public inbox for cgen@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Mike Frysinger via Cgen <cgen@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: tighten up generated decode tables
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 11:30:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzp5nrbx.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZYXqUP-SMB21NFbk@vapier> (Mike Frysinger's message of "Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:58:08 -0500")


> On 22 Dec 2023 11:55, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> > The use of /* fall through */ with consective case statements doesn't
>> > really add any value, and when generating large files, can take up a
>> > lot of space.  In the case of cris, it alone adds ~20k, or ~10%.
>> 
>> I am a little concern this change may trigger implicit-fallthrough
>> warnings when compiling the generated code.  Not sure this is a problem
>> in practice though, since nor binutils nor sim uses
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough for building as far as I can see.
>
> pretty sure compilers don't warn about consecutive case statements that
> don't have any non-case code inbetween.  so we're talking about:
>           case 11:
>           case 12:
>           case 13:
>           case 14: itype = CRISV10F_INSN_ADDOQ; goto extract_sfmt_addoq;
>
> since this is a very common scenario, compilers accept it without warning.
> if you did something like:
>           case 13:
>             printf("");
>           case 14: itype = CRISV10F_INSN_ADDOQ; goto extract_sfmt_addoq;
> then it'd warn.
>
> i'm actually enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough in sim now and none of these
> trigger warnings.

OK then.
Thanks!


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-23 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-22  1:00 Mike Frysinger
2023-12-22 10:55 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-12-22 19:58   ` Mike Frysinger
2023-12-23 10:30     ` Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2023-12-22 16:12 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2023-12-22 19:55   ` Mike Frysinger
2023-12-22 20:05     ` Frank Ch. Eigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jzp5nrbx.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=jemarch@gnu.org \
    --cc=cgen@sourceware.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).