public inbox for cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Running 1.5 and 1.7 sshd in parallel
       [not found] ` <20090626152445.GP30864@calimero.vinschen.de>
@ 2009-06-26 15:35   ` Christopher Faylor
  2009-06-27  1:41     ` Dave Korn
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2009-06-26 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin-talk

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:24:45PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jun 26 17:19, Federico Hernandez wrote:
>>Couldn't find anything on this:
>>
>>Would it be possible to run sshd 1.5 and 1.7 in parallel so one could
>>ssh into cygwin 1.5 and 1.7 on the same machine at the same time.  Of
>>course on ssh would have to run on a different port.  How would one
>>setup this?
>
>Let the sshds use different ports, for instance 22 and 2022.

And if that doesn't work we'll certainly work non-stop, around the clock
to make sure that this crucial functionality is implemented.

Maybe we need a new mailing list to deal with this issue.

cgf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Running 1.5 and 1.7 sshd in parallel
  2009-06-26 15:35   ` Running 1.5 and 1.7 sshd in parallel Christopher Faylor
@ 2009-06-27  1:41     ` Dave Korn
  2009-06-27  2:11       ` Christopher Faylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Korn @ 2009-06-27  1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: The Vulgar And.... oh look! shiney shiney!

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:24:45PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 26 17:19, Federico Hernandez wrote:
>>> Couldn't find anything on this:
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to run sshd 1.5 and 1.7 in parallel so one could
>>> ssh into cygwin 1.5 and 1.7 on the same machine at the same time.  Of
>>> course on ssh would have to run on a different port.  How would one
>>> setup this?
>> Let the sshds use different ports, for instance 22 and 2022.
> 
> And if that doesn't work we'll certainly work non-stop, around the clock
> to make sure that this crucial functionality is implemented.
> 
> Maybe we need a new mailing list to deal with this issue.

  Whaddaya want?  Inferential reasoning or something?

    cheers,
      DaveK

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Running 1.5 and 1.7 sshd in parallel
  2009-06-27  1:41     ` Dave Korn
@ 2009-06-27  2:11       ` Christopher Faylor
  2009-06-27  6:24         ` Peter Rehley
  2009-06-27  7:56         ` Dave Korn
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2009-06-27  2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin-talk

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 02:53:57AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:24:45PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>On Jun 26 17:19, Federico Hernandez wrote:
>>>>Couldn't find anything on this:
>>>>
>>>>Would it be possible to run sshd 1.5 and 1.7 in parallel so one could
>>>>ssh into cygwin 1.5 and 1.7 on the same machine at the same time.  Of
>>>>course on ssh would have to run on a different port.  How would one
>>>>setup this?
>>>Let the sshds use different ports, for instance 22 and 2022.
>>
>>And if that doesn't work we'll certainly work non-stop, around the
>>clock to make sure that this crucial functionality is implemented.
>>
>>Maybe we need a new mailing list to deal with this issue.
>
>Whaddaya want?  Inferential reasoning or something?

No, actually, I want 1.5, 1.7, and B20 to all work on the same machine
at the same time.  Is that too much to ask?

cgf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Running 1.5 and 1.7 sshd in parallel
  2009-06-27  2:11       ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2009-06-27  6:24         ` Peter Rehley
  2009-06-27  7:56         ` Dave Korn
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Rehley @ 2009-06-27  6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin-talk


On Jun 26, 2009, at 07:10 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 02:53:57AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:24:45PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> On Jun 26 17:19, Federico Hernandez wrote:
>>>>> Couldn't find anything on this:
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be possible to run sshd 1.5 and 1.7 in parallel so one  
>>>>> could
>>>>> ssh into cygwin 1.5 and 1.7 on the same machine at the same  
>>>>> time.  Of
>>>>> course on ssh would have to run on a different port.  How would  
>>>>> one
>>>>> setup this?
>>>> Let the sshds use different ports, for instance 22 and 2022.
>>>
>>> And if that doesn't work we'll certainly work non-stop, around the
>>> clock to make sure that this crucial functionality is implemented.
>>>
>>> Maybe we need a new mailing list to deal with this issue.
>>
>> Whaddaya want?  Inferential reasoning or something?
>
> No, actually, I want 1.5, 1.7, and B20 to all work on the same machine
> at the same time.  Is that too much to ask?
>
> cgf

Don't forget 1.3.  For complete compatibility they all need to  
work .... in the same way.

Peter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Running 1.5 and 1.7 sshd in parallel
  2009-06-27  2:11       ` Christopher Faylor
  2009-06-27  6:24         ` Peter Rehley
@ 2009-06-27  7:56         ` Dave Korn
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Korn @ 2009-06-27  7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: I Once Had a Visor That Wasn't Actually All That Hyper

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 02:53:57AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:24:45PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> On Jun 26 17:19, Federico Hernandez wrote:
>>>>> Couldn't find anything on this:
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be possible to run sshd 1.5 and 1.7 in parallel so one could
>>>>> ssh into cygwin 1.5 and 1.7 on the same machine at the same time.  Of
>>>>> course on ssh would have to run on a different port.  How would one
>>>>> setup this?
>>>> Let the sshds use different ports, for instance 22 and 2022.
>>> And if that doesn't work we'll certainly work non-stop, around the
>>> clock to make sure that this crucial functionality is implemented.
>>>
>>> Maybe we need a new mailing list to deal with this issue.
>> Whaddaya want?  Inferential reasoning or something?
> 
> No, actually, I want 1.5, 1.7, and B20 to all work on the same machine
> at the same time.  Is that too much to ask?

  Of course not!  I'll add "Cygwin hypervisor" to the end of my TO-DO list at
once!

    cheers,
      DaveK

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-27  7:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <690f5ac90906260819j4a977530if44a82324eddc229@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20090626152445.GP30864@calimero.vinschen.de>
2009-06-26 15:35   ` Running 1.5 and 1.7 sshd in parallel Christopher Faylor
2009-06-27  1:41     ` Dave Korn
2009-06-27  2:11       ` Christopher Faylor
2009-06-27  6:24         ` Peter Rehley
2009-06-27  7:56         ` Dave Korn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).