From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Mike Frysinger via Cgen <cgen@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: tighten up generated decode tables
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 11:30:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzp5nrbx.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZYXqUP-SMB21NFbk@vapier> (Mike Frysinger's message of "Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:58:08 -0500")
> On 22 Dec 2023 11:55, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> > The use of /* fall through */ with consective case statements doesn't
>> > really add any value, and when generating large files, can take up a
>> > lot of space. In the case of cris, it alone adds ~20k, or ~10%.
>>
>> I am a little concern this change may trigger implicit-fallthrough
>> warnings when compiling the generated code. Not sure this is a problem
>> in practice though, since nor binutils nor sim uses
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough for building as far as I can see.
>
> pretty sure compilers don't warn about consecutive case statements that
> don't have any non-case code inbetween. so we're talking about:
> case 11:
> case 12:
> case 13:
> case 14: itype = CRISV10F_INSN_ADDOQ; goto extract_sfmt_addoq;
>
> since this is a very common scenario, compilers accept it without warning.
> if you did something like:
> case 13:
> printf("");
> case 14: itype = CRISV10F_INSN_ADDOQ; goto extract_sfmt_addoq;
> then it'd warn.
>
> i'm actually enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough in sim now and none of these
> trigger warnings.
OK then.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-23 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-22 1:00 Mike Frysinger
2023-12-22 10:55 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-12-22 19:58 ` Mike Frysinger
2023-12-23 10:30 ` Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2023-12-22 16:12 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2023-12-22 19:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2023-12-22 20:05 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jzp5nrbx.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=jemarch@gnu.org \
--cc=cgen@sourceware.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).