tar.xz
>
> Please could all patches for the branch be run by me.
> The rules for the branch are:
>
> * No new features.
> * Target specific bug fixes are OK.
> * Generic bug fixes are OK if they are important and widely tested.
> * Documentation updates/fixes are OK.
> * Translation updates are OK.
> * Fixes for testsuite failures are OK.
>
> Ideally I would like to make the release happen in two weeks time,
> i.e. Monday Jan 29. Which I hope will be enough time for everyone
> to get their final fixes in.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
>
I am checking a test patch:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-January/131860.html
to fix:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31245
--
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-15 15:28 2.42 branch has been created Nick Clifton
2024-01-15 15:36 ` H.J. Lu
@ 2024-01-15 15:58 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-17 11:12 ` Xi Ruoyao
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-01-15 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
Hi Guys,
On 1/15/24 15:28, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The <NEW_VERSION> branch has now been created:
Doh! I use a template to create the new-branch email and I
obviously forgot to replace <NEW VERSION> with 2.42. Sorry
about that.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-15 15:28 2.42 branch has been created Nick Clifton
2024-01-15 15:36 ` H.J. Lu
2024-01-15 15:58 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2024-01-17 11:12 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-17 11:41 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-19 10:39 ` Jan Beulich
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Xi Ruoyao @ 2024-01-17 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton, binutils, mengqinggang
On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 15:28 +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The <NEW_VERSION> branch has now been created:
>
> git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git -b binutils-2_42-branch
>
> A snapshot of the sources is also available here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.41.90.tar.xz
>
> Please could all patches for the branch be run by me.
> The rules for the branch are:
>
> * No new features.
> * Target specific bug fixes are OK.
Hi Nick,
Is it ok to apply
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-January/131871.html which
is already in master for 2.42? I consider it a target specific bug fix
(though arguably it's actually adapting for a bug fix in the psABI
documentation).
> * Generic bug fixes are OK if they are important and widely tested.
> * Documentation updates/fixes are OK.
> * Translation updates are OK.
> * Fixes for testsuite failures are OK.
>
> Ideally I would like to make the release happen in two weeks time,
> i.e. Monday Jan 29. Which I hope will be enough time for everyone
> to get their final fixes in.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-17 11:12 ` Xi Ruoyao
@ 2024-01-17 11:41 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-17 11:42 ` Xi Ruoyao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-01-17 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xi Ruoyao, binutils, mengqinggang
Hi Xi Ruoyao,
> Is it ok to apply
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-January/131871.html which
> is already in master for 2.42?
Yes it is - please do so.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-17 11:41 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2024-01-17 11:42 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-18 11:58 ` mengqinggang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Xi Ruoyao @ 2024-01-17 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton, binutils, mengqinggang
On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 11:41 +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Xi Ruoyao,
>
> > Is it ok to apply
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-January/131871.html w
> > hich
> > is already in master for 2.42?
>
> Yes it is - please do so.
I don't have a write access, so leaving this for Qinggang.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-17 11:42 ` Xi Ruoyao
@ 2024-01-18 11:58 ` mengqinggang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mengqinggang @ 2024-01-18 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xi Ruoyao, Nick Clifton, binutils
It has been applied.
在 2024/1/17 下午7:42, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> On Wed, 2024-01-17 at 11:41 +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
>> Hi Xi Ruoyao,
>>
>>> Is it ok to apply
>>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-January/131871.html w
>>> hich
>>> is already in master for 2.42?
>> Yes it is - please do so.
> I don't have a write access, so leaving this for Qinggang.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-15 15:28 2.42 branch has been created Nick Clifton
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-17 11:12 ` Xi Ruoyao
@ 2024-01-19 10:39 ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-19 11:13 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-24 9:29 ` mengqinggang
2024-01-27 7:47 ` Indu Bhagat
5 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2024-01-19 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: binutils
On 15.01.2024 16:28, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The <NEW_VERSION> branch has now been created:
>
> git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git -b binutils-2_42-branch
>
> A snapshot of the sources is also available here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.41.90.tar.xz
>
> Please could all patches for the branch be run by me.
> The rules for the branch are:
>
> * No new features.
> * Target specific bug fixes are OK.
On x86, I'd like to ask for your okay to cherry-pick
5190fa38286a x86: support APX forms of U{RD,WR}MSR
2519809009ed x86/APX: be consistent with insn suffixes
eea4357967b6 x86/APX: VROUND{P,S}{S,D} can generally be encoded
Thanks, Jan
> * Generic bug fixes are OK if they are important and widely tested.
> * Documentation updates/fixes are OK.
> * Translation updates are OK.
> * Fixes for testsuite failures are OK.
>
> Ideally I would like to make the release happen in two weeks time,
> i.e. Monday Jan 29. Which I hope will be enough time for everyone
> to get their final fixes in.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-19 10:39 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2024-01-19 11:13 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-01-19 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: binutils
Hi Jan,
> On x86, I'd like to ask for your okay to cherry-pick
>
> 5190fa38286a x86: support APX forms of U{RD,WR}MSR
> 2519809009ed x86/APX: be consistent with insn suffixes
> eea4357967b6 x86/APX: VROUND{P,S}{S,D} can generally be encoded
These are fine, please apply them to the branch.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-15 15:28 2.42 branch has been created Nick Clifton
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-19 10:39 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2024-01-24 9:29 ` mengqinggang
2024-01-24 9:42 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-24 17:40 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-27 7:47 ` Indu Bhagat
5 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mengqinggang @ 2024-01-24 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton, binutils
在 2024/1/15 下午11:28, Nick Clifton 写道:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The <NEW_VERSION> branch has now been created:
>
> git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git -b binutils-2_42-branch
>
> A snapshot of the sources is also available here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.41.90.tar.xz
>
> Please could all patches for the branch be run by me.
> The rules for the branch are:
>
> * No new features.
> * Target specific bug fixes are OK.
On LoongArch, I'd like to ask for your okay to cherry-pick
601c741d5ce6 LoongArch: gas: Start a new frag after instructions
that can be relaxed
27a750dd896c LoongArch: gas: Don't define LoongArch .align
32ee2b4b71c7 LoongArch: Do not emit R_LARCH_RELAX for two
register macros
Thanks
> * Generic bug fixes are OK if they are important and widely tested.
> * Documentation updates/fixes are OK.
> * Translation updates are OK.
> * Fixes for testsuite failures are OK.
>
> Ideally I would like to make the release happen in two weeks time,
> i.e. Monday Jan 29. Which I hope will be enough time for everyone
> to get their final fixes in.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-24 9:29 ` mengqinggang
@ 2024-01-24 9:42 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-24 17:41 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-24 17:40 ` Nick Clifton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Xi Ruoyao @ 2024-01-24 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mengqinggang, Nick Clifton, binutils
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:29 +0800, mengqinggang wrote:
>
> 在 2024/1/15 下午11:28, Nick Clifton 写道:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > The <NEW_VERSION> branch has now been created:
> >
> > git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git -b binutils-2_42-branch
> >
> > A snapshot of the sources is also available here:
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.41.90.tar.xz
> >
> > Please could all patches for the branch be run by me.
> > The rules for the branch are:
> >
> > * No new features.
> > * Target specific bug fixes are OK.
>
>
> On LoongArch, I'd like to ask for your okay to cherry-pick
>
> 601c741d5ce6 LoongArch: gas: Start a new frag after instructions
> that can be relaxed
> 27a750dd896c LoongArch: gas: Don't define LoongArch .align
> 32ee2b4b71c7 LoongArch: Do not emit R_LARCH_RELAX for two
> register macros
I'd like to add 7b0b94b7b9a97c2af8c9557b2e5a3fc7ac3e6ee0 (LoongArch: Fix
some test failures about TLS desc and TLS relaxation) to keep the test
results clean. This commit only changes tests.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-24 9:29 ` mengqinggang
2024-01-24 9:42 ` Xi Ruoyao
@ 2024-01-24 17:40 ` Nick Clifton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-01-24 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mengqinggang, binutils
Hi mengqinggang,
> On LoongArch, I'd like to ask for your okay to cherry-pick
>
> 601c741d5ce6 LoongArch: gas: Start a new frag after instructions that can be relaxed
> 27a750dd896c LoongArch: gas: Don't define LoongArch .align
> 32ee2b4b71c7 LoongArch: Do not emit R_LARCH_RELAX for two register macros
Yes OK - please apply these commits to the branch.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-24 9:42 ` Xi Ruoyao
@ 2024-01-24 17:41 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-25 1:40 ` mengqinggang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-01-24 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xi Ruoyao, mengqinggang, binutils
Hi Xi,
> I'd like to add 7b0b94b7b9a97c2af8c9557b2e5a3fc7ac3e6ee0 (LoongArch: Fix
> some test failures about TLS desc and TLS relaxation) to keep the test
> results clean. This commit only changes tests.
That is fine as well. Please commit to the branch (or ask someone else to do it for you...)
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-24 17:41 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2024-01-25 1:40 ` mengqinggang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: mengqinggang @ 2024-01-25 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton, Xi Ruoyao, binutils
Hi,
Applied to branch binutils-2_42-branch.
在 2024/1/25 上午1:41, Nick Clifton 写道:
> Hi Xi,
>
>> I'd like to add 7b0b94b7b9a97c2af8c9557b2e5a3fc7ac3e6ee0 (LoongArch: Fix
>> some test failures about TLS desc and TLS relaxation) to keep the test
>> results clean. This commit only changes tests.
>
> That is fine as well. Please commit to the branch (or ask someone
> else to do it for you...)
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-15 15:28 2.42 branch has been created Nick Clifton
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-24 9:29 ` mengqinggang
@ 2024-01-27 7:47 ` Indu Bhagat
2024-01-29 14:47 ` Nick Clifton
5 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Indu Bhagat @ 2024-01-27 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
On 1/15/24 7:28 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The <NEW_VERSION> branch has now been created:
>
> git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git -b binutils-2_42-branch
>
> A snapshot of the sources is also available here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.41.90.tar.xz
>
> Please could all patches for the branch be run by me.
> The rules for the branch are:
>
> * No new features.
> * Target specific bug fixes are OK.
> * Generic bug fixes are OK if they are important and widely tested.
> * Documentation updates/fixes are OK.
> * Translation updates are OK.
> * Fixes for testsuite failures are OK.
>
What do you think about the following two:
91cdbed4d7b gas: scfi: untraceable control flow should be a hard error
16cbeae1b27 x86: testsuite: scfi: adjust COFI testcase
The fix for PR gas/31284 (91cdbed4d7b) builds upon the refactoring done
in the prior commit (16cbeae1b27). The fix for PR gas/31284 is "good to
have" category, not a "must have".
> Ideally I would like to make the release happen in two weeks time,
> i.e. Monday Jan 29. Which I hope will be enough time for everyone
> to get their final fixes in.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-27 7:47 ` Indu Bhagat
@ 2024-01-29 14:47 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-30 5:37 ` Xi Ruoyao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-01-29 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Indu Bhagat, binutils
Hi Indu,
> 91cdbed4d7b gas: scfi: untraceable control flow should be a hard error
> 16cbeae1b27 x86: testsuite: scfi: adjust COFI testcase
They squeaked in at the last moment. :-)
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-29 14:47 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2024-01-30 5:37 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-30 12:38 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Xi Ruoyao @ 2024-01-30 5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton, Indu Bhagat, binutils
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 14:47 +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Indu,
>
> > 91cdbed4d7b gas: scfi: untraceable control flow should be a hard
> > error
> > 16cbeae1b27 x86: testsuite: scfi: adjust COFI testcase
>
> They squeaked in at the last moment. :-)
>
> Cheers
> Nick
Unfortunately something seems wrong in the backport:
ERROR: /home/xry111/sources/lfs/binutils-
2.42/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-cofi-1.l doesn't exist
And in a58dc5427f0a6b580e9a37a53399503325956f65 (backport of
91cdbed4d7b) ginsn-cofi-1.{l,s} are removed. It seems a mistake (TM).
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.42 branch has been created
2024-01-30 5:37 ` Xi Ruoyao
@ 2024-01-30 12:38 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2024-01-30 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xi Ruoyao, Indu Bhagat, binutils
Hi Xi,
> Unfortunately something seems wrong in the backport:
>
> ERROR: /home/xry111/sources/lfs/binutils-
> 2.42/gas/testsuite/gas/scfi/x86_64/ginsn-cofi-1.l doesn't exist
*sigh* There is always something!
I see that Indu has already updated the branch, and I do not think
that this problem is serious enough to warrant a point release on
its own. Although distribution maintainers may complain at me,
since it introduces an error into the gas testsuite for x86 builds.
We shall see.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-30 12:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-15 15:28 2.42 branch has been created Nick Clifton
2024-01-15 15:36 ` H.J. Lu
2024-01-15 15:58 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-17 11:12 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-17 11:41 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-17 11:42 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-18 11:58 ` mengqinggang
2024-01-19 10:39 ` Jan Beulich
2024-01-19 11:13 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-24 9:29 ` mengqinggang
2024-01-24 9:42 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-24 17:41 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-25 1:40 ` mengqinggang
2024-01-24 17:40 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-27 7:47 ` Indu Bhagat
2024-01-29 14:47 ` Nick Clifton
2024-01-30 5:37 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-30 12:38 ` Nick Clifton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).