* unreviewed patch anniversary
@ 2003-12-04 6:40 Alan Modra
2003-12-04 7:53 ` Doug Evans
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Modra @ 2003-12-04 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cgen
The cpu/openrisc.opc part of the following has never been reviewed.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/2002-q4/msg00045.html
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* unreviewed patch anniversary
2003-12-04 6:40 unreviewed patch anniversary Alan Modra
@ 2003-12-04 7:53 ` Doug Evans
2003-12-04 9:20 ` Alan Modra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Doug Evans @ 2003-12-04 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Modra; +Cc: cgen
Alan Modra writes:
> The cpu/openrisc.opc part of the following has never been reviewed.
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/2002-q4/msg00045.html
The openrisc.opc change is fine with me
(pedantic: assuming it's been tested, which I'm sure it has, or was ...).
Also, pedantically (sorry!), one might want to check with the openrisc
maintainer which I'm guessing isn't on this list, but for something
like this it's probably overkill.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: unreviewed patch anniversary
2003-12-04 7:53 ` Doug Evans
@ 2003-12-04 9:20 ` Alan Modra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Modra @ 2003-12-04 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Evans; +Cc: cgen, Johan Rydberg
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:52:53PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote:
> Alan Modra writes:
> > The cpu/openrisc.opc part of the following has never been reviewed.
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/2002-q4/msg00045.html
>
> The openrisc.opc change is fine with me
> (pedantic: assuming it's been tested, which I'm sure it has, or was ...).
It's been tested to death. :) openrisc-elf happens to be one of the
targets that I use when testing for binutils regressions.
> Also, pedantically (sorry!), one might want to check with the openrisc
Who's that? jrydberg@rtmk.org?
> maintainer which I'm guessing isn't on this list, but for something
> like this it's probably overkill.
Yes, it is a rather simple and obvious set of changes. I'm taking your
comment about overkill as licence to commit. I've committed it, and
cc'd Johan.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-04 9:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-04 6:40 unreviewed patch anniversary Alan Modra
2003-12-04 7:53 ` Doug Evans
2003-12-04 9:20 ` Alan Modra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).