public inbox for buildbot@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>
Cc: Matthias Klose <matthias.klose@canonical.com>,
	Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
	binutils@sourceware.org, buildbot@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: The 2.40 branch has been created
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 12:07:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230104110741.GC9735@gnu.wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <941388e7-8e4d-0bbf-5cc6-249fe1dd8c5f@arm.com>

Hi Christophe,

On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:31:50AM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >I'll push the following to try the new builders.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> I see they are all failing currently ;-)
> I have sent patches for the armhf failures yesterday, so they will
> hopefully become green soon.
> I don't understand why the arm64 ones are failing, is it because
> there is one linker test with XPASS? (I didn't notice any
> "unexpected failure" in the .sum summaries)

Yes, the "XPASS: Run pr19719 fun undefined" is unexpected and so fails
make check.

Note that same XPASS on binutils-fedora-arm64, but that also has an
extra FAIL: Build pr26094-1

Cheers,

Mark

      reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <87mt739186.fsf@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <35a47bed-36af-6f8a-55a6-9cef247f9840@canonical.com>
     [not found]   ` <e6fcc285-becc-5816-db4a-36e37e8c08cd@arm.com>
     [not found]     ` <20230102230528.GA6490@gnu.wildebeest.org>
     [not found]       ` <2351b01b-ace6-3028-ece5-0f47caf21950@arm.com>
2023-01-04  0:35         ` Mark Wielaard
2023-01-04 10:31           ` Christophe Lyon
2023-01-04 11:07             ` Mark Wielaard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230104110741.GC9735@gnu.wildebeest.org \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=buildbot@sourceware.org \
    --cc=christophe.lyon@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.klose@canonical.com \
    --cc=nickc@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).