Re: The 2.40 branch has been created

[Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>]

On 1/4/23 01:35, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 06:29:30PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> Actually we have:
>> armhf-ubuntu20_04 and armhf-ubuntu22_04 to build GDB and
>> ubuntu22_04-armhf to build GCC
>>
>> The containers we use to build GDB have less cores than the ones we
>> use for GCC. If we add binutils builders on the same workers as GDB,
>> will they cooperate nicely (as in "do not compete for CPU", ie. be
>> scheduled at different times)?
>>
>> If yes, maybe it makes sense to add binutils builders to:
>> armhf-ubuntu20_04
>> armhf-ubuntu22_04
>> arm64-ubuntu20_04
>> arm64-ubuntu22_04
>>
>> WDYT?
> 
> That makes sense. Yes, they will cooperate nicely because the workers
> all have max_builds=1. So if there are multiple builds that could use
> the same worker they will just wait in the pending queue.
> 
> I'll push the following to try the new builders.

Thanks!

I see they are all failing currently ;-)
I have sent patches for the armhf failures yesterday, so they will 
hopefully become green soon.
I don't understand why the arm64 ones are failing, is it because there 
is one linker test with XPASS? (I didn't notice any "unexpected failure" 
in the .sum summaries)

Christophe

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark